World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 GUI]
older newer | first last |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [775] | How long to take to document? 5 mins :) |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [776] | Graham, active window being known: If Carl says yes, then I just need to know that. BUT: I'm presently needing to be sure the method would be correct for capturing key events everywhere. Currently it just looks like you can only do that for focal-face, which is not enough. |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [777] | I have to tell you... I feel like the way-open-wiki was a bit of a failure. |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [778] | What some of us wonder about is since it is a wiki .. why were all these changes not just rolled bacak |
Pekr 15-Feb-2010 [779x2] | Carl - I hope that joining the GUI effort will not distract you much from HostKit/Extensions work :-) |
WIP wiki is better - only ranked persons can contribute .... | |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [781x2] | H: yes, to be looked at. |
G: code needed too. | |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [783] | Carl, the wiki should be downgraded to simply a repository of documents to be collected later for permanent storage in the WIP wiki. |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [784] | G: he made extensive format and new page changes. |
Pekr 15-Feb-2010 [785] | Can we actually generate events? |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [786x3] | G: so, a rollback could lose actual contributions from valid authors. |
P: multitasking necessary. | |
P: and I'm not talking about code. ;) | |
Pekr 15-Feb-2010 [789x2] | :-) |
C: even MS removed multitasking from today's announced WinMobile 7 .... where the world is going? :-) | |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [791] | I thought wikipedia supports page roll back ... but if that wasn't the case .. it's a lesson |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [792] | H: I agree. I'm going to allow only a few uses like Henrik, etc. to edit at full control level. Other uses can submit notes as comments. |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [793] | I think that's better ... let users add comments and later on the person responsible can fold them back in |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [794] | G: The problem is that the content was cut and pasted all over the place. It's quite a nightmare as I look it over. |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [795] | It's different when there is a large body of knowledgeable users ..., we don't have that yet. |
Robert 15-Feb-2010 [796] | Guys, can we concentrate on the GUI? I think we really need to get something done. By that I mean finished to a 1.0 release. |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [797] | P: As people used to tell me in 1985, "who needs this useless multitasking stuff?" |
Robert 15-Feb-2010 [798] | There are tons of questions and things to do around R3 but let's not fragment our time. Let us concentrate on it and get it done, than move on. All necessary side-effects that need to be fixed are in scope. All other things IMO not. |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [799] | Robert, what needs to be done to the GUI from Carl's side? |
Pekr 15-Feb-2010 [800] | Carl should imo write down notes about how he envisioned GUI 3.4 to work, especially non finished things like events (still from Gab's VID), layers, guides, resizing, etc. |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [801] | Carl, you posted a specs document to me some time ago regarding guides, layers and better layout capabilities. I lost it. :-) Can you post it again? |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [802] | G: Before I can do anything, I need to be sure that we've got the basic design well stated in a document. We can always add from there. |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [803] | I'd like to integrate those specs with the wiki specs document. |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [804] | H: I'll take a look around. Probably in R3-GUI world, no? |
Robert 15-Feb-2010 [805] | I posted Carl a list of main topics. IMO the goal is to sort our what Carl really can do only by himself. All the rest can be done by a group of people. The main effort will be to get the design right. If this is done, the rest is "only" implementation |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [806] | Carl, I can take a look again. |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [807] | Yes, I think we have a good critical mass of skillful developers. |
Robert 15-Feb-2010 [808] | We need a good enough solution, that is open enough that we can drive it forward. At the end of the day, the GUI must fit the developer needs. I'm not seeking for perfection (Ok, I do) but for time-to-market (because I learned/know that it's more critical these days). |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [809] | Real artists ship :-) |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [810] | Well, Robert, I'm glad that you are pushing it ! |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [811x2] | Q: why does Control-C in an area halt R3 ? |
Is that a GUI or a core issue? | |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [813x2] | A: Bug. |
Event issue, so core. | |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [815] | Carl, looked twice now and only found a small document regarding tags (which are implemented now). |
Carl 15-Feb-2010 [816] | Ok, 1 min... searching.... |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [817x2] | seems you can't use reflection functions on events either. |
but I found the window in focus to be inside event/window | |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [819] | so no issue now on dealing with untrapped keys? |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [820x2] | well, the issue is whether the method is correct. now, when no focal face is there, the window on-key actor is used. |
but, there is no limitation in the event system. the problem is just to shape the mezzanines correctly. | |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [822] | I don't recall this being a limitation in R2/vid ... when using keys to activate faces |
Henrik 15-Feb-2010 [823] | I believe there was some kind of sensor face. |
Graham 15-Feb-2010 [824] | Probably the best way for us GUI noobs to be able to help is for Carl to provide coherent docs for us to read and to start writing scripts .... |
older newer | first last |