World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 GUI]
older newer | first last |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [271] | hence my preference to use long names :) |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [272] | we had one other word to "options" IIRC. I just can't remember it now. It was used for top gob (window) parameters ... then we unified to options ... what was it? |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [273] | There is no occurence of the word 'parameter in the r3 source |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [274x2] | ah, forget it, it was "flags" ... but that is something different ... |
So - we already started continuation work on Carl's VID? :-) | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [276] | we are free to make suggestions... but it would be nice with a place to store them. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [277x2] | or we could use text-list settings [ ... ] insread of options |
Pekr, I'm the last person to make GUi contributions! | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [279] | settings is even better ... |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [280] | settings is a better word than options because options is not really an option ... since they already occur. You are setting them. |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [281] | you have to type more characters (Carl is critical of that) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [282x2] | Luckily there is very little GUI code out there so it's easy to change :) |
hehe .. .one more character! | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [284] | yes, Carl is critical about that. I can understand that ... and then we have words like 'with, etc. :-) |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [285x2] | not a good argument if it leads to confusion |
VID was confusing for all newbies .. clarity is essential | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [287] | exactly ... I think, that what we are aiming at, is natural understanding of written GUI code. When reading the code, strange words should not disrupt my flow of thoughts ... |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [288x2] | I don't like 'facets either ... |
What does it mean?? | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [290] | facets are any standard part of the face. |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [291] | I never liked facets too :-) I remember it being regular english word, but I once again don't remember its meaning. So for me it is pure only REBOL word :-) |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [292x2] | there is a distinction between standard parts, which are inherited throughout many faces and private parts for each face instance. |
I have no problem with it, perhaps because it's also a Danish word. :-) | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [294x2] | so call it 'parts instead |
I really don't understand the need to invent a new vocabulary | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [296] | facets is also used in VID. it's an old term. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [297x2] | Yes, I know that .. |
And I never liked it then | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [299] | Graham - then we might replace words like face, feel, engage, etc. :-) |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [300] | Feel and engage are gone in R3. They are replaced by actors. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [301] | Yep ... .let's change everything |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [302] | when I read through the sources (which you can get, properly formatted and documented through R3 chat), I can see there probably needs to be a better distinction between 'facet and 'faced. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [303] | a face is comprised of parts vs a face is comprised of facets |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [304x2] | that would sound more like you were talking about which GOBs it was made from. |
a face is an object, and what does an object consist of? | |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [306] | aspects |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [307] | 'facet might be harder to change. I assume Carl chose this name, because it's closely related to FACE and we have GET-FACE and GET-FACET functions, which I find to be very clear. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [308x2] | and too easier to mix up ? |
facet . One of the flat polished surfaces cut on a gemstone or occurring naturally on a crystal. 2. Anatomy A small, smooth, flat surface, as on a bone or tooth. 3. Biology One of the lenslike visual units of a compound eye, as of an insect. 4. One of numerous aspects, as of a subject. See Synonyms at phase. | |
Pekr 5-Feb-2010 [310] | Well, to be honest, while Graham is imo right, that especially to novices, better wording could mean faster learning curve, I also have to say, that it is not the most important topic. Finishing VID is :-) I would like to see incorporated Carl's planned changes, and other subsystems being built-in (still not mechanisms for tabbing, accelerator keys display (can be done via layer), full keyboard navigaton etc.) |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [311] | I don't agree. I've built quite a few styles in R3 now, and I've not once mixed up FACE and FACET, particularly because the path FACE/FACETS exists. I find it to be a pretty natural word to use. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [312] | Aspect 1.. appearance to the eye; visual effect the physical aspect of the landscape 2. a distinct feature or element in a problem, situation, etc.; facet to consider every aspect of a problem 3. the way in which a problem, idea, etc., may be considered to consider a problem from every aspect 4. a facial expression; manner of appearing a severe aspect 5. a position facing a particular direction; outlook the southern aspect of a house 6. a view in a certain direction a good aspect of the village from the tower 7. a surface that faces in a given direction the ventral aspect of a fish 8. (Spirituality, New Age, Astrology & Self-help / Astrology) Astrology any of several specific angular distances between two planets or a planet and the Ascendant or Midheaven measured, from the earth, in degrees along the ecliptic 9. (Linguistics / Grammar) Grammar a category of verbs or verbal inflections that expresses such features as the continuity, repetition, or completedness of the action described Compare perfective [2] progressive [8] [10] 10. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Botany) Botany a. the compass direction to which a plant habitat is exposed, or the degree of exposure b. the effect of the seasons on the appearance of plants 11. Archaic glance or gaze |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [313] | it's much easier to confuse FACET and FACED. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [314] | face ... facet .. faced .... |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [315] | Aspect is also talked about in aspect ratio, which could become a function in R3, like it is in the VID Extension Kit. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [316] | way too confusing |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [317] | I don't agree... but then again, I've written a lot of styles. It may appear confusing to beginners. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [318] | We're not talking about experts! |
Henrik 5-Feb-2010 [319] | Styles are built by experts. Beginners won't see the word in layouts. |
Graham 5-Feb-2010 [320] | I think that's the wrong attitude |
older newer | first last |