World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Pekr 24-Jun-2011 [2538] | And then? RED language implementation, generating Red/System code? That will actually mean reimplementing all REBOL natives - how long do you expect it to take to get to an alpha? One year? More? |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2539x2] | The next step will be working on Red memory manager, then Red compiler (including reimplementing all the base natives). Alpha should be available around September, 1st. |
Yes, I should take the Red->Red/System compilation road. | |
Pekr 24-Jun-2011 [2541] | September 1st for the compiler, right? Not the whole REBOL reimplementation? You can't be so fast :-) And if you are fast, you should rename to SupaRED :-) |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2542x3] | I said "base natives", so not a whole REBOL reimplementation. |
I will detail the milestones on red-lang.org just after the beta announcement. | |
Peter, the %function-test.reds script is missing from your last commit. | |
PeterWood 24-Jun-2011 [2545] | It seems to be there : https://github.com/dockimbel/Red/blob/58afdfbf99699c7bcd3f57231edae9c495e00f99/red-system/tests/source/function-test.reds |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2546] | Ah...let me check why precisely the test script is complaining... |
PeterWood 24-Jun-2011 [2547] | It's in the wrong place. sorry. It's in source/ when it should be in source/units |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2548] | I'll wait for your new commit then. |
PeterWood 24-Jun-2011 [2549] | (I messsed up the copy from Windows to OS X.) |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2550] | Porting to OSX should be done asap, after the beta announcement. |
PeterWood 24-Jun-2011 [2551] | That will be fantastic!!! |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2552x2] | Yes, I know a few potential Red/System testers that are waiting for that too. |
Thanks for the fix, pulling it and testing right now. | |
PeterWood 24-Jun-2011 [2554] | No problem. Hope it's okay now. |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2555] | Yes, I am just adding another assertion in the f1-f function body to verify that the word lookup is done on local context first. |
Kaj 24-Jun-2011 [2556x2] | Yes, I should take the Red->Red/System compilation road. |
Did you change your opinion on this? Wasn't the plan originally to compile Red directly? | |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2558x2] | Right, I wanted to make a direct native compilation for Red too, but emitting Red/System might be shorter way to reach the goal. |
As Red/System is a dialect of Red, the compilation should be quite easy to achieve. | |
Kaj 24-Jun-2011 [2560x2] | Updated the C and 0MQ bindings for the unset EITHER return value fix |
However, their functioning is still hampered by the not as-logic function! bug, which affects half my functions | |
Dockimbel 24-Jun-2011 [2562] | I won't be able to get back to Red before tomorrow. |
Kaj 24-Jun-2011 [2563] | No problem, it's just a note about the state, and it's ready for the solution |
Kaj 25-Jun-2011 [2564] | Thanks for the fix! The bindings are fully functional now |
Dockimbel 25-Jun-2011 [2565] | Cool! |
Kaj 26-Jun-2011 [2566x2] | I've overhauled the design of the 0MQ binding. The high level interface is now better tuned. Memory management is moved out of it, so it's more efficient. No more thrashing of the allocator for message containers |
Message holders don't leak memory anymore, but now the payload of sent messages leaks, due to what seems to be a bug in callbacks. More in the tracker | |
Andreas 26-Jun-2011 [2568x2] | The callback is called just fine, but seems to corrupt something while running. |
Thanks for the report, in any case. | |
Dockimbel 27-Jun-2011 [2570] | Kaj: good to know that you working on improving the 0MQ binding. I will have a look on the callback issue. |
Kaj 27-Jun-2011 [2571] | Thanks for the first fix, but it doesn't work yet |
Dockimbel 27-Jun-2011 [2572x3] | Right, Andreas fix shouldn't change anything, see my comment: https://github.com/dockimbel/Red/commit/89f2533a5712a389ae15220be3ca75e75f4728c2 |
I will run his test case step by step to see what's wrong. | |
Works fine on Windows, so it looks like a Linux-specific issue... | |
Oldes 27-Jun-2011 [2575] | When we can expect support for decimal numbers? |
Kaj 27-Jun-2011 [2576] | You mean floating point? |
Oldes 27-Jun-2011 [2577] | yes |
PeterWood 27-Jun-2011 [2578] | I'm pretty certain that Nenad has said that he won't be adding binary floating point numbers to Red/System as they will not be needed to build the Red runtime. So at the moment, I would only expect them once Red is available. |
Kaj 27-Jun-2011 [2579x2] | Not anymore, because he has now decided to compile Red to Red/System, so Red/System will need full support |
I think that's a good thing, but it may still be wise to postpone the implementation. Having Red will enable more people to contribute, but on the other hand, the lack of floating point is blocking a few contributors now | |
Dockimbel 27-Jun-2011 [2581] | Floating point support should be added to Red/System if my tests shows that I can safely do the Red->Red/System compilation, else it will be supported at Red level. Anyway, it is not a priority for me, so it probably won't be added before Q4 2010 (unless someone wants to contribute by adding it to Red/System). |
Oldes 27-Jun-2011 [2582] | Q4 2010 is in the past... :) but thanks for the info. I can wait. |
Dockimbel 27-Jun-2011 [2583x2] | Sorry, Q4 2011. |
Those years are passing too fast. :-) | |
Mchean 27-Jun-2011 [2585] | but at least Red seems to be keeping up |
Kaj 28-Jun-2011 [2586] | Andreas' fixes to callbacks on Linux work now. I've enabled them in the 0MQ binding and with that, the binding is now pretty much production ready |
Dockimbel 28-Jun-2011 [2587] | Andreas did a great debugging work on that. |
older newer | first last |