World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 Extensions] REBOL 3 Extensions discussions
older newer | first last |
AdrianS 17-Jul-2010 [1015] | would be easier to use something like SWIG http://www.swig.org/ |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1016] | Got an example of use with R3 extensions? |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1017] | SWIG has REBOL support now? R2 or R3? |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1018] | sure .. just use -r in the options :) |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1019] | And then it magically reads your mind and chooses REBOL, rather than the R that it does support. We could use that ability in REBOL - it would allow us to implement half of the CureCode tickets we've had to dismiss :) |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1020] | As you can see here .. Max took it upon himself to do something about swig R3B0L support http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/r3blog.r?view=0231 |
Steeve 17-Jul-2010 [1021] | Ok, we can sign the 1 billion contract now |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1022] | Has every group become the Humor group now? My grandma would say we are getting punchy :) |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1023x2] | I guess we have to prove we're not a joke ... |
Jocko, I was able to compile your tts example under visual studio express 2010 but with a lot of difficulties :( Size of the dll was 19.5 kbs vs your example which is 8.5kb | |
Carl 17-Jul-2010 [1025] | Maxim: Get and set of object fields has been added to the extension API in A101. So, great things can happen now? But... before A101 is released I need a decent test for extensions, and Robert will be coordinating that project. |
jocko 17-Jul-2010 [1026] | Graham, did not visual studio 2010 convert properly the visual 2008 project file to visual studio 2010 ? |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1027x3] | I had to do this http://jira.rebolsource.net:8080/browse/REBOLKIT-6 |
Maybe one would have fewer issues with using profession visual studio 2010 | |
@Carl, the chicken came first! So, just give us the A101 download link | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1030] | It's not done yet. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1031x2] | Anyone want to try this? write %cimgtest.dll read http://www.compkarori.com/r3extend/cimgtest.dll secure [ extension allow ] import %cimgtest.dll test |
This loads up the C++ CImg Image Processing library and prints "hello world" in purple | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1033] | Good to hear that the ban on directly importing extensions from URLs is still in effect. It's a good rule. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1034x3] | Eh? Didn't try that ... |
Shame shame .... | |
Now to see if I can get tetris up and running | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1037] | It's good, really. It means that you can secure a sandbox and still allow extensions, just by prohibiting writing to disk. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1038x2] | Here's another test download http://www.compkarori.com/r3extend/img.zip unpack it run the r3.exe secure [ extension allow ] import %3d.dll test and it shows a 3d figure you can rotate with the mouse |
How to simulate argc, argv .. I guess we just read the frame | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [1040] | Except there's no way to call or declare commands with argc, argv style of arguments in REBOL. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1041x4] | Source to the 3d rotation demo http://rebol.wik.is/R3_Extensions/CImg_3D_Scene_Rotation |
Someone know why we are still using AGG 2.3 from March 2005? 2.4 still used the BSD license | |
There are changes in the design, files, and interfaces are made, so that, you will have to spend some time for migratintg your applications. I tried to maintain is as painless as possible, but still some concepts have changed. There some files were removed from the package, but not functionality. - probably ... | |
@brian .. what I meant was that many of the C programs I've come across use argv, argc in main. Instead i would pass these parameters in the function that is being exported. Just need to rewrite all those c functions that access argc, and argv | |
Carl 17-Jul-2010 [1045x7] | Graham: host-args.c -- clean and easy to modify or replace with what you need. And special args can still be passed in the arg struct if R3 needs it. |
Ok, so there's a new R3 sitting here on the shelf drying out waiting for some better testing. | |
Has some useful new ext funcs: void *(*make_block)(u32 size); void *(*make_string)(u32 size, int unicode); int (*get_string)(REBSER *series, u32 index, void **str); u32 (*map_word)(REBYTE *string); u32 *(*map_words)(REBSER *series); REBYTE *(*word_string)(u32 word); u32 (*find_word)(u32 *words, u32 word); int (*series_info)(REBSER *series, REBCNT what); int (*get_char)(REBSER *series, u32 index); u32 (*set_char)(REBSER *series, u32 index, u32 chr); int (*get_value)(REBSER *series, u32 index, RXIARG *val); int (*set_value)(REBSER *series, u32 index, RXIARG val, int type); u32 *(*words_of_object)(REBSER *obj); int (*get_field)(REBSER *obj, u32 word, RXIARG *val); int (*set_field)(REBSER *obj, u32 word, RXIARG val, int type); | |
Also, the API is now auto-documented -- within the reb-ext-lib.h -- including special tips. | |
So, this will be A101. | |
To be released once we have a volunteer to write some tests for it. | |
(And no, we'll not just dump it to the group, because I don't want to flood Curecode due to non-tested status. Best to wait on it.) | |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [1052x3] | Carl .. exactly how many posts regarding the hostkit have been made to curecode? |
I presume curecode has a view filter too | |
Two ... one in May, and one in April 2010 | |
Robert 18-Jul-2010 [1055x5] | Call to Community to help us get the next host-kit released: |
We need a way to test extensions with each release. Tests need to be able to handle normal extensions as well as embedded extensions (because the difference is only a few #ifdef statements.) There are a few "dimensions" to test the basic mechanisms: 1. some commands (in a named extension module) 2. commands that use and verify all possible argument datatypes 3. commands that return all different datatypes 4. defining and setting words (variables) 5. accessing values in a block 6. accessing values in an object (new feature, but this is one reason why we need the test) I'm sure there are a few other misc items. We think that the entire tests can be generated with a REBOL script, and save a lot of typing. However, that's not a requirement. | |
I will release our test-framework, which should be used as base or as resulting format. | |
This is a simple to use test environment that can automatically run thousands of tests. | |
And, of course the host-kit that needs to be tested needs to be released. IMO we will release a RC to get feedback on the extension part. | |
Graham 18-Jul-2010 [1060x3] | Don't you release and then test? Isn't this back to front? |
What's the reason that the Linux host-kit has not been released yet? | |
I'm guessing most people are not on windows but other platforms | |
Robert 18-Jul-2010 [1063x2] | Really? I think let's first get the Windows version done, than the Linux. |
Windows is there, so no reason not to use it for testing. | |
older newer | first last |