r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1706]
factors: min-size, max-size, group, panel
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1707]
now=no
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1708]
It was theoretically possible with Carl's resize model - ignoring 
whether the math worked - but it was really awkward to specify. That 
is my main concern.
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1709]
Rebolek, actually you are wrong, you cannot define layouts with elements 
having max-size/min-size without having a direct support for these 
features (maximally, you can get some "ugly approximations", but 
surely not the same behaviour)
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1710]
The main problem with Carl's resize model was that it was difficult 
to specify proportional scaling independent of max-size. This made 
layouts fail on unexpectedly large screens, or made it necessary 
to put in a lot of very large numbers in max-size.
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1711]
That dependency does not exist in the new resizing model
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1712]
Well then that is really good news :)
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1713]
And, yes, that was a motivation for me to invent something more convenient
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1714]
I know I'm wrong regarding the min-size, but not the max-size.
Steeve
24-Jun-2010
[1715]
I just think  proportional resizing feature is the problem. It's 
usually useless and hard to code.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1716x2]
re language support .. I think primarily faces have to adjust for 
different lengths of text
when you translate from one language to another
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1718]
Hard to code, yes. Useless, no, not unless you're on a fixed-size 
screen.
Steeve
24-Jun-2010
[1719]
Proportionnal resizing without font resizing has no use, IMO.
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1720]
Well, Steeve, you do not have to use it, but it will be available 
in case it is needed
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1721]
Steeve, that would defeat the purpose of buying a large screen so 
you can see more stuff. Used a spreadsheet lately? Graham, that can 
change the whole layout. If it autoadjusts, cool, but you'd at least 
need different layouts for languages that go in different directions.
Steeve
24-Jun-2010
[1722x2]
I do no  say we don't need resizing
*not
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1724x2]
well I think I'll restrict to languages that go from left to right
and are horizontal
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1726]
It's not proportional resizing ONLY, if you want your elements to 
stay whey they were, you're free to do so.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1727x2]
Chinese used to be right to left and top to bottom... but I think 
they've changed
Is Arabic still right to left?
Steeve
24-Jun-2010
[1729]
But the old way (fixing the corners to the container) is goog enough.
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1730]
Graham: yes, but AFAIK, they write their numbers mostly L->R. Strange.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1731]
Our numbering system is based on the arabic one ...
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1732]
yes, but it seems, that the origins of the system go back to Babylon
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1733]
I also want a combination of proportional resizing for scale, and 
expanding sections for size. Fot instance, an iPhone 4 has a higher 
resolution screen than a Droid, but the Droid's screen may be larger. 
So I want to both scale to higher resolutions on platforms that support 
them, but make use of more physical space when available, as needed. 
I don't want my menu/ribbon to expand to fill more of the screen 
unless I am going to be further away from it.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1734]
Not to Babel ?
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1735]
Yes, R->L. I'm tired today :)
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1736]
Wasn't the babylonian system base-60? Or was that someone else?
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1737]
ah sorry, Babylon is a transcription used in Cz
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1738]
Anway, I just want to know if faces resize to their text and we don't 
explicitly have to set them
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1739]
I don't want resizing. It's mostly useless. You need to define UI 
for each device. Abstraction doesn't work. That's the sad truth.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1740]
Rebolek .. if it works in 90% of the cases ... for many people, that's 
good enough
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1741]
I want resizing for the desktop, and scaling for devices like Android-based 
phones where you can't necessarily know the resolution/size ahead 
of time.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1742x2]
People can code around the other cases hopefully
These phones are changing screen sizes every release
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1744]
Babylonians had base-60 numbers, indeed, but the evidence exists, 
that they founded our positional system
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1745x2]
Graham, it may work for the desktop, but it's not working for mobile 
devices.
Brain, exactly.
Ladislav
24-Jun-2010
[1747]
the invention of zero was a considerable breakthrough, taking into 
account, that even nowadays there are people hesitating to call zero 
"a number"
Steeve
24-Jun-2010
[1748]
it's a bit, actually :-)
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1749]
Just read a new Droid review - larger screen than a iPhone 4, less 
resolution. I'm starting to want a device-independent coordinate 
system :(
Rebolek
24-Jun-2010
[1750]
But iPhone is very consistent. It had the same resolution and now 
it doubled it. Android is almost unpredictable in that manner. Unfortuately.
Henrik
24-Jun-2010
[1751x2]
well, there is the iPad too. I imagine there will be more different 
screensizes in the future.
also now that Microsoft seem to be releasing a new mobile OS per 
week...
BrianH
24-Jun-2010
[1753x2]
Nope, just new form factors. They still only have the 2 mobile OSes.
Plus legacy versions of those two of course.
Graham
24-Jun-2010
[1755]
so do faces adjust for text size automatically??  anyone know?