World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2198] | Compiling /users/administrator/Red/test.reds ... *** Compiler Internal Error: Script Error : Invalid path value: 1 *** Where: comp-either *** Near: [emitter/branch/over/adjust/on c-true negate offset expr/1] |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2199] | Weird error... |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2200] | Yeah |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2201x2] | Oh I see what's wrong, let me fix that |
Fix pushed. | |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2203] | Thanks! Good turnaround again :-) |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2204] | Took me some time, had to run all the tests suite several times, refactor the code and find a meaningful commit log message. ;-) |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2205x6] | :-) |
Jocko, input-line works both on WINE and on Linux, so I have no reason to believe it wouldn't work on Windows. What is your code that doesn't work? | |
Oldes, same for print-integer and print-1. What is your code that doesn't work? | |
Next: | |
dummy: func [return: [integer!]] [0] either as-logic dummy [ no ][ no ] | |
*** Compiler Internal Error: Script Error : first expected series argument of type: series pair event money date object port time tuple any-function library struct event *** Where: opposite? *** Near: [first select/skip opp-conditions cond 2] | |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2211x2] | Having a quick look at this error. |
Seems related to my previous fix. | |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2213] | Yeah, was to be expected |
PeterWood 20-Jun-2011 [2214] | Added two tests to reflect the two cases above to cast-test.reds. It now fails with a compliation error. |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2215] | Fix pushed. |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2216] | Thanks, both |
Dockimbel 20-Jun-2011 [2217x3] | Peter, the compilation error in the new type casting tests was not the right one. Variable initialization cannot happen in EITHER blocks now since today's following commit: https://github.com/dockimbel/Red/commit/31b87b9565004574174ba3bf02b4dfaa2db665f2 |
That change was required to fix issue #84. | |
Kaj: you're welcome. But no more fixes until tomorrow, bed time here. | |
Kaj 20-Jun-2011 [2220] | OK then, I'll release you from your duties for the duration of eight (8) hours ;-) |
PeterWood 20-Jun-2011 [2221] | Thanks for the pointing out the initaliasation changes and fixing the tests. |
Gregg 21-Jun-2011 [2222] | Great to see continued activity and progress on Red. |
jocko 21-Jun-2011 [2223x2] | Kaj, I tested this morning, input-line works under Windows My mistake was that I did not allocate the input buffer by in: allocate 255 but by in: "" , which is not really an allocation |
on an other hand, I cannot simply include the C-library in my script by : #include %C-library.reds instead, I must extract the used functions. (here _input-line and input-line) The error message at the compilation is not visible in the console, because a large amount of text is printed. Maybe a double declaration. Any idea ? | |
Dockimbel 21-Jun-2011 [2225x2] | Jocko, this might be caused by a duplicate definition of ALLOCATE and FREE, but Kaj removed them from the C-library in the last revision. I just downloaded last revision and tested, I can include it in my scripts without any issue. |
Gregg: thanks for your kind support. | |
Oldes 21-Jun-2011 [2227x3] | print functions from Kaj's C-library has different precedence than ordinary print/prin when you call the red's exe from REBOL using CALL/console command. |
Which means.. if I have code: print-1 "int %d" 1 print "hello" I get in REBOL console: >> call/console %builds/test.exe hello int 1== 0 | |
in CMD: int 1hello | |
Dockimbel 21-Jun-2011 [2230x5] | Confirmed here too (on Windows). PRINT-1 is printing after every other PRINT calls in a script. |
It seems that they are not using the same streams. | |
This article explains the issue in the second note: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/190351/en-us | |
So flushing the C I/O streams is the solution: print-1 "int %d" 1 flush-file null print "hello" works fine. | |
A long-term solution could be to disable buffering of C's stdout stream, using a call to setvbuf(). It requires passing a stream pointer, so I am not sure this is doable now. | |
Kaj 21-Jun-2011 [2235x7] | The issue is that PRINT and PRIN use syscalls directly, and thus don't go through the buffering that the C library does on all I/O |
In particular, the standard I/O streams stdin and stdout are line buffered. Flushing them is often more forceful than necessary: the same effect is achieved by printing a newline | |
Also, when doing an input-line on Linux, stdout is flushed automatically, so you can print a question with a prompt directly behind it | |
On Windows, every print operation seems to be flushed automatically. I haven't seen it ordered incorrectly when intermixed with the Red syscalls functions | |
The differing behaviour is indeed very confusing, but I don't think the proper solution is to disable buffering. In my opinion, when Red uses the C library, PRINT and PRIN should also go through it | |
NULL can't be used any more as the return value for a function that normally returns a pointer: | |
Compiling /users/administrator/Red/Red-ZeroMQ-binding/examples/reply-server.reds ... *** Compilation Error: wrong return type in function: receive *** expected: [message!], found: [none] *** in file: %/users/administrator/Red/Red-ZeroMQ-binding/examples/reply-server.reds *** in function: receive *** at: [] | |
Dockimbel 21-Jun-2011 [2242x2] | It is caused by NULL clashing with EITHER return type static analysis. I am giving NULL an any-pointer! pseudo-type to solve that. |
I have pushed a new commit that should fix your issue. | |
Kaj 21-Jun-2011 [2244] | Works. Thanks again! The 0MQ binding compiles again after some time |
Dockimbel 21-Jun-2011 [2245] | About using C functions for printing, is there one that don't interpret backslash-escaped characters? |
Kaj 21-Jun-2011 [2246x2] | Probably if you use print-1 "%s" STRING, because the second is not the format string |
Actually, I've already had print-1 "\n" ... print "\n" instead of newline. Aren't the escapes interpreted at compile time, only in literal strings? | |
older newer | first last |