World: r3wp
[!CureCode] web-based bugtracking tool
older newer | first last |
Graham 27-Oct-2009 [772x4] | It's caused by a missing copy .... |
Have to reset Cheyenne ... | |
The garbage is gzipped data .... | |
I saw this on my own server a few days ago ... | |
Maxim 28-Oct-2009 [776] | wow, its getting pretty insane! |
Henrik 28-Oct-2009 [777] | I've seen this a lot outside of Curecode. Never figured out what it is. |
Dockimbel 28-Oct-2009 [778x2] | Looks like Cheyenne is trying to create a new form of ASCII art :-). First time I see that on Cheyenne. Will reset the server at once. |
Worker processes reset, seems back to normal now. | |
Maxim 28-Oct-2009 [780x2] | seems there is a copy "" missing somewhere... I could see the last page viewed on cheyenne.org just above the curecode page last time I visited it. |
(or a clear missing) | |
Dockimbel 28-Oct-2009 [782] | I'm wondering why this garbage is showing up now instead of a few weeks ago when I've upgraded the server. |
Graham 28-Oct-2009 [783x4] | Henrik ... no idea when you've seen this issue? |
It only occurs to me after I've been making changes ... not in the normal course of events. | |
hasn't happened since I reported it in March when I was setting the response buffer. | |
Until the other day. | |
Dockimbel 28-Oct-2009 [787] | After a quick code and trace.log files inspection : there's no missing COPY, it seems related to a complex chain of events preventing the RSP output buffer to be CLEARed before re-use. I found a potential flaw in response/include, if the included script raises an error in a way that's not catchable by the RSP execution system, it can prevent the output buffer from being reset. In trace.log file, I've found an error at 00:53 AM from a rejected SMTP connection using SEND function (not the new builtin MTA) that could be the trigger for this issue. |
Graham 28-Oct-2009 [788] | Probably why I only see when debugging faulty rsp code. |
Henrik 28-Oct-2009 [789] | Graham, only during development. Cure was a restart of the server. From Doc's post, it seems he knows what to do about it. |
Dockimbel 29-Oct-2009 [790x6] | CureCode service will be interrupted during a few seconds now in order to upgrade the server. |
Upgrading also PHP to v5.2.11 on the same server...takes a bit more time. | |
It's amazing how much time it takes to compile PHP... | |
The number of modules included on the default config is insane. | |
Stopping Cheyenne... | |
Restarted. Everything seems ok. | |
BrianH 3-Nov-2009 [796x2] | Doc, on the login page, could you add id attributes to the login and pass tags? I'm guessing that is why password saving isn't working in Chrome. The user name is being remembered by forrm completion (which is a separate function in Chrome), but perhaps password saving can't find the user name and password without having an id to look for. Setting the id for tags the same thing as their names might solve that problem. |
I was comparing source between CureCode and other sites that work with Chrome. The missing id attribute is the only difference seen. | |
Pekr 3-Nov-2009 [798x2] | we are over 1000 tickets. Looks good :-) |
btw - still waiting for small enhancement, where Changelog section would have preselected first item in the list :-) | |
Dockimbel 3-Nov-2009 [800x3] | Pekr, I don't understand your request, the first item is already preselected. |
BrianH: I'm adding IDs to login page's fields. | |
Done. | |
Pekr 3-Nov-2009 [803] | Doc - it is not. Just log-off (start new browser), login back, and go to Change-log section. You have to select REBOL 3.0 from drop-down menu ... |
Dockimbel 3-Nov-2009 [804x2] | It's ok here, when I log again with a new fresh browser session, the project selector is showing REBOL 3.0 as soon as I'm logged. Did you used the "Set current..." button in Profil menu? |
If you've never used it, you'll get the default "All Projects" in the selector. | |
BrianH 3-Nov-2009 [806] | Darn, it didn't work again. I'm going to try some more stuff. |
Dockimbel 24-Nov-2009 [807x2] | CureCode server will be stopped from now during a couple of minutes for maintenance. |
Maintenance done. Server up again. | |
Robert 25-Nov-2009 [809] | I'm thinking about using curecode for a project of mine. Can I install it on my server? Can I create a project on curecodes site? |
Henrik 25-Nov-2009 [810] | Robert, I use curecode on my Linode. It took about a day to set up due to numerous little things, but I can probably help. |
Robert 25-Nov-2009 [811] | 1 day... wow. I just thought: Install RSP, call init page, fill-in some informaiton. Done. Ok... will think about it. |
Henrik 25-Nov-2009 [812x3] | it's likely that many of those bugs are fixed in 0.9.9. I'm running 0.9.8. one big problem was to find a rebol version that would run on my server, in combination wtih curecode 0.9.8. I decided to go for a slightly older version to make that combination easier. |
some fixes in curecode also require fixes in cheyenne, etc. | |
I have a dumb idea: Why not extend Curecode with a client package? The client package would be integrated into a program. When a crash occurs in your program, a bug report could be sent directly to your curecode database. There would be a distinction necessary to identify similar reports and gather them under one report. | |
Robert 25-Nov-2009 [815] | Good idea. IMO the distinction is to hard to too. Better to add a curecode admin function to merge tickets but keep the ticket ID towards the customers. |
Dockimbel 25-Nov-2009 [816] | Henrik: I'm doing that for one of our REBOL-based commercial product, but sending crash reports to dedicated database table. Creating tickets directly could be done without much efforts, but I would avoid mixing those automated reports with hand-written ones. Interesting idea to think about anyway. |
Oldes 3-Dec-2009 [817] | Is there any way how to get code formated in some more readable way (at least inside "Example code" field)? |
Dockimbel 3-Dec-2009 [818x4] | Yes, I could change the font to a monospace one. |
Maybe just wrapping the code in <PRE> tag would be enough, didn't tested that yet. | |
I've made a small improvement in the rendering of the "Example code" field in view mode (edit mode is unaffected). Let me know if it's better now. | |
Oldes, I think that you can now remove the <pre> tags from code part in ticket #1369. | |
older newer | first last |