r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 Schemes] Implementors guide

Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[510]
yeah, but there's nothing to write for the client at this point
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[511]
you mean after it's connected, the client  should only waiting for 
data ?
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[512]
exactly
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[513]
i see
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[514x2]
got it working .. need to enline the header
what do I need to change??
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[516]
but is that really a burden to send by default an EHLO ?
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[517x3]
#                 ; need to write to the client to trigger flow of 
data  

#                 write client to-binary net-log/C rejoin ["EHLO 
" ehlo-msg CRLF]  
#                 ; now ready for the next state  
#                 client/spec/state: 'AUTH
change this to:
read client
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[520]
give it a go ...
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[521]
seems that is doesn't bother the server :)
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[522x2]
client/spec/state: 'INIT
no, but it bothers graham's state machine :)
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[524]
ahah
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[525]
no .... it does bad things :)
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[526]
Graham, you code looks clean, i like it
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[527x2]
sever sends me a bye
if you enline the message, it actually sends the complete email
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[529]
Graham have you an smtp server where we can test your code ?
i don't have one
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[530]
Not me ... I'm using my ISPs and I don't know my password!
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[531]
just use your ISP's :)
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[532x2]
don't have one
wifi spot
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[534]
ie. I can't test the authentication because I don't actually have 
an email account with them.
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[535]
smtp.gmail.com
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[536x2]
yeah ... sure :)
465
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[538]
i just have to create an account on gmail that's right ?
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[539]
No, gmail only uses secure smtp
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[540x3]
ah, forgot about that, yes
mail.gmx.net, then
you don't even need an account, try if you get to the server rejecting 
your message :)
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[543]
oh .. any isp will do ...
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[544]
graham, i need the awake handler in port/state/awake to be set, otherwise 
awake doesn't get called
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[545x2]
I took it out to see why it was needed :)
I mean I open the port and do a read .. and off goes my email
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[547]
hmm, doesn't work for me
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[548]
what do you mean?
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[549x3]
the smtp port's awake is never called
ah, i see, you have the awake on the tcp port instead
strange
Steeve
8-Jan-2010
[552x2]
not strange, it's the only way
fake ports (not tcp one) never receive events
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[554]
the strange was rather a remark about the script not working for 
me
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[555]
what happens in the trace?
Andreas
8-Jan-2010
[556x3]
nothing
but i think i know the reason
it's because the event device is not really working on linux
Graham
8-Jan-2010
[559]
I mean net-log