World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 GUI]
older newer | first last |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [236] | Gabriele, were you going to upload your GUI system as well? |
Gabriele 3-Feb-2010 [237] | Where? It's on r3-alpha, as well as Carl's old CVS repository. Feel free to copy it from r3-alpha if you want, and Carl is ok. |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [238] | ok, thanks |
Gabriele 3-Feb-2010 [239] | (the code is owned by RT) |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [240x2] | license attached to the code? |
wow .. done 2 years ago now | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [242x2] | Then we can ask Carl for permission to put it in a community repository in DevBase. |
I thought Gabriele held the copyright... Work for hire? | |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [244] | Graham - shouldn't we better finish/fix Carl's VID, if that one is going to become official distro? |
Graham 3-Feb-2010 [245x4] | I was just curious to see how Gab's systemm worked .. and I tried %test.r but >> do %test.r Script: "Test vid" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL View System Functions" Version: none Date: none Script: "rewrite-tree function" Version: none Date: none Script: "Simple dialect to create/resize gobs" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Definition of FACE prototype object" Version: none Date: n one Script: "REBOL VID 3: Functions" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Events Handling" Version: none Date: none Script: "REBOL VID 3: Styles" Version: none Date: none ** Script error: cannot MAKE/TO map! from: none! ** Where: make either make handler parse parse-set-dialect make-styles catch eit her either applier do catch either either applier do ** Near: make map! style-spec/options |
I see R3-gui has a gob called 'code-area which uses a monospaced font. | |
I could use text-list instead of table if that can be used with a monospaced font. | |
Also, I've read thru the docs ( but not the sources ) and it's not documented on how to create a GUI event | |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [249x3] | Graham - there are scripts that work ... you need to have some older alphas ... There is e.g. nice demo of effect lab .... |
hmm, but now AVG is reporting virus ifection for old A30 release .... | |
must be once again false positive ... | |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [252] | That's the false positive I was complaininbg about in Advocacy. You can't dispute it without paying them money. If anyone has a commercial AVG support contract, please dispute that. |
Pekr 3-Feb-2010 [253] | strange that new alphas don't show any such problems ... |
BrianH 3-Feb-2010 [254x2] | Glad of that, since if one showed as a false positive based on a signiature scan it's likely that they all would. |
It's possible that the compressed mezzanine data cooincidentally included a sequence of bytes that matched some signiature of someone else's code, which wouldn't matter to us since that code is decompressed, not executed. | |
Rebolek 3-Feb-2010 [256] | I may try to ask a friend who works at AVG, but I cannot promise anything. |
Graham 4-Feb-2010 [257] | no-edit: [ #"^H" left #"^X" #"^C" #"^V" ignore #"^M" ignore delete deslect delete-end deselect ] filed as ticket 1455 ... |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [258x3] | It looks I can use a monospaced font in a text list by changing the text-list-box face/text-style to 'code instead of 'list-item ... but quite unclear to me how one does this easily |
Is there an easier way to do this than this? code-text-list: tight [ about: "List of selectable text lines with scrollbar using a monospaced font." facets: [ max-size: 150x3000 ] options: [ list-data: [block!] ] content: [ text-list-box :list-data :area-color options [ text-style: 'code ] scroller ] actors: [ on-init: [ if select face 'reactors [ extend face/faces/1 'reactors face/reactors ] ] on-set: [ set-face/list face/faces/1 arg ] on-get: [ get-face face/faces/1 ] ] ] | |
I think it's a little potentially confusing that 'options in a style refers to the stuff that follows a widget when it is used, but the options keyword following the widget refers to the facets | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [261] | parameters instead? |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [262] | sure |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [263] | pars or params, to make it shorter to write :-) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [264x2] | you wouldn't need to write it often! Unless you were writing a lot of your own styles |
so, above it would be parameters: [ list-data: [block!] ] | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [266x2] | vocabulary shows that param, parm, is a regular english word .... |
but other than that, anything is ok with me :-) | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [268] | so that you know that text-list takes a block |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [269x2] | Make sure the word is not used anywhere else in the R3 GUI. Font changing, AFAIR is a little cumbersome. In the R3 GUI, fonts are a resource, similar to colors, certain draw blocks or materials. |
So first you have to define the resource if it doesn't already exist, and then ask for it by name. | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [271] | hence my preference to use long names :) |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [272] | we had one other word to "options" IIRC. I just can't remember it now. It was used for top gob (window) parameters ... then we unified to options ... what was it? |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [273] | There is no occurence of the word 'parameter in the r3 source |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [274x2] | ah, forget it, it was "flags" ... but that is something different ... |
So - we already started continuation work on Carl's VID? :-) | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [276] | we are free to make suggestions... but it would be nice with a place to store them. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [277x2] | or we could use text-list settings [ ... ] insread of options |
Pekr, I'm the last person to make GUi contributions! | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [279] | settings is even better ... |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [280] | settings is a better word than options because options is not really an option ... since they already occur. You are setting them. |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [281] | you have to type more characters (Carl is critical of that) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [282x2] | Luckily there is very little GUI code out there so it's easy to change :) |
hehe .. .one more character! | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [284] | yes, Carl is critical about that. I can understand that ... and then we have words like 'with, etc. :-) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [285] | not a good argument if it leads to confusion |
older newer | first last |