r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Pekr
11-Mar-2010
[1206]
btw - docs are geting better and better. Draw and Shape docs were 
added recently. Gobs too ...
Henrik
11-Mar-2010
[1207]
Has anyone taken a look at Active Records? It looks quite interesting.

http://ar.rubyonrails.org/
Pekr
11-Mar-2010
[1208]
This is quite this kind of nonsense I thought we could avoid :-) 
You simply often might find the case, where it will not fit your 
situation, and then docs say - you can't do everything, using the 
concept. So then you are left with some usefull, but not-in-100%-cases 
usefull case, and between the raw solution. IIRC Chis has similar 
solution with his system? I don't remember the name .... however 
- this does not belong in the GUI group, and this is exactly where 
I thought your form  abstraction aproach will lead you :-)
shadwolf
11-Mar-2010
[1209]
To carl concerning the timing problems noticed on my computer i got 
those result (windows seven; CPU core i 5 750, DRR3 1333 Mhz; R3 
a 97)

>> dt [loop 10 [wait 0.0001]]
== 0:00:00.000016

>> dt [loop 100 [wait 0.0001]]
== 0:00:00.000084

>> dt [loop 1000 [wait 0.0001]]
== 0:00:00.000783

>> dt [loop 10000 [wait 0.0001]]
== 0:00:00.007763


As you can see on my coputer my timings are lower than expected so 
sthis issue is related to CPU horse power.
Steeve
11-Mar-2010
[1210x2]
Not the problem, try this instead, it should return around the same 
time, not the case.


>> repeat i 6 [print [n: 10 ** i "x" j: 0.1 ** i tab "=" dt [loop 
n[wait j]]]]
10.0 x 0.1			= 0:00:01.000137
100.0 x 0.01			= 0:00:01.00159
1000.0 x 0.001		= 0:00:01.023774
10000.0 x 0.0001		= 0:00:00.044802 (strange)
100000.0 x 0.00001		= 0:00:00.459103 (here too)
1000000.0 x 0.000001	= 0:00:05.503772
Conclusion, never use timer below 0.001
BrianH
11-Mar-2010
[1212]
I'll go with Carl's conclusion: It's a bug.
Henrik
11-Mar-2010
[1213]
hmm... when writing a reactor, you can specify any-type! as an argument, 
but GUI parsing halts when encountering a path! for that argument. 
Does anyone know if this is a DELECT thing?
Steeve
11-Mar-2010
[1214x3]
yep, delect is used for
path are evaluated by delect, they can't be used as parameter.
lit-path works
Henrik
11-Mar-2010
[1217]
ok, thanks
Steeve
11-Mar-2010
[1218]
strangly, get-path! works too
Henrik
11-Mar-2010
[1219]
I didn't think that it wouldn't work, since this is inside the dialect 
and so the path shouldn't be evaluated.
Steeve
11-Mar-2010
[1220x2]
well, word are evaluated as-well if they are used for parameters
if they wasn't we counld not use variables in our draw blocks
BrianH
11-Mar-2010
[1222]
The dialect itself evaluates some stuff.
GiuseppeC
11-Mar-2010
[1223x2]
Henrik, I admit I have not read the whole discussion but I have a 
question:
Does this system caches data somewhere before updating the record(s) 
or data is immediately written on the record field ?

When an user edit a file it must be checked for proper input

When multiple fields are edited they may have a relationship on consistency 
and there is a mutual validation

When you save the recordset  there could be errors on writing and 
the whole transaction need to be discarded instead of being partly 
written.
Henrik
11-Mar-2010
[1225x2]
validation is not a part of the UI yet, but it will be.
the idea is simply not to submit the data until the form is validated. 
I've not decided yet, but validation could be a reactor, the way 
things are shaping up right now.
Chris
11-Mar-2010
[1227]
P: Validation ('import) and Active Record (RoughCut) are essential 
components of QM.  Validation (along the lines of 'import) could 
easily be part of a panel/layout's specification...
GiuseppeC
12-Mar-2010
[1228]
Ok Henrik, please do not forget a "record modified" trigger for the 
UI. In multiuser enviromnent it is really useful to know if the record 
has been modified by someone else.
Henrik
12-Mar-2010
[1229]
hmm.. yes, will see what can be done.
Pekr
12-Mar-2010
[1230x2]
any new screenshots? :-)
Henrik - what was last status of resizing? Carl admitted, that resizing 
is broken. But I do remember some discussions about using different 
model to Carl's choosen one. And btw - is 'max-size requirement still 
there?
Henrik
12-Mar-2010
[1232x2]
resizing has not changed yet. it's pretty isolated so we can choose 
to fix that if Carl doesn't get to fixing it. no real show stopper 
yet, other than it's annoying to look at.
screenshots: not really anything interesting. it's the same as before, 
only I'm working on how to error handle reactors. some reactors, 
I think, should be handled in a more friendly way than currently 
(simply crash).
amacleod
12-Mar-2010
[1234]
So we can start using R3-GUI and expect minor changes to use and 
implimentation?


I thought there was going to be some major changes yet to come and 
present functionality might change significantly...
Henrik
12-Mar-2010
[1235]
we change one thing at a time.
amacleod
12-Mar-2010
[1236]
So if I follow the new docs i'm pretty safe?
Henrik
12-Mar-2010
[1237x2]
last I read them a couple of days ago there were some inaccuracies 
compared to Carl's version, so I don't know if he's doing any of 
his own changes.
but general concepts like actors, reactors, faces, styles, etc. shouldn't 
change. it's smaller details that are a little different, like function 
names.
Steeve
12-Mar-2010
[1239x2]
recycle/ballast 50000
screen: system/view/screen-gob
system/view/event-port: open event://
font1: make system/standard/font [size: 20]
fire: [
	line-width 0.5 pen black fill-pen white line-pattern white 
	text vectorial 0x70 [font font1 bold "F I R E !!!"]
]

insert strokes: skip find fire 'line-pattern 2 rand: [0 0 1 1 2 3 
3 4 4 5]
img: make image! xy: 100x100

show append screen gob: make gob! [offset: xy size: xy image: img]

forever [
	change img copy/part skip img 0x1 100x76
	change strokes random rand
	draw img fire
	effect img [blur difference 2.5.10]
	wait 0.03
	show gob
]
better with:

effect img [blur img difference 2.5.10]
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1241]
Steeve - nice effects :-)
Steeve
13-Mar-2010
[1242x3]
i optimized it a litlle bit (removed the "change copy/part image" 
that eats memory)
and the flames are dancing :)
recycle/ballast 50000
screen: system/view/screen-gob
system/view/event-port: open event://
font1: make system/standard/font [size: 20]
insert strokes: skip fire: [
	image img (first random [1x-2 0x-2 1x-2 0x-2 -1x-2])
	line-width 0.5 pen red fill-pen white line-pattern black 
	text vectorial 0x40 [font font1 bold "F I R E !!!"]
] 'line-pattern 2 rand: [0 1 1 1 2 5 ]
img: make image! xy: 100x70

show append screen gob: make gob! [offset: xy size: xy image: img]
forever [
	change strokes random rand
	draw img fire
	effect img [difference 3.5.8 blur img]
	wait 0.05 show gob
]
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1245]
Script: "Untitled" Version: none Date: none

** Script error: skip does not allow word! for its offset argument
** Where: catch either either applier do
** Near: catch/quit either var [[do/next data var]] [data]
Steeve
13-Mar-2010
[1246]
insert strokes: skip find fire: [
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1247]
hmm, quite fast :-)
Steeve
13-Mar-2010
[1248x2]
yes 'im glad, perfs are good
i even slowed down the timer
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1250]
and it takes some 3-6% CPU here ...
Steeve
13-Mar-2010
[1251]
yep, here too
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1252]
ah, now 50% :-)
Steeve
13-Mar-2010
[1253]
varying
Pekr
13-Mar-2010
[1254x2]
I wonder what would be needed for transition effects, as e.g. PowerPoint 
has ... to slide away screen or its elements in various ways. There 
is some basic effect -fly-out - in recent R3 gui demo, but dunno 
if it is interchangeable
e.g. try following in R2: http://xidys.com/rebol/presentation.r