r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3]

Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7916]
When did this start?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7917]
Almost half a year ago, at least visibly, in hindsight
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7918]
Other people have the source code don't they?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7919]
No, why would they?
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7920]
Otherwise the community will just rot.
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7921]
Better pinch your nose
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7922x2]
I feel let down. If Carl takes a break he has to entrust the source 
code and development to someone else.
Is there much action on boron?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7924x2]
That makes more of us. The overriding argument for REBOL and its 
closedness was always that Carl was the leader, he always knew best, 
and development always continued
Boron is going steady, but it's an isolated project, much in the 
same style as REBOL. The community is more interested in Red
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7926]
I heard about it. What's red for?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7927]
Programming :-)
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7928x2]
haha
How many people are working on it?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7930]
Four or five or so
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7931]
maturity? what can it do atm?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7932]
One month :-)
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7933]
Why is it more popular than boron? Did the boron guy start red?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7934]
It can do loops, but not indexing, so you could have called me out 
on claiming it can do programming ;-)
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7935]
It seems very low level
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7936]
Yes, so far, but that's only Red/System
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7937]
What are the plans for it?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7938]
Have you read the sites?
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7939x2]
Oh, there's a to do list
I was looking for more of a long term outlook
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7941x2]
Yes, and an extensive specification for Red/System
The roadmap is in the original announcement
Nicolas
10-Apr-2011
[7943x2]
Thanks. How does the community communicate?
google groups or altme?
Kaj
10-Apr-2011
[7945]
Here in the Red group, to the chagrin of the creator. :-) Better 
switch to that
Dockimbel
11-Apr-2011
[7946]
:-)
BrianH
11-Apr-2011
[7947x3]
Ladislav, the two most popular desktop OSes in use today are Windows 
XP and 2000. Both will be and have to be supported by R3, and neither 
is secure enough for a regular person to run without antimalware 
software. We don't want R3 flagged as malware *again* (it already 
happened with one of the early alphas). That is why we are putting 
effort into making R3 more secure.
The R3 process needs to be able to save the %user.r file with the 
current user's permissions in order to allow the user to save their 
preferences. And we don't have a safe place to store the checksum 
of that file to compare against, without also making that checksum 
writeable by the user. That means that the checksum security can't 
be used for %user.r.
It makes me a little sad to realize that in order to keep a copy 
of that early alpha I have to keep it in a passworded compressed 
archive, so antimalware software doesn't delete it. I no longer recommend 
AVG because they refused to remove the false positive from their 
list (they refuse all requests from users of their free products, 
regardless of merit, so you have to buy their paid products to appeal).
Ladislav
12-Apr-2011
[7950]
The R3 process needs to be able to save the %user.r file with the 
current user's permissions in order to allow the user to save their 
preferences.

 - this is the only one I find relevant as far as security concerns 
 are considered. Nevertheless, this does not contradict what I said 
 in any way I can imagine.
BrianH
12-Apr-2011
[7951]
How can any program be secure, if it runs in an insecure environment?

 - by adding its own security constraints, beyond those provided by 
 the environment. We have to support running in an insecure environment 
 since WinXP is such an environment. Oh well.
Ladislav
12-Apr-2011
[7952]
No matter how well you pretend you are able to run securely in a 
compromised environment, it is not true.
BrianH
12-Apr-2011
[7953]
Agreed. You can run more or less securely, but it is really a matter 
of degree. We just don't want to make the extremely common bad decision 
to run WinXP any worse, or else they might blame us for their mistake. 
This has already happened once, so we don't want it to happen again.
Ladislav
12-Apr-2011
[7954]
Do I understand correctly, that there was somebody catching a virus 
and blaming RT for it?
BrianH
12-Apr-2011
[7955x2]
Yup. The last non-public alpha of R3 was flagged as malware. To this 
day, AVG still refuses to remove the (hopefully) false positive from 
its list.
No wait, it was the first public alpha, not the last non-public one.
GrahamC
12-Apr-2011
[7957]
if r3 is a virus, it's not spreading very effectively!
BrianH
12-Apr-2011
[7958x2]
Agreed :(
I'm really hoping to get the SECURE function working again before 
the current version gets flagged as well. SECURE has been turned 
off since a108.
GrahamC
12-Apr-2011
[7960x2]
Unfortunately R3 is not async
Carl's absence continues to block
Ladislav
12-Apr-2011
[7962x2]
Are you serious the SECURE function working may be the difference 
between the R3 being flagged or not?
That looks like a joke to me.
BrianH
12-Apr-2011
[7964x2]
Not really, but then I haven't gotten a straight answer about why 
2.99.4 was flagged either. If you still have a copy of 2.99.4, put 
it in a password-protected compressed archive or else many antimalware 
products will delete it without asking you.
I wish I could find more humor in this though. SECURE not working 
really does bother me a lot; even though I joke about it getting 
R3 flagged as malware, if it actually happened for that reason I 
couldn't argue against that.