r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3]

Sunanda
26-Oct-2010
[5749x2]
Carl asking for comments (it's a Curecode, not the usual blog RFC, 
so might get overlooked):
   http://www.curecode.org/rebol3/ticket.rsp?id=1719&cursor=1
DNS problem:
   http://www.rebol.com/article/0493.html
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5751]
we can't comment its reviewed... but I would call it  diff   not 
compare.


since if they are equal it would return none, its a much better word 
than compare.
Oldes
26-Oct-2010
[5752]
you can comment, just must be logged in.
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5753]
Agreed, Maxim.
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5754]
yeah... just added a simple comment which makes it obvious that diff 
is a better name.
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5755]
Look at 1718 and 1720 too.
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5756x2]
commented 1720
1718 looks good to me.. though the name is hard to map to the effect 
it has... I didn't find a better one.
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5758]
I think FORFIND was one (worse, and by me) suggestion, when Carl 
brought this up in a blog last year.
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5759]
I just had a flash!!!

when data value [  do something  ]
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5760]
Nothing particularly loop-y or sequency about WHEN, not like *ALL.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5761x3]
we already have difference
I have suggest 'diverge?
ed
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5764x2]
not difference.... diff.
actually difference could handle series .  right now its not used 
on series... or is it?
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5766]
It is, and differently.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5767]
that's the point .. we already have difference .. so we should choose 
a different word
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5768]
It treats the series like sets. One of the group with UNIQUE.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5769]
and a diff should really show all points of difference
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5770]
Divergence ?
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5771x2]
so using 'diff implies more than one gets
( does 3 more characters add much ? )
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5773]
It adds the right part of speech. Grammatical correctness.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5774]
if not diverge? seriesa seriesb [ print "they're equal mate!" ]
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5775]
And it is more exactly on topic than difference or diff.
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5776]
Divergence:  too obscure  a word  time to get the thesaurus... ;-)
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5777]
shorter words are preferable too ... but who cares
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5778]
It's an obscure meaning :) Shorter words are preferable as long as 
they mean the same thing.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5779]
sounds more like the title of a sci fi novel
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5780x2]
But DIVERGE? is a way to add the equivalent meaning, but using REBOL 
naming conventions rather than English.
English doesn't have ? in words :)
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5782x2]
I thought we were programming in rebol?
suffix?  length?
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5784x2]
?  words are logic returning words.  true none false.
(at least that is what they should do.)
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5786]
The base language for the naming of REBOL functions is English. But 
REBOL adds naming conventions that English doesn't have.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5787x2]
what logical computation does 'suffix? do ?
and length? et cetera
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5789x2]
So the ? is the REBOL equivalent to the nce in divergence.
Otherwise, diverge is a verb.
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5791x2]
? should stand for :

  is [something] ?

but its also used as:

  what is [something] ?


though the second form could be used on just about every function 
which isn't a process...  so I don't like that we sometimes add ? 
when we really are asking for a process of some data.
suffix?  is not does this have a suffix?  it's give me the suffix.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5793]
? is also used in Rebol to mean "of"
Maxim
26-Oct-2010
[5794x2]
that is the second form..... 

 what is [something] of ?
of implied if there is an argumetn.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5796]
waste? [ of time ]
BrianH
26-Oct-2010
[5797]
Then would need the nce. Diverge is still an action word. Divergence 
is the noun.
GrahamC
26-Oct-2010
[5798]
Sorry, language is defined by use ... not by dictionaries