World: r3wp

You can't make money off of selling improvements to Ruby itself. 
The development tools market doesn't work that way anymore. The way 
you make money is to make stuff with the tools, not to make the tools.

all i can do in rebol is selling the  programs i do using rebol... 
but what credibility i have imagine my clients how they work they 
give me specs i propose them to do it in rebol they say no because 
if you get any problem we the client will not be able to get easyly 
a substitute to you  to retake your work and get it enhanced ...

Since you haven't been participating as much, you don't know how 
far along we are, so you don't understand how incredibly dumb it 
would be to scrap the code base and start over. We are only working 
on one VM. If someone else wants to start another project, fine, 
but they should have a good case for allocating the resources, and 
not do anything to preclude others from helping them.

BrianH hum and no people asked for my help neither ... supposing 
i could bring some help which is not the case i think...

I have on many occasions asked for contributions and help, and many 
have answered. If you feel that you can't help, you will be missed 
but we will make do.

i know but my way to help is different but not uninterresting ... 
and franckly i'm maybe one  of the few more interrested in what can 
be done with rebol than what can be done to improve rebol ... what 
is the meaning of adding things if we already don't use what exists 
in rebol ?

If I start up a project for R3 interoperability with Java would you 
help? Don't worry, I won't use a (L)GPL license so you won't be prevented 
from working on other projects with the code you write.

Note: Interoperability, not necessarily cloning (unless that is what 
is required). Improving the development process on the Java platform 
would be the goal.

if i can if i have access to the whole source code, but i will try 
...  most of the time i need to see the big picture to get ideas 
on how to proceed ... a mono C# clone intent have been tryed 4 years 
ago it was spirit then sudently the author disapeared and that's 
it ...

Because Java sucks. This is why Scala and Clojure exist too.

(i just discorverd the font size growth button in altme i'm happy 
)

That was the aA button I mentioned :)

scala clojured never heard about them  sorry

BrianH yes indeed thank you i didn't read that part .... with such 
tiny fonts i don"t read all sorry ...

Scala is the second-most popular language on the Java platform, in 
terms of job postings. It is basically Java's version of F#, but 
better. Clojure is a somewhat Common-Lisp-like language for Java. 
Both of these languages exist because of how breathtakingly bad Java 
sucks for everything Java is used for.

(lisp :) ahahaha and :( say no to car cdr car and all the parenthésis 
that goes with them)

ok so i would run for a rebol on scala :)

The only reason C# and the .NET platform has any traction at all 
is because C# is better than Java at the exact same things that Java 
is used for. And then the .NET runtime is better than the Java runtime 
for not only what people try to use the Java runtime for, but what 
the Java runtime is designed for. It's the libraries that fall short.

but then scala what is the increasing rate in actual state what can 
be done with scala  (do we have the same techs available in java 
or do is it almost it but not quite ?)

but .net runtime only exists in windows plateform and i'm not sure 
that its all windows plateform non X86 based...

Scala is a functional-oop programming language, so it can do everything 
Java can do and a lot more, plus strong concurrency support that 
Java drastically lacks. Its syntax has nothing in common with Java.

mono the opened C# doesn't have a complete compatibility with official 
.net thing  and it's slower than the real thing ...

oop means it's a you can do objects but you are not forced to do 
this ...  it's like php ?

.NET runtime (or semantic equivalent) exists in Silverlight, Mono, 
the iPhone (through MonoTouch and Unity), Second Life, Linux (through 
Intel's port), Windows phones.

twitter is based on scala :) nice but twitter should be based on 
rebol :P

Scala is not like PHP (and stop swearing: words like PHP are not 
fit for polite company). Sacal is more like OCaml, Erlang, F#, etc. 
Loosely though.

sorry for PHP ... that was to get the picture ... of what i ment 
...

It was a bad picture. Now I need mind bleach.

silverlight isn't it a for windows only Microsoft intent to replace 
flash ?

scala use the same dev tools than java like netbeans or eclipse

Silverlight works on Windows, Mac, Windows Phone 7, Meego, and Linux 
(as Moonlight). You are underestimating the Mono project: They have 
a lot of funding and support.

Scala is supported by many Java development tools, mostly IDEs. This 
is a really off-topic conversation. The whole thing should have been 
in the Other Languages group.

ok so basing rebol on moonlight/silverlight or rebol would be a plus 
?

i know that the grphical part of moonlight /silverlight will be extended 
but does rebol can get feet to it ?

ok the main idea behind my ask was more a way to say can't be the 
rebol VM inner source code can be more effective ?

Basing some REBOL-related tools on Silverlight and/or the DLR would 
be a plus. Keep in mind that we don't have to make the whole of REBOL 
run within the JVM or DLR - REBOL is great for making development 
tools, which can be used to generate Silverlight applications, just 
like they generate Flash applications. Or R3 could be used as a library 
by Java, or as a supplemental developemtn tool, or a code generator, 
whatever. Remember, most of REBOL is a set of awesome libraries and 
dialects. REBOL without most of DO or AGG is still useful.

ok so we have a rebol base in a language that means alot of work 
to have it on windows / linux/ macOSX  and some mobile thingies

but then we have extension/ modules what ever things based on moonlight 
and C# easyly portable but then obviously the part that would be 
a better fit to moonlight would be the VID / draw part ... and can 
that really coexists with the rest of rebol ?

let's take an example could a video stream be displayed by a rebol/moonlight 
thing ? using rebol natural easy network  layer to feed the moonlight 
extension for displyaing at screen ?

It's only a lot of work if you add it up. Noone will need all of 
this. The small part that they need will be a smaller bit of work. 
And others will need different things, and will do their own work. 
As long as people contribute back to the community and don't say 
things like "I don't work for free for a project that will bring 
money to someone else", without realizing that you will befefit from 
those other people's contributions, then we will all benefit.

Moonlight has its own network layer and video stream playing abilities 
already. That is not where REBOL will help.

BrianH but tideing the faith of rebol with the faith of moonlight 
is it good ?

Silverlight and Moonlight are good. If you want to make a REBOL browser 
plugin, they are the thing to beat. Flash is not as good, and not 
really competition if it weren't for the installed base.

yeah but most of people use flash ... mostly because of the tools 
and what you can do with the tools rather than of what the result 
perf will be and what the language structure is

BrianH don't forget that mostly flash is used by people who don't 
know what an algorithms is and which i call the "click nation"

Yeah, so we can't compete based on quantity, we have to compete based 
on quality.

R3 is best as its own thing. But it can be used to supplement applications 
in other languages, like Lua. Or it can be used to generate applications 
for other platforms, as a development tool.

could then moonlight and mono be interfaced with other side libraries 
like opengl  can i make a part of my interface as an opengl display 
etc??

Or we can use R3 to solve problems that need solving, where having 
a solution is more important than how. REBOL is great at solving 
problems quickly.

With Silverlight/Moonlight, you don't need a side interface, it has 
a GUI. That GUI will be accellerated by OpenGL or whatever is available. 
With Mono, you can integrate anything.