World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
older newer | first last |
james_nak 14-Jun-2011 [9128] | Thanks Henrk. |
Kaj 14-Jun-2011 [9129] | There are very easy ways for business owners to prevent a number of classes of speculations |
Oldes 14-Jun-2011 [9130] | I think that it looks on NDA -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement --- very strict as it looks. |
Henrik 14-Jun-2011 [9131] | yes, it's possible that he's instructed to not talk about REBOL (just my speculation). |
Kaj 14-Jun-2011 [9132] | Does it help us? |
Brock 15-Jun-2011 [9133x2] | I didn't hear much about this day job that he has, but I can only hope that it was a contract to finish R3 for a big company and once that project was completed, release it. |
I know, wishful thinking. | |
Jerry 21-Jun-2011 [9135x2] | i've just got a "segmentation fault" while my R3 script was running. :-( |
It's caused by GC. | |
Kaj 21-Jun-2011 [9137] | Brings back memories |
Robert 2-Jul-2011 [9138x2] | I have some knews regarding R3. |
In the last two days I had longer calls with Carl and decided how to move R3 forward. This is how it will be done: | |
Janko 2-Jul-2011 [9140x3] | wowo! |
:) | |
(sorry .. just happy that contact has been reestablished) | |
Robert 2-Jul-2011 [9143x4] | - The RMA team will help to get some burden from Carl's shoulder and work on open issues. This will be setup in that we get partial access to the necessary code parts and can work on these. - We are going to extend our internal testing infrastructure etc on these new R3 releases and run it against our applications we crate - Carl and I will have regular calls to discuss the status and things where we need his advise etc. So, to keep the loop closed and gain more speed - I will meet with Carl in person on 23rd Juli to discuss further things - Unitil that we want to get most administrative setup done, so that we are ready to go |
We are going to drive the priorities by the things RMA needs. This shouldn't be a problem for anyone because if you are going to use R3 for serious development than you will need it as well. The thing is, that we are not going to jump-start for every requested feature etc. We know there is a lot to do and we will work through it step-by-step. And, this is not because we don't care what you all state here. Definetly not. I want to move R3 forward as fast as possible. This needs concentration, focus and pushing to finally get it done. At the end of the day the only thing that counts is, if we make it to make R3 stable enough for prime time development. | |
So, stay tuned and I must say that this is the most promising development for a long time. | |
Let's see if Carl and RMA will make it to deliver on this. Which, still needs to be proofed but I'm not going to stop to push for it. | |
Janko 2-Jul-2011 [9147] | Good news |
GrahamC 2-Jul-2011 [9148] | So, he is opening up parts of the source to you? |
Endo 2-Jul-2011 [9149] | Thank a lot for the news Robert. Currently it is the most important thing is to continue on develeopment of R3, so it is definitely not a problem to drive the priorities by the things RMA needs.. Please keep us informed when you have more news from Carl. |
Pekr 3-Jul-2011 [9150] | Good there is some progress. Does the above mean, that Carl himself is not returning to R3 development yet? What about blogs/twitter? Maybe Carl could open-it for RMA too, but the question is, if you want to blog .... |
Oldes 3-Jul-2011 [9151] | From my point of view it means, that there is no NDA, just that Carl lost interest to be with us and work on REBOL. |
Kaj 3-Jul-2011 [9152] | I think you're right |
Pekr 3-Jul-2011 [9153] | If so, then there is a question, if Carl shoul not consider fully open-sourcing R3. But we most probably know the answer. I would be really intested into Carl officially telling the REBOL community his motives to (dis)contiu with R3 development. It all feels really dishonest, and I wonder, for any eventual future project, how Carl wants to win the trust of ppl. |
Jerry 3-Jul-2011 [9154] | I might not be as good as you guys are, but if there is anything I can do to help R3, let me know. My email: [JerryTsai1218-:-Gmail-:-com]. Let's make R3 hit the beta this year. |
TomBon 3-Jul-2011 [9155] | something like free-rebol bounty ? :))) |
Gregg 3-Jul-2011 [9156] | That's great new Robert. Thanks for the post. |
Henrik 3-Jul-2011 [9157] | Oldes, as far as I can tell, there is going to be an NDA. |
Andreas 3-Jul-2011 [9158x2] | I think Oldes was just referring to speculations made in some channel here on AltME a little while ago. I think the speculation was that one reason for Carl disappearing publicly could be that he is prohibited from talking about REBOL by an NDA-like contract at his current occupation. |
I probably shouldn't spread that speculation further :) | |
Robert 4-Jul-2011 [9160] | Some notes: - We will have an NDA - Carl didn't lost interest, he is full comitted to R3. His contract work is (still) / was very intense. Things get a bit more relaxed there now. |
PeterWood 4-Jul-2011 [9161] | Much kudos to Robert for taking such a powerful initiative from which all of us will benefit. I wish you, RMA and the RMA team every success; you all really deserve it. |
Robert 4-Jul-2011 [9162x2] | Thanks Peter. |
- I / RMA will be the main communication channel. I have access to Rebol-3 twitter and there exists a RMA twitter. - We will continue to work on the R3-GUI and release it as we did before (sometimes there might be longer periods of no-release, if we are doing massive changes) - The main focus will be: fixing bugs, defining and writing down how datatypes are handled WRT conversion, priority, sorting etc. | |
shadwolf 6-Jul-2011 [9164x7] | NDA ? |
LOL AFTER 111 version there zill be a NDA ( non disclosure agreement) but non disclosure agreement to disclose what the emptyness of nothingness ? go ahead please :) | |
Robert I'm happy you say you will continue to work on r3-gui but will that work produce some result ? | |
Carl didn't lost interrest ?? aaaaaaaaahahaha who do you think you are fooling Robert serriously ? | |
wasn't carl some moth ago that was saying the rebol was a commercial faillure and that he needed tto get a real work to feed his familly ? | |
aaaaaaaaahahaah isn't that called loosing interest ? | |
I laughed so much that I'm impatient to comeback in september to see the bunch of new jokes you will have in stock | |
Rebolek 7-Jul-2011 [9171] | Where he said, that it's a commercial failure? |
Kaj 7-Jul-2011 [9172] | In Alphe's imagination |
Geomol 15-Jul-2011 [9173] | Can R3 load and use shared libraries like R2 with load/library ? I see a group named "!REBOL3 /library". Is that about such libraries, or are extensions for that? (Group "!REBOL3 Extensions".) |
Pekr 15-Jul-2011 [9174x2] | There was a bounty, and attempt from Max (not finished IIRC), to bring R2 like DLL interface to R3, to simplify it for users not being able to utilise full extension interface. |
Some ppl found out, that using extension interface is not so hard as it seems though ... | |
Geomol 15-Jul-2011 [9176x2] | Has it been tried to get the source for R2's load/library, make routine! and then the calling from Carl? That seems to me to be a lot easier to start with that code, as it do work. |
I know, it has been tried many times to get sources, but maybe he would agree on such a specific case, as it would be needed in R3 anyway. | |
older newer | first last |