World: r3wp

The main problem with Carl's resize model was that it was difficult 
to specify proportional scaling independent of max-size. This made 
layouts fail on unexpectedly large screens, or made it necessary 
to put in a lot of very large numbers in max-size.

That dependency does not exist in the new resizing model

Well then that is really good news :)

And, yes, that was a motivation for me to invent something more convenient

I know I'm wrong regarding the min-size, but not the max-size.

I just think  proportional resizing feature is the problem. It's 
usually useless and hard to code.

re language support .. I think primarily faces have to adjust for 
different lengths of text

when you translate from one language to another

Hard to code, yes. Useless, no, not unless you're on a fixed-size 
screen.

Proportionnal resizing without font resizing has no use, IMO.

Well, Steeve, you do not have to use it, but it will be available 
in case it is needed

Steeve, that would defeat the purpose of buying a large screen so 
you can see more stuff. Used a spreadsheet lately? Graham, that can 
change the whole layout. If it autoadjusts, cool, but you'd at least 
need different layouts for languages that go in different directions.

I do no  say we don't need resizing

*not

well I think I'll restrict to languages that go from left to right

and are horizontal

It's not proportional resizing ONLY, if you want your elements to 
stay whey they were, you're free to do so.

Chinese used to be right to left and top to bottom... but I think 
they've changed

Is Arabic still right to left?

But the old way (fixing the corners to the container) is goog enough.

Graham: yes, but AFAIK, they write their numbers mostly L->R. Strange.

Our numbering system is based on the arabic one ...

yes, but it seems, that the origins of the system go back to Babylon

I also want a combination of proportional resizing for scale, and 
expanding sections for size. Fot instance, an iPhone 4 has a higher 
resolution screen than a Droid, but the Droid's screen may be larger. 
So I want to both scale to higher resolutions on platforms that support 
them, but make use of more physical space when available, as needed. 
I don't want my menu/ribbon to expand to fill more of the screen 
unless I am going to be further away from it.

Not to Babel ?

Yes, R->L. I'm tired today :)

Wasn't the babylonian system base-60? Or was that someone else?

ah sorry, Babylon is a transcription used in Cz

Anway, I just want to know if faces resize to their text and we don't 
explicitly have to set them

I don't want resizing. It's mostly useless. You need to define UI 
for each device. Abstraction doesn't work. That's the sad truth.

Rebolek .. if it works in 90% of the cases ... for many people, that's 
good enough

I want resizing for the desktop, and scaling for devices like Android-based 
phones where you can't necessarily know the resolution/size ahead 
of time.

People can code around the other cases hopefully

These phones are changing screen sizes every release

Babylonians had base-60 numbers, indeed, but the evidence exists, 
that they founded our positional system

Graham, it may work for the desktop, but it's not working for mobile 
devices.

Brain, exactly.

the invention of zero was a considerable breakthrough, taking into 
account, that even nowadays there are people hesitating to call zero 
"a number"

it's a bit, actually :-)

Just read a new Droid review - larger screen than a iPhone 4, less 
resolution. I'm starting to want a device-independent coordinate 
system :(

But iPhone is very consistent. It had the same resolution and now 
it doubled it. Android is almost unpredictable in that manner. Unfortuately.

well, there is the iPad too. I imagine there will be more different 
screensizes in the future.

also now that Microsoft seem to be releasing a new mobile OS per 
week...

Nope, just new form factors. They still only have the 2 mobile OSes.

Plus legacy versions of those two of course.

so do faces adjust for text size automatically??  anyone know?

Graham, they do not. Right now.

UI still needs lot of work.

oh ...

Just keep it in mind please guys!