World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
| older newer | first last |
| Claude 20-Feb-2010 [963x5] | new_word: make object! [test: 1] |
test_mod: module [title: "test"][o: make new_work[]] | |
no problem with this..................but | |
when i but new_word into a file new_word.r and test_mod into test_mod.r and i try to import them | |
>> import %new_word.r >> import %test_mod.r ** Script error: new_word word is not bound to a context ** Where: do applier make module do applier make catch if import ** Near: do body obj | |
| PeterWood 20-Feb-2010 [968] | AFAIK, import is for modules and your new_word appears to be an object This suggests that you should use do %new_word.r rather than import %new_word.r |
| Claude 20-Feb-2010 [969] | oki, but even if i use do for new_word. test_mod.r have the same error !!!! |
| Graham 20-Feb-2010 [970x2] | posted feedback that r3 chat is now down for 2 days |
Does r3 chat actually have a built in revision system? | |
| Gregg 20-Feb-2010 [972] | Very nice Ashley. |
| Henrik 20-Feb-2010 [973] | Graham, it has an approval system like devbase, but I don't know about a real revision system. |
| Paul 20-Feb-2010 [974x3] | I put R3 on my host so I could attempt to run some cgi scripts. Anyone know why I would get this error: 12:55-7:00 Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Length: 20 Keep-Alive: timeout=10, max=29 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Type: application/cgi ‹ |
Just a small script: #!/home/paulsite/dist/r3 -c REBOL [] print [<HTML><BODY> now </BODY></HTML>] print "" | |
I got it working. Not sure what that was from though. | |
| Graham 20-Feb-2010 [977x3] | I've created a git repository and stored all the protocol stuff there ... http://github.com/gchiu/Rebol3 |
If anyone wants to collaborate and to add their stuff ... or add RT's stuff ... PM me and I'll add you as a collaborator | |
Note, a lot of the stuff is alpha quality ... but so is R3 :) | |
| BrianH 20-Feb-2010 [980] | Ladislav, objects don't have a 'self field in R3 - the 'self binding is a side-effect of the BIND function. You shouldn't be using IN object 'self in R2 either - use BIND?. |
| Graham 21-Feb-2010 [981] | How do you get the members of an object then? |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [982] | words-of, values-of? |
| Graham 21-Feb-2010 [983] | ok |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [984x2] | hmm, why does not it work? >> foreach word words-of system [print get in system word] core 2.100.97.3.1 7-Feb-2010/4:31:57 ** Script error: Windows word is not bound to a context ** Where: print foreach ** Near: print get in system word |
would it be possible to iterate foreach upon more than one series? :-) something like: foreach [word value] [words-of system values-of system][print [word value]] | |
| Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [986] | print evaluates the word |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [987] | ah, ok ... print mold does it ... |
| Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [988x2] | Still no way to serialize vectors as binaries ? |
i meant, a fast way... | |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [990] | I think that vectors are still due to be implemented ... |
| Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [991] | Not finished, and not usable as is, in any case. While Carl doesn't really need them in some products, nothing will be done. Until that day, I will continue to ask for them every month :) |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [992] | they are part of R3 priorities list |
| Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [993] | FUuuuuuu..... :) |
| Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [994] | and Carl mentioned them IIRC here one or two weeks ago. Guys want images and vectors to work in extensions ... |
| Graham 21-Feb-2010 [995] | Where is all the test code for r3 ? |
| Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [996] | that might be in the r3-alpha world or somewhere in r3 chat. |
| Gregg 21-Feb-2010 [997] | What test code? Henrik and I both did some on R3-alpha, but Carl wanted a simple block format, and I don't know where any of that is. |
| Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [998] | I think that is in the r3-alpha world. I remember Carl writing some docs around it. |
| Ladislav 22-Feb-2010 [999] | objects don't have a 'self field in R3 - interesting, I always thought, that if I hide something, it does not cease to exist... |
| Paul 22-Feb-2010 [1000x2] | 'self is still there. |
>> obj: context [a: does [probe self]]
== make object! [
a: make function! [[][probe self]]
]
>> obj/a
make object! [
a: make function! [[][probe self]]
]
== make object! [
a: make function! [[][probe self]]
]
| |
| Ladislav 22-Feb-2010 [1002] | yes, Paul, that is what I mean |
| Steeve 22-Feb-2010 [1003x3] | it's not exactly what Brian said though :) |
the FIELD (as an exported property) doesn't exists anymore. >> in context [] 'self == none | |
Or still private but not public anymore | |
| BrianH 22-Feb-2010 [1006x3] | Yeah, sorry, I was more exact in the comment of the ticket you wrote. |
In any case, the code that you have been using to demonstrate your complaint (with the exception of Paul's above) is an example of what we are trying to avoid people doing. Don't use IN object 'self, it's a bad idea. Use BIND?. | |
So to discourage that behavior, 'self is hidden as-if with PROTECT/hide (effectively, not really), blocked from modification as-if with PROTECT (effectively, not really), not counted by LENGTH?, not unprotectable by UNPROTECT and only referenceable through BIND block! any-object!. It is unknown by anyone other than Carl whether the field actually exists in the object at all - I would guess that it does, because the alternative seems more complex and that's not his style. In any case, every reasonable effort has been made to discourage its use in any way except in code like Paul demonstrates above. R2's usage of the word was a security hole, and unnecessary once we got the BIND? function, both in R2 and R3. | |
| Steeve 22-Feb-2010 [1009] | >> context [self: "hello"] ** Script error: cannot set self - it is protected ** Where: make context ** Near: make object! blk Was possible within R2 |
| BrianH 22-Feb-2010 [1010x3] | And was a security hole. And so is explicitly blocked. |
Fortunately there is an alternative to the insecure code that was added to R2 later in its life: the BIND? function. It's in R3 as well. | |
The alternative was added later, not the insecurity. | |
| older newer | first last |