World: r3wp

Using gcc, I experience up to 33% changes in some tests from compilation 
to compilation, so that could be.

I guess, it has something to do with, how lucky the compiler is maybe 
to get data on 64bit boundaries and make code parts/data fit in cache 
and such technical things.

Seems that could be tweaked with pragmas, right?

Could be. I need pragmas in a few places, but I haven't dug deeply 
into that area of compilation. It's boring, I think. :) And I haven't 
had time to look at things like LLVM, but that would probably solve 
some problems and speed things up even more.

R3 is typically about a third faster than R2 in my tests on Linux, 
even with my CMS that mostly does text processing

Neither R2 nor R3 considers it to be a problem making this directory 
in WinXP:

make-dir %.../


but the directory is never made, as far as I can tell. Doing it from 
a command prompt returns that the directory already exists.

Do you think this is a bug?

When I try to make three dot dir under Vista, it returns an error, 
and hence R3 hould return an error too imo. Ditto for invalid chars, 
not allowed being a part of the dir names ...

When I trace it, it "sees" the error but returns the path:
...
Trace:  return (word)
Trace:  path (word)
Result: (error)
Result: (error)
Result: (error)
Result: %.../ (file)

There is a cross-platform bug in R3 where it won't see any file or 
directory that starts with two periods, not just . and .. - the ticket: 
http://issue.cc/r3/1899

This may be unrelated though.

It is possible to make this directory under OSX, as far as I can 
see.

The particular error triggered in the Windows console when you try 
to make a directory with only periods in its name is that the directory 
already exists; this is probably a bad error. However, when you try 
to MAKE-DIR directories that already exist in REBOL, it's a noop, 
not an error. That is probably why it's not triggering an error here.

wish for R3 / Topaz / Red / World:

callback! datatype so you can "really" use a lot of nice shared libraries.

Do you have a simple example?

display: make callback! [...] [...]
glutDisplayFunc :display

Red/System has native callbacks already. I'm using them in most library 
bindings

Right. Red/System seems vary nice.

I am waiting for floats to be implemented in Red/System. Is there 
a "math" library that could be used intead?

I've bound the standard C math library already, but it's waiting 
for the floats

With R3 you can just callback functions if you want a synchronous 
call, or callback through an event if you want to go asynchronous.

Still, a generator of marshalling wrapper functions would be nice, 
especially since REBOL and C don't have similar data models.

But R3 can't deal very good with multi-threaded libs. You need to 
trick it: Use async with non or integer value to trigger a sync call 
on Rebol side.

Any info about the algorithms used to construct and perform lookup 
on symbol's tables in R3 ?
People gave some hints back in the day.
But I can't remember who.

Wondering if there is an analogy of

    query/clear system/words

Now that you mention it, I'm wondering that too. There isn't any 
tracking of state changes for R3 objects that I'm aware of, and there's 
nothing like system/words.

Well, it is not a big "disaster" for me, since it is not too hard 
for me to adjust the function I am writing for R3 with just a slight 
modification of the behaviour...

Ladislav, I think you already wrote something like that for R3?

newly-defined?: func [
	{do the given BLOCK and find the newly-defined words}
	block [block!]
	/local old
] [
	old: append append
		defined? system/contexts/lib
		defined? system/contexts/sys
		defined? system/contexts/user
	do block
	exclude defined? system/contexts/user old
]

Cyphre, it's not a good approach in R3

To track newly defined words in a context you can check the source 
of the function INTERN.

I may be completely missing the point, Steeve. How exactly can the 
source of the INTERN function help with detection?

Its tracking newly "created" words in the user context after a binding. 
It's maybe not what you're trying to do but it was in response to 
Cyphre.

What I (essentially) want is described in the help string:

    {do the given BLOCK and find the newly-defined words}

Can the source of INTERN cannot help me with that?

typo: "Can the source of INTERN help me with that?

I probably mistaken the words "newly-defined" for "newly-created"

I originally pointed out how implemented the functionality in R2 
(using the 

    query/clear system/words

expression.

You want to track the "modified" words, right ?

ok

newly-defined
 is confusing :-)

Terminological problem, yes

However, I do not track "modified", since that is a bit more complicated/slower 
than I like.

Still I wonder, what is the so called defined? function ?
Where can I find it ?

Steeve... I guess Ladislav is looking for something like this R2 
helper script:
gbl-test: func [
    code
    /all
    /init {returns string with all global variables set to none}
    /local gbl-list words str_init
][
    words: make block! 50
    str_init: make string! 1000
    gbl-list: query/clear system/words
    do code
    if block? gbl-list: query system/words [
        foreach item gbl-list [
            if any [all value? item] [
                insert tail words to-word item
                if init [
                    insert tail str_init join to-word item ": "
                ]
            ]
        ]
    ]
    if init [
        write clipboard:// join str_init "none"
    ]
    words
]
>> gbl-test [a: 1]
== [a]
>> f: func[a][b: a + 1] gbl-test [f a: 1]
== [a b]

The above script I was using to detect leaking variables

>> gbl-test [ o: context [a: 1] ]
== [o]
>> gbl-test [ o: context [a: 1 set 'b 2] ]
== [b o]

(of course without the init part - that was for my personal use) 
it's pretty old script, I almost forgot I have it:)

Ok ok, but I just want to have a look on the functions Cyphre pointed 
out :)

I suspect something odd ;-)

Ah.. I see... the defined? function is not defined:)

I should try it first, my mistake.

defined?: func either rebol/version >= 2.100.0 [[
	{find all defined words in the given context}
	context [any-object!]
	/local words
]][[
	{find all defined words in the given context}
	context [object!]
	/local words	
]][
	words: first context
	remove-each word words [not value? word]
	words
]

ah, bad code, needs correction