World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 Extensions] REBOL 3 Extensions discussions
older newer | first last |
AdrianS 12-Jul-2010 [846] | I would recommend cmake as well, seems to work well |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [847] | I can only talk about A96. |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [848] | What is the input to cmake? |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [849] | http://203.97.234.193:8080/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=10020 ... I've added a hostkit tracker to my Jira instance. |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [850] | BTW, no, I'm fine with supporting as many target formats as possible! |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [851] | CMake does basically the same thing your "makefile maker" tries do to. |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [852] | So far I've built it on about 5 different targets... but there are many more. For instance, we've talked about ARM, but the ARM tools are really crude (at least what I've got here.) |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [853x2] | The most common ARM tooling is just GCC. |
CMake Input is a "CMakeLists.txt" file, which is written in "just another Makefile language". | |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [855] | Yes, but the ARM make tool looked like 1982 the last time I tried it. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [856] | No idea what you tried, but you'd typically just use GNU make on ARM as well. |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [857] | Have you tried using the makefile on BSD or OSX? |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [858] | No, as there is no hostkit release for either of those. |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [859] | Basically, same as Linux right now. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [860x2] | Can't sensibly try without e.g. a OSX dylib. |
But I prodded you for weeks to build one :) | |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [862x2] | Also, problematic builds are Sun and HP Unix. But, anyway, if people are willing to add them, it's ok with me. |
Right... I remember that now. We'll have to give it another go. | |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [864] | I guess sticking with the big three (+ BSD, maybe) will be sufficient for now. |
AdrianS 12-Jul-2010 [865] | here's the CMakeLists.txt from the OpenCV project , as an example: https://code.ros.org/svn/opencv/tags/latest_tested_snapshot/opencv/CMakeLists.txt |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [866x2] | In my opinion, there are bigger problems to tackle before spreading thin over multiple platforms makes sense. |
(Eventing, for example) | |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [868] | Yes, of course, but if more developers get involved, the work does not need to be sequential. |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [869] | Oh yeah ..let's get an Os/2 build too ! |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [870] | Hmmm. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [871] | http://bolka.at/2010/rebol3/CMakeLists.txt.html |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [872] | Looking at above link, I don't think cmake provides much benefit to us. |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [873] | ( the current version of Os/2 is ecomworkstation and is positioned as a secure enterprise client environemnt ) |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [874x2] | Here's the CMake buildfile I use for the A96 hostkit |
CMake provides the benefit that we don't have to reinvent the wheel for now. It has, for example, a nice installer for Win32 and can automatically generate Visual Studio project files from the above. | |
AdrianS 12-Jul-2010 [876] | well, if you are considering a makefile generator, at least cmake is somewhat of a standard |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [877] | Installer? What does it install? |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [878x3] | cmake.exe |
CMake takes the above as input and generates e.g. a Makefile as output. | |
Taking specifics of the actual build environment into account. | |
Carl 12-Jul-2010 [881] | The method I use for R3 simply uses REBOL to generate the host-kit, the makefile, and other related files at the same time. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [882x2] | With CMake the workflow of a user who wants to build the hostkit on Win32 would be as follows: - Download and install a toolchain (e.g. MingW or MSVC) - Download and install CMake - Download the R3 Hostkit - Generate a R3 build script for your preferred toolchain using CMake. E.g. use CMake to generate a GNU make Makefile for MingW - Build the R3 Hostkit (using the generated build script) |
Without CMake, those steps would be the same, except for the extra installation of CMake and the generation of a local build script. But it would also either limit the user to a single toolchain (such as MingW, currently) or you would need to replicate some of the functionality of CMake in your make-build.r | |
AdrianS 12-Jul-2010 [884] | there's a GUI front end for cmake too, though I guess one could be made for REBOL just as easily - this lets you resolve env var issues and other things |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [885] | Further, at least for the A96 hostkit, Linux and Win32 hostkits are completely separate packages, and that's an incredible nuisance for someone doing cross-platform work. |
Edgar 12-Jul-2010 [886x2] | It built for me just fine but I had to modify the makefile to use cp lib\r3lib.dll . instead of copy lib\r3lib.dll . inside a mingw cmd window. |
Do we have a test files to run to check if all areas of R3 that is implemented is working? | |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [888] | It would be good if we had access to the test suites |
Edgar 12-Jul-2010 [889] | After adding MinGW\bin and msys\1.0\bin to the windows command path and also copying rebol.exe to msys\1.0\bin folder, I was able to build it from a normal command window without modifying the makefile. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [890] | Carl: in any case, I don't care much about CMake. Just shipping the hostkit with your make-build.r instead of a pre-built makefile would most likely do just fine for getting an integrated cross-platrform build working. (Plus, of course, bundling the libraries and sources for all platforms in the hostkit.) |
Edgar 12-Jul-2010 [891] | I see go.r can be use as test. |
Andreas 12-Jul-2010 [892] | And just in case: _THANKS_ a million for the new hostkit code drop, Carl (and everyone else who helped make it happen)! |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [893] | echo that |
Maxim 12-Jul-2010 [894] | yes thanks to everyone who worked on making it happen. :-) |
Graham 12-Jul-2010 [895] | we now have a domain ( thanks Andreas ) for the tracker http://jira.rebolsource.net:8080/secure/Dashboard.jspa |
older newer | first last |