World: r3wp
[!REBOL3]
older newer | first last |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [982] | words-of, values-of? |
Graham 21-Feb-2010 [983] | ok |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [984x2] | hmm, why does not it work? >> foreach word words-of system [print get in system word] core 2.100.97.3.1 7-Feb-2010/4:31:57 ** Script error: Windows word is not bound to a context ** Where: print foreach ** Near: print get in system word |
would it be possible to iterate foreach upon more than one series? :-) something like: foreach [word value] [words-of system values-of system][print [word value]] | |
Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [986] | print evaluates the word |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [987] | ah, ok ... print mold does it ... |
Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [988x2] | Still no way to serialize vectors as binaries ? |
i meant, a fast way... | |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [990] | I think that vectors are still due to be implemented ... |
Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [991] | Not finished, and not usable as is, in any case. While Carl doesn't really need them in some products, nothing will be done. Until that day, I will continue to ask for them every month :) |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [992] | they are part of R3 priorities list |
Steeve 21-Feb-2010 [993] | FUuuuuuu..... :) |
Pekr 21-Feb-2010 [994] | and Carl mentioned them IIRC here one or two weeks ago. Guys want images and vectors to work in extensions ... |
Graham 21-Feb-2010 [995] | Where is all the test code for r3 ? |
Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [996] | that might be in the r3-alpha world or somewhere in r3 chat. |
Gregg 21-Feb-2010 [997] | What test code? Henrik and I both did some on R3-alpha, but Carl wanted a simple block format, and I don't know where any of that is. |
Henrik 21-Feb-2010 [998] | I think that is in the r3-alpha world. I remember Carl writing some docs around it. |
Ladislav 22-Feb-2010 [999] | objects don't have a 'self field in R3 - interesting, I always thought, that if I hide something, it does not cease to exist... |
Paul 22-Feb-2010 [1000x2] | 'self is still there. |
>> obj: context [a: does [probe self]] == make object! [ a: make function! [[][probe self]] ] >> obj/a make object! [ a: make function! [[][probe self]] ] == make object! [ a: make function! [[][probe self]] ] | |
Ladislav 22-Feb-2010 [1002] | yes, Paul, that is what I mean |
Steeve 22-Feb-2010 [1003x3] | it's not exactly what Brian said though :) |
the FIELD (as an exported property) doesn't exists anymore. >> in context [] 'self == none | |
Or still private but not public anymore | |
BrianH 22-Feb-2010 [1006x3] | Yeah, sorry, I was more exact in the comment of the ticket you wrote. |
In any case, the code that you have been using to demonstrate your complaint (with the exception of Paul's above) is an example of what we are trying to avoid people doing. Don't use IN object 'self, it's a bad idea. Use BIND?. | |
So to discourage that behavior, 'self is hidden as-if with PROTECT/hide (effectively, not really), blocked from modification as-if with PROTECT (effectively, not really), not counted by LENGTH?, not unprotectable by UNPROTECT and only referenceable through BIND block! any-object!. It is unknown by anyone other than Carl whether the field actually exists in the object at all - I would guess that it does, because the alternative seems more complex and that's not his style. In any case, every reasonable effort has been made to discourage its use in any way except in code like Paul demonstrates above. R2's usage of the word was a security hole, and unnecessary once we got the BIND? function, both in R2 and R3. | |
Steeve 22-Feb-2010 [1009] | >> context [self: "hello"] ** Script error: cannot set self - it is protected ** Where: make context ** Near: make object! blk Was possible within R2 |
BrianH 22-Feb-2010 [1010x3] | And was a security hole. And so is explicitly blocked. |
Fortunately there is an alternative to the insecure code that was added to R2 later in its life: the BIND? function. It's in R3 as well. | |
The alternative was added later, not the insecurity. | |
Paul 22-Feb-2010 [1013] | where is query-string at now? No more system/options/cgi? |
Jerry 22-Feb-2010 [1014x2] | Last night, I dreamed that Carl announced in his R3 Blog that A98 was released. The first thing I did in the morning was to make sure it's real. It's not. ... I need to see a shrink, seriously. |
I am mentally damaged. | |
Paul 22-Feb-2010 [1016] | never mind the query-string thing. I think I got it figured out. Althought RT needs to document this under the R3 wiki section. |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1017] | Jerry ... we all wish for things to proceed faster. However, we have to wait a bit. Hopefully Carl is doing wildly in the HostKit/Extension area, so that guys can proceed with other areas, as GUI for example ... |
Graham 23-Feb-2010 [1018x2] | thought he was working on redoing the r3 docs ... |
There's a real paucity of news at present. | |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1020] | The only news is recent Twitter post: "AltME.com website, DNS, WNS, and various other changes quite disruptive today, but should settle down soon." |
Graham 23-Feb-2010 [1021] | nothing regarding R3 development |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1022] | I know ... |
GiuseppeC 23-Feb-2010 [1023x2] | 2 years ago, in times like this I were really upset: "were are we going ?", "when will it be usable ?", "I need it !" ... Now follow the various REBOL channels with curiosity. I expect nothing. When it will be ready I'll be happy and start using it. |
(* I follow) | |
Graham 23-Feb-2010 [1025] | Expect nothing and that's what you'll get |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1026] | The truth is, that I was claiming to guys here, that we are at 80% of the dev stage, one or more years ago. But we are still there. Unless HostKit is released and contains stuff devs need, we can't move much forward. I hope we are close to that stage. It is just, that we are close to it for several months already :-) |
Graham 23-Feb-2010 [1027] | Everyone ( well, perhaps not Henrik ), is on hold ... just waiting. |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1028] | But there is still lots of work to do for Core too. E.g. tasking, or other stuff listed in priority doc. |
GiuseppeC 23-Feb-2010 [1029] | Graham... things go this way on REBOL. We have to wait... |
Pekr 23-Feb-2010 [1030] | I am encountering a crash, dunno if easily traceable. I start R3, type-in "chat". Then I quit the chat by "q", then I type "demo" .... and R3 crashes ... |
Oldes 23-Feb-2010 [1031] | I'm not on hold. I'm just using only R2 regulary. |
older newer | first last |