r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 Host Kit]

Maxim
1-Nov-2010
[659]
Air probably is better (more polished) than their own gui architecture. 
 though they might have had really cool opportunities if they used 
elate instead.  things like flipping an application's gui from one 
tablet to another.

nothing prevents them from adding elate later.
BrianH
1-Nov-2010
[660]
And nothing prevents them from having the (much better) QNX programmers 
do the work :)
Maxim
1-Nov-2010
[661]
yep.
Pekr
1-Nov-2010
[662]
elate? From Tao? It does not exist anymore ...
Maxim
1-Nov-2010
[663]
ah.. yes... thats' true... I'm mixing the names... sorry... its photon.
ssolie
1-Nov-2010
[664x2]
Tao? they were going to be the kernel for the new AmigaAnywhere platform... 
good times :)
(yes, it went defunct a while back)
Carl
2-Nov-2010
[666x3]
http://github.com/carls/R3A110-- a temp test area for Host-Kit A110
Only the linux libr3.so at this time. Will attempt to add the windows 
lib.
Windows lib added to repository
Kaj
3-Nov-2010
[669x2]
So the Amiga is first from non mainstream OSes. Which one do we choose 
next? Any mobile OS takers here? :-)
Petr, thanks for considering Syllable mainstream :-)
Pekr
3-Nov-2010
[671x2]
Kaj - I consider Syllable being covered, no? :-) I know there is 
not specific Syllable port, but it works somehow, no? :-)
Of course - from non-mainstream OSes, I would choose - QNX, Haiku, 
Aros, Syllable, MorphOS .....
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[673]
Here is the problem with OS X host-kit release:
http://www.rebol.com/r3/docs/osx-linker-symbols.html
GrahamC
4-Nov-2010
[674x2]
So, we can have Android instead?
or ARM?
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[676]
Carl, what version of GCC are you using on OSX?
What happens if instead of
  

  gcc -dynamiclib -exported_symbols_list exported -o a.lib a.o b.o

you do

  gcc -dynamiclib -Wl,-x -o a.lib a.o b.o
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[677]
Got an ARM?
GrahamC
4-Nov-2010
[678]
and a LEG
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[679x2]
Was waiting for that. ;)
checking...
GrahamC
4-Nov-2010
[681x2]
I have this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2
Intel XScale IXP420 CPU
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[683]
Andreas: same result.
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[684]
What version of GCC?
GrahamC
4-Nov-2010
[685]
The Plug computers all use ARM too
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[686]
(gcc -v)
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[687]
gcc or -Wl,-v ?
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[688]
gcc
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[689]
gcc 4.0.1
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[690]
ld -v?
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[691]
cctools-590.23.2
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[692x2]
ouch
gcc -Wl,-v also results in cctools?
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[694x2]
collect version 4.0.1
and then same as ld above
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[696]
If you download this:
http://bolka.at/2009/misc/exports.tar.gz

extract and make
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[697]
what is it?
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[698x2]
foo.c, bar.c and a makefile
should actually be pretty much the same as what you are doing. only 
that i have this exact constellations of files working fine on osx 
with gcc 4.0.1.
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[700]
1 min
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[701]
will have to check what linker that used, though
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[702x3]
same result as given in my example
I seem to remember from last time we tried this... there's a special 
linker tool required on OS X.
But, it was a while ago, so I could be wrong.
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[705]
i think my attempt was linking with GNU ld
Carl
4-Nov-2010
[706]
So, I just wanted to post the doc above... and see if there's anyone 
who wants Host-Lib on OS X and is willing to solve the problem in 
some reasonable way.
Andreas
4-Nov-2010
[707x2]
I think the reasonable way is to get you a reasonable linker.
I assume you are on OSX 10.4 ("Tiger")?