r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Pekr
14-Jul-2010
[1937]
OK, now I understand - I was just trying to understand, what is currently 
happening :-) Any ETA for the transition? 1 month, more? :-)
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1938x2]
so we just have some primitives again?
This AGG stuff is pretty old ... has copyright from 2005
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1940]
transition shouldn't affect GUI development. it's not like all copies 
of A97 stopped working. :-)
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1941x2]
AGG 2.4 has the BSD license and 2.5 ( seems work stopped in 2007 
or before ) has the GPL license.
So, I guess we're stuck with 2.4 unless we can find something else
Pekr
14-Jul-2010
[1943]
Graham - we use AGG 2.4, because with 2.5, Max changed license to 
GPL. But Cyphe said, that there is not much new in 2.5. AGG is a 
dead-end anyway - it is not further developed by original author 
(Max Shemanarev) imo, but still good.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1944x2]
So, what are the alternatives?
OpenGL
Pekr
14-Jul-2010
[1946]
no, Cairo ... but AGG is still better than Cairo, so why to worry? 
And even if Max does not develop it further, maybe AGG community 
will come with some other improvements ...
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1947]
We can enhance agg ourself, I guess.
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1948]
so far we're not even taking 100% advantage of AGG, so there's a 
bit of juice left in it.
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1949]
Yep, there are some interesting methods, like bounding_rect or so 
(to calculate the bounding coords of a shape)
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1950x2]
rather than enhance AGG 2.4 .. why not move to OpenGL ?
We then get access to all the 3D stuff and physics models
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1952x2]
I'm not sure openGL can cover what AGG does and vice versa.
so both are in a way relevant
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1954x2]
Henrik, something really interesting would be a method to get back 
all the constructed vertices (after transformations).
As a shape block.
Don't know if I'm clear
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1956]
I see AmigaOS4.1 uses cairo
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1957x2]
Graham, yes, since Hyperion are so insistant on making AmigaOS look 
like any other linux that is of course what they would use.
Steeve, Cyphre probably understands that better than me, but I assume 
this means some level of hardware acceleration possibility of DRAW 
transformations. :-)
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1959]
I see Cairo has both PS and PDF as output targets ... which sounds 
really good to me!
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1960]
uh ?
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1961]
http://cairographics.org/manual/cairo-ps-surface.html
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1962]
The only thing Carl dislikes about AGG so far is that it's written 
in C++. This gives compiler issues.
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1963]
Transformations are handled by matrix computations in AGG, how do 
you want to accelerate that and keep it portable ?
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1964x2]
Steeve, ignore me. I just don't understand your original statement. 
Cyphre would understand it. :-)
Graham, I suspect Cairo takes on tasks other than rasterization, 
which is why it has PDF/PS outputs. AGG doesn't do that and shouldn't 
be doing that anyway.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1966]
Why not?
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1967]
Henrik, I just think (in the contrary) that we could get back all 
the constructed vertices just before rasterization, in a plain rebol 
block.
So that we could output any format we want easly (PDF, PS)
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1968x2]
Looks like it gives us access also to win32 printing
And it's C and not C++
Robert
14-Jul-2010
[1970]
Let's first get the thing up & running, than used to see what doesn't 
fit and than we think about enhance, re-factoring etc.
Steeve
14-Jul-2010
[1971x2]
Remember that AGG has a neat design. All stages are pipelined and 
it's easly to interrupt it at any step.
*easy
Robert
14-Jul-2010
[1973]
Fighting at too many fronts at the same time is not a good idea.
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1974x3]
Steeve, ok I see what you mean now.
Steeve, but this is still Cyphre territory :-)
Graham, size of the library could grow and we don't want that. But, 
Steeve's idea could circumvent that.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1977x3]
There really is only once place you need to be concerned about the 
library size and that's  for cgi .. and that doesn't use graphics
So I believe the concern about library size is misplaced
We're not in the embedded space, or on phones ...
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1980]
Well, I disagree.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1981]
Rebol's run time memory far exceeds any savings we might get from 
a small library
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1982]
That's not the issue. The issue is to avoid bringing in the hellish 
chaos of win32 printing so close to the rebol core.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1983]
so you want to go another decade without the ability to print??
Henrik
14-Jul-2010
[1984]
There will be plenty of ability to print, but surely there are smarter 
ways to go about that than by bringing in a huge monolithic library 
like Cairo.
Graham
14-Jul-2010
[1985x2]
And the fact is, that most systems will be running the library anyway 
as part of firefox or something else
small is beautiful except when you can't do much with it