r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Red] Red language group

Andreas
26-Jun-2011
[2569]
Thanks for the report, in any case.
Dockimbel
27-Jun-2011
[2570]
Kaj: good to know that you working on improving the 0MQ binding. 
I will have a look on the callback issue.
Kaj
27-Jun-2011
[2571]
Thanks for the first fix, but it doesn't work yet
Dockimbel
27-Jun-2011
[2572x3]
Right, Andreas fix shouldn't change anything, see my comment: https://github.com/dockimbel/Red/commit/89f2533a5712a389ae15220be3ca75e75f4728c2
I will run his test case step by step to see what's wrong.
Works fine on Windows, so it looks like a Linux-specific issue...
Oldes
27-Jun-2011
[2575]
When we can expect support for decimal numbers?
Kaj
27-Jun-2011
[2576]
You mean floating point?
Oldes
27-Jun-2011
[2577]
yes
PeterWood
27-Jun-2011
[2578]
I'm pretty certain that Nenad has said that he won't be adding binary 
floating point numbers to Red/System as they will not be needed to 
build the Red runtime. So at the moment, I would only expect them 
once Red is available.
Kaj
27-Jun-2011
[2579x2]
Not anymore, because he has now decided to compile Red to Red/System, 
so Red/System will need full support
I think that's a good thing, but it may still be wise to postpone 
the implementation. Having Red will enable more people to contribute, 
but on the other hand, the lack of floating point is blocking a few 
contributors now
Dockimbel
27-Jun-2011
[2581]
Floating point support should be added to Red/System if my tests 
shows that I can safely do the Red->Red/System compilation, else 
it will be supported at Red level. Anyway, it is not a priority for 
me, so it probably won't be added before Q4 2010 (unless someone 
wants to contribute by adding it to Red/System).
Oldes
27-Jun-2011
[2582]
Q4 2010 is in the past... :) but thanks for the info. I can wait.
Dockimbel
27-Jun-2011
[2583x2]
Sorry, Q4 2011.
Those years are passing too fast. :-)
Mchean
27-Jun-2011
[2585]
but at least Red seems to be keeping up
Kaj
28-Jun-2011
[2586]
Andreas' fixes to callbacks on Linux work now. I've enabled them 
in the 0MQ binding and with that, the binding is now pretty much 
production ready
Dockimbel
28-Jun-2011
[2587]
Andreas did a great debugging work on that.
Kaj
28-Jun-2011
[2588]
Yep
Andreas
28-Jun-2011
[2589]
Thanks. Good to hear that it's now working for you as well, Kaj.
Gregg
28-Jun-2011
[2590]
Very cool. Thanks to all of you for coordinating on this.
Robert
29-Jun-2011
[2591]
Is it possible to compile R3 extensions right out-of-the-box? That 
would be pretty cool.
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2592]
Robert: yes, as soon as we add DLL generation support in Red/System.
Oldes
29-Jun-2011
[2593]
it will not be much useful without floats ;-)
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2594]
Nice try :-)
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2595]
You'll still have to implement the R3 extensions interface
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2596]
The 64-bit integer support might also be required in Red/System for 
that.
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2597x2]
Indeed, it doesn't seem to be possible to get away without that
Once there are 64 bits values, it may be possible to shuffle them 
as floating point values between libraries, without Red being aware 
what they're used for
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2599]
Good point.
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2600]
When floats are passed to C functions, can they be in normal registers 
or must they be in FPU registers?
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2601]
If the calling convention is cdecl, they are just pushed on stack.
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2602]
That seems like a nice shortcut, then
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2603x2]
That would only work for literal float values.
If you use a variable, you need to pass thru the registers.
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2605]
The FPU registers?
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2606x2]
In the float case, yes FPU registers.
IA32 32-bit registers can't hold C double floats (64-bit).
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2608x3]
I've started working on a cURL binding. It can print the cURL version 
now :-)
I could call it a port from the R3 binding, but it will be more like 
a rewrite
The dynamics in Red are quite different
Dockimbel
29-Jun-2011
[2611x4]
You mean in Red/System. Red does not exist yet.
I will improve the web site that make that difference more clear.
Red/System can hardly be compared to REBOL, they don't live at the 
same level of abstraction.
Great to know you are working on a new binding. Let me know when 
you will put it online, so I can add a link from red-lang.org.
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2615x2]
As long as Red proper doesn't exist, I use Red to refer to Red/System 
:-)
I'm careful not to do that in publications, though
Andreas
29-Jun-2011
[2617]
http://rebol.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-ZeroMQ-binding/doc/trunk/COPYRIGHT.txt
refers to Red :)
Kaj
29-Jun-2011
[2618]
Ah, yes, because it will be a binding for Red, even though the binding 
is written in Red/System