r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3]

Pekr
26-Jan-2010
[144]
should be imo CCed
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[145x2]
Next one: In R2 I could write:
write output decloak data "mykey"
and: data: read %myfile
Gabriele
26-Jan-2010
[147]
(actually, you could not, without /binary)
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[148]
How to do it in R3? First read gives binary. And decloak produces 
something totally different (binary too), even when using /with.
Gabriele
26-Jan-2010
[149x2]
ah wait, sorry, you used decloak.
just to string! the binary? when you read it?
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[151x2]
Than decloakd doesn't take it. Only works on binary!
BTW: R3-CC link is hard to find. And do I have an account from either 
R3-Chat or AltMe? Or do I need to get an extra one?
Gabriele
26-Jan-2010
[153]
is your data binary? if not, to binary! it. (it should be though, 
the resulf of encloak is binary on R2 as well.)
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[154]
Robert, you need an extra account. I remember the R3 bug system by 
going to curecode.org and clicking "bug tracker".
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[155x2]
Gab: The data was written with: write %filename encloak to-string 
data
data is block!
Gabriele
26-Jan-2010
[157]
robert, that should have been write/binary %filename encloak ... 
otherwise you may lose data.
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[158x2]
Ok, thanks. But will it solve the R3 problem?
Yes, it does. Thx. Got it working now.
Pekr
26-Jan-2010
[160x4]
Hmm, from this - http://www.rebol.com/toc.html
I got to this - http://www.rebol.com/priorities.html
So we at least know a bit, what is planned ;-)
Damned, I was not supposed to link to this page ... and this group 
is web public ....
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[164]
Oh, nice.
Pekr
26-Jan-2010
[165x2]
nice, surely ... now Carl will kill me :-)
otoh I found it out myself ... just clicking small WIP wiki icons, 
which are publicly available :-)
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[167x2]
just wondering when we'll get edit access. typo reports are piling 
up.
From R3 chat it sounds like Graham can edit, but I wonder if he means 
the general pages or just the manual.
amacleod
26-Jan-2010
[169]
Sounds like a lot of work still ahead...for R3 beta
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[170]
Petr, see it as a smart marketing action. Make it hidden, mighty 
and people will take a look. IMO Apple knows this to perfection. 
Creating a huge hype & buzz upfront new products.
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[171]
Rebol's future lies in R3.  So, prioritizing the website over r3 
development, and hence blocking all the developers, seems an odd 
choice
Robert
26-Jan-2010
[172]
+1 (it's an important step, yes. But all people that care about R3 
at the moment are here and know how to use it.)
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[173x2]
We should present our own priority list and compare them ...
No doubt everyone's list will be a little different
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[175]
I wonder if Carl isn't just following a GTD scheme, which basically 
means working on whatever motivates him the most right now, because 
that overall gives the highest level of productivity.
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[176]
Well, no wonder there's no one else left at RT
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[177x2]
and sometimes leaving a problem alone for a while allows a much better 
solution present itself.
to present
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[179]
R3 is not going to be finished by one person ... the whole point 
was to involve the community.
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[180]
well, it seems to me the community is plenty involved, but it could 
be a bit better.
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[181]
Blocking the community by working on the website just seems incompatible 
with that aim
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[182]
I'm not sure how that blocks the community. Did curecode stop working?
Pekr
26-Jan-2010
[183x2]
I agree with Graham - in fact it is highly demotivating and frustrating 
situation. Some points of my analysis are ignored, and exactly predictable. 
When website redo and 2.x upgrade was announced, I knew exactly what 
happens and what it means for R3. Not a one week halt, but it is 
stalled for more than one month already.
Why do we always stop at 95% of the subsystem completness?
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[185]
Normally things stop at 90-95% because they're too difficult
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[186]
Sorry, I'm playing devil's advocate here. But, really, there is still 
a ton of things to do that doesn't involve Carl. The function reference 
manual is only 30% done and that took me a week to do. So why don't 
a couple of people here continue the work? I won't have time for 
the next few months. Carl has asked for this several times, and this 
is something that really needs to be done.
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[187]
Henrik ... do we even have a license?
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[188]
To what?
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[189]
for r3
Pekr
26-Jan-2010
[190]
Henrik - maybe ppl too want to choose, what they work on? :-) E.g. 
Graham started the work on Schemes. He really SHOULD (and was supposed 
to be) supported. Nothin happened. Robert throwed some Extension 
related questions to R3 Chat - no answers too ...
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[191]
A number of us said that R3 chat was a waste of resources ... and 
... now, barely anyone uses it.
Henrik
26-Jan-2010
[192]
So people can choose what to work on and Carl can't?
Graham
26-Jan-2010
[193]
Carl can do what he wants .. and that's the problem