World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 GUI]
older newer | first last |
Robert 11-Dec-2010 [4510] | We need to update this one too. |
nve 11-Dec-2010 [4511] | Juste re-download R3, r3-gui.r3 on another computer... >> do %r3-gui.r3 Script: "R3 GUI - load and start" Version: $Id: $ Date: 9-Dec-2010/10:32:04+1:00 ** access error: cannot open: shape reason: "module not found" >> upgrade Fetching upgrade check ... Script: "REBOL 3.0 Version Upgrade" Version: 1.0.1 Date: 7-Apr-2009 Checking for updates... R3 current version: 2.100.110.3.1 It was released on: 2-Nov-2010/3:55:04.875 Your version is current. >> |
Andreas 11-Dec-2010 [4512] | nve, you need a "view" build of R3 in order for the GUI to work. |
Robert 11-Dec-2010 [4513] | I think I will add the R3 build we use to the web-site as well... |
Andreas 11-Dec-2010 [4514] | You can either build one from the Hostkit yourself, or use e.g. the pre-built one provided by Henrik: http://94.145.78.91/files/r3/gui/r3.exe http://94.145.78.91/files/r3/gui/r3lib.dll |
Robert 11-Dec-2010 [4515] | I'm going to upload our internal build in a couple of minutes. |
nve 11-Dec-2010 [4516] | Ok, loading r3-gui.r3 is ok now. Still have failed for test-framework. |
Robert 11-Dec-2010 [4517] | Ok, uploaded. |
nve 11-Dec-2010 [4518] | Seems to be better. But what is final result expected ? >> do %test-framework.r Script: "Test-framework" Version: none Date: 19-Nov-2010/15:00:45+1:00 Script: "Line number" Version: none Date: 1-Nov-2010/14:21:20+1:00 Script: "Catch-any" Version: none Date: 3-Nov-2010/4:58:46+1:00 == make object! [ log-file: none log: make function! [[report [block!]][ write/append log-file to binary! rejoin report ]] skipped: none test-failures: none crashes: none dialect-failures: none succeeded: none failures: none exceptions: make object! [ return: "return/exit out of the test code" error: "error was caused in the test code" break: "break or continue out of the test code" throw: "throw out of the test code" ... |
Andreas 11-Dec-2010 [4519] | nve, the test framework runs roughly 4000+ tests and reports the results. See the "testing & tools" group for more details. |
Aloysius 11-Dec-2010 [4520x6] | I tried to use SciTe editor to run a simple gui script: rebol [] do %r3-gui.r3 view [button] |
What I got in the output pane is: REBOL 3.0 A110 2-Nov-2010/3:56:20 handler added | |
but no window appeared | |
running the same script from command console: "r3.exe testgui.r3" works just fine. It opens a new console window with the same output " REBOL 3.0 A110 2-Nov-2010/3:56:20 handler added" and another window showing the button | |
In Scite, I configured the command Go (F5) as: command.go.$(file.patterns.rebol)=c:\Users\awi\Documents\rebol\r3.exe "$(FilePath)" so nothing different here | |
Maybe anyone has a tip how to fix this, I know this is SciTe problem, but I wonder whether other editor has the same problem. Thanks! | |
Edgar 12-Dec-2010 [4526] | Add this to your configuration, and you will be able to use Ctrl-5 to run rebol3. Change the path as needed. command.name.5.$(file.patterns.rebol)=RunRebol3File command.5.$(file.patterns.rebol)="C:\usr\local\rebol3\r3.exe" "$(FilePath)" command.subsystem.5.*=2 command.is.filter.5=1 |
Awi 12-Dec-2010 [4527] | Cool! Thanks a lot Edgar! I really appreciate this. |
Pekr 13-Dec-2010 [4528] | Could style browser be updated too? It basically crashes with any click I tried to the style's list-box ... |
Henrik 13-Dec-2010 [4529] | The same occurs here, so we'll have to wait for Bolek to fix it. |
Rebolek 13-Dec-2010 [4530] | Pekr, that's list-box (text-list) style problem. This style is currently updated to support more columns than one (called text-table) and text-list will be only sub-case of text-table. The new distribution channel may bring problems like this for regural users, at least before BETA is reached. Some developers prefer to put changes to SVN only when everything is ready, other developers prefer to push changes more often, it might temporarily broke functionality, but it's much more crash-proof strategy. It's a question to debate if every submit should be a release, or if only some special versions should be released, with first option, you will get latest release, that may be broken because of we're still in alfa-phase, with second option you will get more or less working release, but you're definitly going to complain that it's not updated too often (even if my estimate of 1-2x week is hit.) |
RobertS 13-Dec-2010 [4531] | fails for me on any test of mine with ** Script error: path styl/faced is not valid for none! type |
TomBon 13-Dec-2010 [4532] | where can I find the style browser for that gui? |
Andreas 13-Dec-2010 [4533] | TomBon: http://94.145.78.91/files/r3/gui/style-browser.r3 |
TomBon 13-Dec-2010 [4534] | thx andreas |
xavier 13-Dec-2010 [4535x2] | i just try it and it gives me that >> do %style-browser.r3 Script: "R3 GUI Style Browser" Version: $Id: style-browser.r3 1220 2010-11-26 13 :18:02Z cyphre $ Date: none ** Script error: guie has no value ** Where: catch either either -apply- do ** Near: catch/quit either var [[do/next data var]] [data] |
anybody got the same problem ? | |
Pekr 13-Dec-2010 [4537x2] | xavier - see my previous message and Rebolek's explanation. My take is,that it sould be adapted to release, or ppl will find GUI highly non-working ... |
Thy psychological trick is, that ppl will consider any such visual tool being a demo ... the one expecting to work. Prior R3 demo was nice app, pity it is not included with the releases anymore ... | |
Andreas 13-Dec-2010 [4539x2] | The trick in communications is to keep reminding those people that this is alpha work in progress and that if they want something that works, now, they have to go look somewhere else. |
Otherwise, the only option is to shut down completely and not do any development work in the open, but only in invisible elitist circles. We all know how well that approach has served REBOL in the past. | |
Henrik 14-Dec-2010 [4541] | Prior R3 demo was nice app , from what I believe, that app served the same purpose as the style-browser. Having Carl's R3 GUI being more limited, it could be considered more bug free than the current version, thus made a better impression. |
Pekr 14-Dec-2010 [4542] | well, it did not show single styles. It more showed whole topics, so you could see the whole forms with various styles, their setting, resetting, etc. And yes, it was about the impression. I'll wait for style-browser fixes - the truth is, that it was never bug free :-) |
Henrik 14-Dec-2010 [4543] | style-browser fixes - the truth is, that it was never bug free - the style browser does not have any relevant bugs. the styles have bugs. that's the point of the style browser. |
Pekr 14-Dec-2010 [4544] | whatever ... this is just playing with words, and I think it does not matter, as it is not a big deal (btw - when I found the bug, I reported it). My observation though is, that ppl naturally expect some visual demo or something like that - being it a former demo, or a style-browser - it does not matter. So - hopefully when things turn more stable, we could ask Carl to link R3 console demo function to launch a style browser? |
Henrik 14-Dec-2010 [4545] | this is just playing with words, and I think it does not matter - sorry, I think you don't understand the importance of the style browser as a *testing* tool rather than as something to show off with. If we blamed the style browser for the bugs, we'd never finish the GUI. I really mean that style browser bugs are irrelevant. Any more development on it would be to make testing more thorough. At this stage, it's important to build the programs as we want to see them working, and if they don't, the underpinnings are to blame and should be change to accommodate the needs. That is what's going on now. We publish the style browser to help users get the quickest possible overview of the styles as they are right now, crashing or not. Showing off is too early. It should be possible to have the style browser as part of the demos. |
Ladislav 14-Dec-2010 [4546] | A RETURN keyword poll. The RETURN keyword is used in groups (Hgroup, Vgroup) to signal the end of line/column. Panels, however, neither need nor can use RETURN as a keyword. There is a question, whether the RETURN keyword in panel specifications should be: a) silently ignored b) considered an error |
Henrik 14-Dec-2010 [4547] | beginners will probably be irritated at b), but b) makes the most sense to me right now. |
Ladislav 14-Dec-2010 [4548] | As far as I am concerned, I am slightly in favour of the b), which makes the starting score A:B=0:2 |
Andreas 14-Dec-2010 [4549] | b) -- also gives you the option to add a meaningful RETURN for panels later on. |
BrianH 14-Dec-2010 [4550] | b) for the reasons Andreas said. |
Kaj 14-Dec-2010 [4551] | It may be helpful to put a warning in the style browser GUI |
BrianH 14-Dec-2010 [4552] | This is not a demo, this is a style browser, just like the label says. |
Ladislav 14-Dec-2010 [4553] | :-D |
Kaj 14-Dec-2010 [4554] | Browser still sounds like a working utility. It could mention that it's for testing the styles and they are currently expected not to work |
Jerry 14-Dec-2010 [4555] | I used to develop a Chinese Font Engine in R2 using Win32 API GetGlyphOutline(). Now I am trying to do it again in R3, but this time I will get the glyth data from OpenType font files directly. Basically, I can read the Glyph data now, However, when the glyth has zero contour, my OpenType font format parser got error. The OpenType Spec offered by Microsoft is not clear to me on this.... Hope I can solve this problem soon. I cannot wait to see Chinese Characters in My R3 GUI. :-) |
Kaj 14-Dec-2010 [4556] | You could use FreeType to parse the OpenType fonts |
Jerry 14-Dec-2010 [4557] | FreeType? I'll check it out. |
Robert 15-Dec-2010 [4558] | Jerry, the R3 stuff we have uses Freetype and should be able to handle Unicode. |
Jerry 15-Dec-2010 [4559] | I know that, Robert. I just can't wait. :-) |
older newer | first last |