r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Graham
15-Feb-2010
[775]
How long to take to document?  5 mins :)
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[776]
Graham, active window being known: If Carl says yes, then I just 
need to know that. BUT: I'm presently needing to be sure the method 
would be correct for capturing key events everywhere. Currently it 
just looks like you can only do that for focal-face, which is not 
enough.
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[777]
I have to tell you... I feel like the way-open-wiki was a bit of 
a failure.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[778]
What some of us wonder about is since it is a wiki .. why were all 
these changes not just rolled bacak
Pekr
15-Feb-2010
[779x2]
Carl - I hope that joining the GUI effort will not distract you much 
from HostKit/Extensions work :-)
WIP wiki is better - only ranked persons can contribute ....
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[781x2]
H: yes, to be looked at.
G: code needed too.
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[783]
Carl, the wiki should be downgraded to simply a repository of documents 
to be collected later for permanent storage in the WIP wiki.
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[784]
G: he made extensive format and new page changes.
Pekr
15-Feb-2010
[785]
Can we actually generate events?
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[786x3]
G: so, a rollback could lose actual contributions from valid authors.
P: multitasking necessary.
P: and I'm not talking about code. ;)
Pekr
15-Feb-2010
[789x2]
:-)
C: even MS removed multitasking from today's announced WinMobile 
7 .... where the world is going? :-)
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[791]
I thought wikipedia supports page roll back ... but if that wasn't 
the case .. it's a lesson
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[792]
H: I agree. I'm going to allow only a few uses like Henrik, etc. 
to edit at full control level.  Other uses can submit notes as comments.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[793]
I think that's better ... let users add comments and later on the 
person responsible can fold them back in
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[794]
G: The problem is that the content was cut and pasted all over the 
place.  It's quite a nightmare as I look it over.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[795]
It's different when there is a large body of knowledgeable users 
..., we don't have that yet.
Robert
15-Feb-2010
[796]
Guys, can we concentrate on the GUI? I think we really need to get 
something done. By that I mean finished to a 1.0 release.
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[797]
P: As people used to tell me in 1985, "who needs this useless multitasking 
stuff?"
Robert
15-Feb-2010
[798]
There are tons of questions and things to do around R3 but let's 
not fragment our time. Let us concentrate on it and get it done, 
than move on. All necessary side-effects that need to be fixed are 
in scope. All other things IMO not.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[799]
Robert, what needs to be done to the GUI from Carl's side?
Pekr
15-Feb-2010
[800]
Carl should imo write down notes about how he envisioned GUI 3.4 
to work, especially non finished things like events (still from Gab's 
VID), layers, guides, resizing, etc.
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[801]
Carl, you posted a specs document to me some time ago regarding guides, 
layers and better layout capabilities. I lost it. :-) Can you post 
it again?
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[802]
G: Before I can do anything, I need to be sure that we've got the 
basic design well stated in a document.  We can always add from there.
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[803]
I'd like to integrate those specs with the wiki specs document.
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[804]
H: I'll take a look around. Probably in R3-GUI world, no?
Robert
15-Feb-2010
[805]
I posted Carl a list of main topics. IMO the goal is to sort our 
what Carl really can do only by himself. All the rest can be done 
by a group of people. The main effort will be to get the design right. 
If this is done, the rest is "only"  implementation
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[806]
Carl, I can take a look again.
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[807]
Yes, I think we have a good critical mass of skillful developers.
Robert
15-Feb-2010
[808]
We need a good enough solution, that is open enough that we can drive 
it forward. At the end of the day, the GUI must fit the developer 
needs. I'm not seeking for perfection (Ok, I do) but for time-to-market 
(because I learned/know that it's more critical these days).
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[809]
Real artists ship
 :-)
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[810]
Well, Robert, I'm glad that you are pushing it !
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[811x2]
Q: why does Control-C in an area halt R3 ?
Is that a GUI or a core issue?
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[813x2]
A: Bug.
Event issue, so core.
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[815]
Carl, looked twice now and only found a small document regarding 
tags (which are implemented now).
Carl
15-Feb-2010
[816]
Ok, 1 min... searching....
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[817x2]
seems you can't use reflection functions on events either.
but I found the window in focus to be inside event/window
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[819]
so no issue now on dealing with untrapped keys?
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[820x2]
well, the issue is whether the method is correct. now, when no focal 
face is there, the window on-key actor is used.
but, there is no limitation in the event system. the problem is just 
to shape the mezzanines correctly.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[822]
I don't recall this being a limitation in R2/vid ... when using keys 
to activate faces
Henrik
15-Feb-2010
[823]
I believe there was some kind of sensor face.
Graham
15-Feb-2010
[824]
Probably the best way for us GUI noobs to be able to help is for 
Carl to provide coherent docs for us to read and to start writing 
scripts ....