r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 Schemes] Implementors guide

Graham
10-Jan-2010
[895]
seems a lot of gc must be happening at the tcp port
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[896]
i wonder if the doc is up to date
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[897x2]
I guess Carl has his reasons on doing it this way instead of having 
separate buffers for read and write
Have you fixed my ftp scheme so that it works properly yet?
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[899]
who me ? I never say that
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[900x2]
LOL ...
needs a lot of work ... :(
Pekr
10-Jan-2010
[902]
read/write buffers are shared?
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[903x2]
yes
seems to be according to the docs you linked to
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[905]
i should make a try, i have some doubts
Pekr
10-Jan-2010
[906]
what is it good for? That way you have to read-out all data from 
buffer first, before you do "reverse" (read/write) operation, or 
you mess the data, no?
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[907x2]
yes, copy all your data first before doing a write
store it in port/locals somewhere
Pekr
10-Jan-2010
[909]
it sounds to me as an unnecessary complication. I don't like it. 
But maybe Carl tried to create push on programmers, pushing them 
to do sequency of read/write correctly?
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[910]
seems like a lot of overhead too ...
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[911]
i tested. Alternating read/write causes the buffer cleared each times
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[912]
so the docs are correct
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[913]
But the buffer is cleared only after a write action occured .

If you receive several read events the data are added to the buffer 
(buffer not cleared)
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[914]
Yep, I think that's what I said above
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[915x2]
ok, i just confirmed it with tests
i encountered the famous stack overflow bug.

Never never use a [wait] when you treat an event in the awake handler
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[917]
I see in Gabriele's prot-http he has an http-awake handler that creates 
events which he passes on to another awake handler
Steeve
10-Jan-2010
[918x2]
yes but it"s fake events passed from tcp port thru the fake http 
port.

Actually, it's just calling the event handler function of the fake 
port
it's not asynchronous
Andreas
10-Jan-2010
[920x4]
it's a pity that we have to "fake" these events, currently
I'd love to be able to pass "real" events on, WAKE-UP would already 
be there, but other stuff seems to be missing
i tried sending with WAKE-UP from the tcp port to the scheme port, 
and the scheme port's AWAKE handler even got called
but a WAIT on the scheme port never returns, even though the scheme's 
AWAKE returns true
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[924x4]
anyone can test this http://rebol.wik.is/Rebol3/Schemes/Ftp
the default timeout times out waiting for ftp.debian .. so I put 
a wait 10 seconds there!
I was trying to find a ftp site with a lot of data to read from ...
I may have some redundant waits there in the handler
Andreas
10-Jan-2010
[928x2]
try /debian/pool/main/x/ instead of /debian/dists/lenny/
that should give you a huge directory listing :)
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[930x2]
ok
eeek... r3alpha crashed on me :(
Andreas
10-Jan-2010
[932]
heh :)
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[933x5]
yeah ..doesn't get a complete directory listing ...
something must be wrong in my dataport event handler
missing a read port in the read event
only picks up 5355 bytes
I can pick up the rest doing a 
read cmd
Andreas
10-Jan-2010
[938]
sounds like it should be
Graham
10-Jan-2010
[939]
...
Andreas
10-Jan-2010
[940x5]
i think with PASV you should just re-read on the data port until 
the port is closed, no?
i just tried a bit from the console
i got LIST reponse for /debian/pool/main/x with two read events
first returned 32000 bytn
bytes*