World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
older newer | first last |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3832x2] | Brianh you need to abstract yourself from syntax and semantic rules that's easy you type on your keyboard a like a drunken guy and that's it :) |
you don't imagine all the task it takes me to do a single line of rebol rebol can understaand without errors :) | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3834] | Doesn't help. Damaged hand. |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3835x2] | aaaaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa |
i want rebol to be attractive i want my boss to tell me i can use it every day is that to much to ask ? | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3837] | That is a question for Advocacy. Here, we build stuff :) |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3838x2] | k so buld me a R3 that will make java looks like a toy thank you in advance ... i sware on my grave i would had it writed with "i made my life a rebol" :) |
be we all knows that i won"t die i will fade away progressively than disapear without a trace :) | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3840x2] | Java already seems like a throwback to the last century to me, like a steam engine. Steam engines can still be useful at times though. |
Meanwhile, I should get back to building R3. Right now I'm revamping the module system some more. | |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3842x3] | maybe a good comparation is my netbook ... ok on my netbook i have 3 os i have mister windows 7 starter edition wich use so much mu cpu that the bettery life is cut by 2 |
then i have mister ubuntu netbook 10.04 wild thing animal thing dot thing then faster to start good perf extensible with thousand of applications just with a single click then i have android fast starting no apps and a web browser so slow that i can go take a coffee before the page gets full rendered. android is a close poratage without access to android market so it comes wth some apps and that's all you can get but it boots in 5 secs ... sooooooooooo what do i use ? | |
i use ubuntu why because even if it boot up in 45 seconds that's why better than booting in 3 minutes like windows 7 started ed does and then on the overall use it's way faster and reactive than the windows 7 doing i don't know what with my cpu to mobilise it 100% | |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [3845] | wolfie, there's lots to do before r3 is ready .. why not work with what we have? |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3846] | with ubuntu i have 7 hours of use on battery full charge with windows 7 3hours and the cPU is so hot i can't handle it ... |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3847] | Advocacy, really. We're building something specific here. These general requests to make R3 "better" or "faster" are swamping the group that would better be kept to specifics. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [3848x3] | This is the r3 group ... |
To make R3 better .. we need extensions | |
As I have shown it's fairly trivial to load up a 3D library in R3 | |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3851] | but i want you to build me a R3 with nice graphics that are using lot all my hardware :( |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [3852x2] | Even for someone like me who has never done any C/C++ programming |
Why ask us when you can do this yourself | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3854] | Shadwolf, we got that request. No need to keep elaborating on it. What else, specificly? |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3855] | hum ?? ok so i can speak here if i do an opencl extension and its dialect and then do the port of cheyenne to it and a demo called that's my web server running on my ATI 5670 ? |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3856] | We have the !REBOL3 GUI and !REBOL3 Extensions groups to handle that request. It's a work in process. What else? |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3857] | i'm not the ordered kind of guy sorry i like chaos |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3858] | I like your enthusiasm, but we're actively working on R3 right now. Except the OpenCL stuff, everything you are requesting is already being worked on. |
shadwolf 17-Jul-2010 [3859] | shadwolf is gone owling to the moon in the deepe forest to ease his pain .... |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3860] | I am personally not working on graphics, but others are. Right now I am working on optimizing the module system so the graphics work will be loaded better, faster, safer and more organized. Once that is done I can work on other projects, time and energy permitting. Your vote for OpenCL support has been added to the other requests for it that have already come in. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [3861x2] | With limited man power it makes sense to work on the most blocking aspects of R3 development. I don't know if anyone has created such a list ... and whether it would be adhered to anyway, as development is being driven by politics and money. |
And that's not necessarily a bad thing because without money, we would be stuck with 0 progress. | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3863] | driven by -> supported by Not all of us can afford to donate their time/energy to this. Not even me as much anymore. |
Graham 17-Jul-2010 [3864x5] | http://www.rebol.com/roadmap.htmlwas updated on Bastille day |
This is a list of open projects .. but note that there is no prioritization visible | |
http://www.rebol.com/projects.html | |
The lack of coordination and exclusiveness of the current development methodology does not maximize the use of the community | |
Just because R3 isn't multi-threaded doesn't mean we can't be | |
BrianH 17-Jul-2010 [3869] | Right now the main core of current development is coordinated. It would be nice to maximize the use of the community, but the interrelated projects are already being coordinated, and syncing up the projects that can be done independently would just add management overhead. |
Graham 18-Jul-2010 [3870x2] | Anyone able to assess whether this is feasible http://www.libssh2.org/ as an extension or whatever ... |
BSD license vs the LGPL license for libssh ( which also does server side ssh ) | |
Robert 19-Jul-2010 [3872] | I have used it. Works very good. It's used in the communication layer I have done. |
Graham 19-Jul-2010 [3873] | Are you releasing that or should we reimplement it? |
Robert 19-Jul-2010 [3874] | It will be released. To really be convinient we need R3 callbacks. So, it's to much a prototype yet. My experience showed that things need to have a critical maturity level before others will pick it up and really use it. |
Graham 19-Jul-2010 [3875] | So, did you do a R3 or R2 implementation? |
TomBon 19-Jul-2010 [3876] | ssh extension? this would be great! |
Graham 19-Jul-2010 [3877] | It's not something I have any immediate need for, but it looks like an interesting project to try |
Andreas 21-Jul-2010 [3878] | Brian, you say "We have a task! type now, and have had it for a while. It doesn't work well but when last I checked it does work." Could you elaborate on this? How does one actually use task!, with current R3? |
BrianH 21-Jul-2010 [3879] | In general, one doesn't. There is no infrastructure code around tasks, no way to stop or track them that I know of (they may stop on their own), and the only testing of them that I have done is to track down errors. But they seem to do something. The task-local user context is for the moment by definition rather than actual - it hasn't yet been implemented. But you can MAKE a task! and it will do something. |
Pekr 21-Jul-2010 [3880x2] | a: make task! [wait 5 print "Hello in a task"] do a print "Hello" |
as you can see, it will print "Hello" first, and after 5 secs it will print "Hello in a task" .... the question is, if I got the usage right :-) | |
older newer | first last |