World: r3wp

so for example, if an application halts due to an error... the stack 
is effectively empty, since its back to the command-line.  :-(

ex:  I added a voluntary 0 / 0 to generate an error.

liquid/add[3]/instigate() [
** Math error: attempt to divide by zero
** Where: / unless cleanup switch foreach either if insti
** Near: / 0 plug/dirty?: plug/valve/purify plug if all [
    plug/re...

>> stack 10
== none

whaooo  you don't even need me to feud anymore nice work guys continue 
that way ;)

this is a welcome change in R3   :-)

>> a: to-integer to-binary red
== 16711680

>> to-tuple to-binary a
== 0.0.0.0.0.255.0.0


as opposed to in R2

>> a: to-integer to-binary red
== 16711680
>> to-tuple to-binary a
== 49.54.55.49.49.54.56.48

to anyone holding back on using R3... with A107, I think we can really 
start to get serious in using R3

after a little bit more work on translating to R3... it seems to 
be much less work than it started out to be   :-D


I've got the basics of my dataflow canvas engine working in R3 (which 
is the basis for GLASS and many other tools of mine).


most of the time spent was in fiddling around with learning the changes 
in R3 view engine itself.   this is a 40kb lib running over another 
50kb lib... and its working as-is (once I removed references to the 
word 'FACE and system/words, mostly).

strange load behaviour.....   it doesn't load a file as rebol data... 
its only a string... I just had to do:

load load %datafile.r

just like if I was doing:

load read %datafile.r

What is in the file?

it seems to be related to the extension....  only a file with .r 
as extension is loaded as data... this insn't very cool.

the file name actually didn't have the .r in my script.

Indeed. LOADing should not be affected by the filename.

hmm, doesn't seem to depend on the extension, but on wethere there 
is an extension or not

can anyone verify this claim before I post it to curecode!
should be run from where you have the r3 view tests installed.

;--------------------------------------------------------------------
rebol [
	title: "crash report for R3 - A107"
]

do %gfx-pre.r

; this works ok 

blk: load http://www.pointillistic.com/open-REBOL/moa/files/a107-draw-block-ok.r

;-------------
; same as above with A SINGLE circle added .
;
; crashes, with   "REBOL system error #1207:  assertion failed "


; adding a few items ALSO creates a windows READ memory exception.
;
; uncomment to provoke crash

;blk: load http://www.pointillistic.com/open-REBOL/moa/files/a107-draw-block-bad.r
;-------------

win: make gob! [size: 500x500]
box: make gob! [size: 500x500]

box/draw: to-draw blk [] ; crashes 


win: make gob! [text: "Basic DRAW test" offset: 200x20 size: 300x300]
append win box

win/text: none
win/color: red
init-view-system
view/options win [
	offset: 200x100
]

I'm testing from winXP

does not crash for me

did you try with the second load line uncommented?

yes

very strange... can you give me link to your compiled version?  I 
would do some tests... could be a compiler issue.  what are you using 
as compiler?

gcc 4.4.2, as cross-compiler

how can I get a specific version of gcc?  AFAIK mingw's online systems 
allow only an old 3.xxx version or the latest 4.5 which doesn't compile 
rebol at all or crashes it.

what os?

linux, via wine

ok, your compile also crashes  on my system... strange!


we need others to test this.... please, if you have a running r3 
A107 try it out so I make as precise a ticket as I can.


if it doesn't crash, download the file and try to add a few (or many) 
draw commands to it so see if it fails at some point.

I reported the LOAD issue mentioned above as bug#1651: 

http://www.curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=1651

Maxim, I get a crash too if I comment the first load and uncomment 
the second. This is with a107 compiled with the MS compiler.

Windows 7 64 bit

What's the point of SYSTEM/CATALOG/ERRORS/:CATEGORY/CODE , how is 
supposed to be used and what are it's limits? 

I've noticed that you can't extend SYSTEM/CATALOG/ERRORS with your 
own error category if that is defined with an code of 997 and above 
in R3:


>> odbc: make object! [code: 996 type: "odbc error" no-handle: [""] 
cannot-connect: ["Cannot connect to" :arg1 "because" :arg2]]     
 ; define my own error category

>> extend system/catalog/errors 'odbc odbc   ; extend standard errors 

>> cause-error 'odbc 'cannot-connect ["CACHWEB Samples" "no such 
DSN"]

** odbc error: Cannot connect to "CACHWEB Samples" because "no such 
DSN"

>> system/catalog/errors/odbc/code: 997   ; too high an error code

>> cause-error 'odbc 'cannot-connect ["CACHWEB Samples" "no such 
DSN"]
** Script error: invalid argument: [
    type: err-type
    id: err-id
    arg1: first args
    arg2: second args
    arg3: third args
]
** Where: make cause-error
>> system/catalog/errors/odbc/code: 996

>> cause-error 'odbc 'cannot-connect ["CACHWEB Samples" "no such 
DSN"]   ; back to normal

** odbc error: Cannot connect to "CACHWEB Samples" because "no such 
DSN"


R2 seems to not pay attention to the error code, at least it doesn't 
choke on values of 997 and above. That limit in R3 seems to be somewhat 
arbitrary?

TL;DR: You can't create error categories of error codes above 996, 
is there a reasoning for that?

Slow progress on your ODBC protocol?

It isn't a protocol yet but rather has a module/function API. ODBC 
database access is working for me as a Windows only host kit extension, 
with UTF8 strings and bound parameters. I'm in code cleaning stage 
and I'm about to support SQLTables and SQLColumns catalogue API functions. 
Sadly, it won't be possible to use it with DATE! values for long 
(see curecode). And, yes, I'm thinking on supporting some ODBC errors 
in their own error category. There are no best practices known to 
me on how to do that, though.

Any example of how rebol can talk to MS Outlook?

Write an email to it? :)

At least that. Close.

If Outlook as a COM interface, you can use that

it does and works using Aton's com lib

Thanks. Found this: http://anton.wildit.net.au/rebol/os/windows/COMLib/

If you need it to be robust, and talk to mtuliple versions of Outlook 
(e.g. used by others who may have a different version), consider 
using Redemption. It is robust and well worth the money IMO.

The above lib fails. Next, Redemption.

I know that a companny has built a full integration to outlook supporting 
more than a single version of outlook... AFAIK they used Anton's 
com lib .

florin, it might just be a config issue.   did you get the comlib 
to do anything within excel?  IIRC Anton's comlib has a few examples 
for excel and word.  getting that to work first will make outlook 
attempts a bit easier.

actually the integration was for an exchange server, but it goes 
through outlook IIRC.

(Did they really? -- Gosh...)

Would COMLib allow me to mess with internet explora...for example: 
insert urls into the address bar to change the website viewed without 
having to open another tab or window?

in theory yes.

Dumb question: How is it that I solve this?

>> set to-word "a" 2
** Script error: a word is not bound to a context
** Where: set
** Near: set to-word "a" 2

There's probably some easier way than this, I hope:

>> x: 1
== 1
>> set bind to word! "a" 'x 2
== 2
>> a
== 2

ok, thanks

wow rebol has become perharps a bit too picking about binding?

did someone forget that REBOL is supposed to be "simple" ?

picking = picky

LOAD loads and binds strings except being told otherwise with /UNBOUND:

>> set load "a" 2
== 2
>> set load/unbound "a" 2
** Script error: a word is not bound to a context
** Where: set
** Near: set load/unbound "a" 6

I don't think it's especially picky the way this is.

I understand how it is... its just that in R2 to-word bound things 
to "global" context by default.