World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Dockimbel 5-Jul-2011 [2688] | hehe, again on OSNews! Thanks Kaj! |
Kaj 5-Jul-2011 [2689x2] | My pleasure |
As long as you keep Red relevant for Syllable, I can get it on OSNews ;-) | |
Dockimbel 5-Jul-2011 [2691] | Sounds like an invitation to rapidly fix the cURL binding issue. ;-) |
Kaj 5-Jul-2011 [2692x2] | Yeah, it's a tricky one |
I was going to ask you if you considered sending the beta to plnews.org, but it seems to be gone | |
Dockimbel 5-Jul-2011 [2694x2] | If you can provide a minimal example exhibiting the issue, I should be able to locate the problem from the disassembled code. |
I will make post a news on freshmeat.net tonight (I still have some things to change on the web site). | |
Kaj 5-Jul-2011 [2696x2] | I'm not used to working at that low level, so I'm moving a bit slowly on it |
We're becoming popular. The trolls are very quick to respond now | |
Dockimbel 5-Jul-2011 [2698] | :-) |
Kaj 5-Jul-2011 [2699x4] | http://development.syllable.org/documentation/introduction/part-1.html |
GDB on Syllable currently only supports real-time debugging, as crashed applications do not generate a core" file (crash dump)." | |
If GDb still works, I guess that prevents me from getting a backtrace | |
The kernel log is probably the best backtrace we can get | |
Andreas 5-Jul-2011 [2703x3] | real-time debugging should be fine. |
(unless that means something different than i suspect it does.) | |
1. compile a binary using red as usual 2. instead of running the binary directly, run it via gdb: $ gdb builds/hello (gdb) run 3. when the program segfaults, you should be back in gdb 4. print a backtrace using "backtrace": (gdb) backtrace | |
Kaj 5-Jul-2011 [2706x4] | The problem with the current GDb on Syllable is that it doesn't know how to load shared libraries, so it can't load cURL |
backtrace says it has no stack | |
The issue with shared libraries seems to be limited to the fact that cURL can use libdl. I don't know what was different now, but I got a GDb trace. Will put it on the tracker | |
The crashes seem to happen when cURL calls the C library, so outside the Red program. I'm not sure it's useful to disassemble a minimal Red example | |
Jerry 5-Jul-2011 [2710] | I have 37,000 followers in Sina Weibo (aka Chinese Twitter), Most of my follower's are programmers. I've just mentioned Red in Sina Weibo. I hope that will make Red be noticed in China. I would like to thank Dockimbel for Red. |
Dockimbel 6-Jul-2011 [2711] | Jerry: thank you! 37k followers, that's huge! |
Henrik 6-Jul-2011 [2712] | silly question: is it possible now to build a CSV parser in Red? |
Dockimbel 6-Jul-2011 [2713] | There is no Red yet, only Red/System which is a low-level dialect. So, yes it is possible, but there's no special feature that would help you much for that task. |
Henrik 6-Jul-2011 [2714] | ok, I was just looking into the idea if it was possible to build one with better performance than what I currently can. |
Dockimbel 6-Jul-2011 [2715] | It will probably be much faster than the one you could write in REBOL, but you'll have to do all the memory management manually. |
Henrik 6-Jul-2011 [2716] | ok, thanks |
Kaj 6-Jul-2011 [2717] | The parsing functions in the C library binding can get you halfway |
Kaj 7-Jul-2011 [2718] | Got the cURL binding to work on Syllable, starting from Andreas' example. :-) Will research some more and report on the tracker |
Dockimbel 7-Jul-2011 [2719] | Good news! |
Maxim 8-Jul-2011 [2720x2] | just found this... it could be a good reference for low-level bit handling in Red. though the code is in C, its probably easier to understand this way and convert to Assembly after (when no comparable machine instruction exists). http://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html |
it has soooo many variations and its been thouroughly tested and analysed by thousands of people. | |
Steeve 8-Jul-2011 [2722] | good sauce |
Dockimbel 8-Jul-2011 [2723x2] | Bookmark: "Calling conventions for different C++ compilers and operating systems" http://www.scribd.com/doc/51814542/36/Relocation-of-executable-code |
Right link should be rather: http://www.scribd.com/doc/51814542/calling-convention | |
Andreas 8-Jul-2011 [2725] | And straight from the source (I think we already had this here in the past): http://www.agner.org/optimize/calling_conventions.pdf |
Dockimbel 8-Jul-2011 [2726] | You're right, and it looks like I missed it last time. Thanks for giving the right source link. |
Dockimbel 9-Jul-2011 [2727x4] | Got a very simple Red/System program running on OS X: Red/System [ ] quit 42 ;-) |
It took me a few hours to write the file emitter but a full day of debugging to make it work. It seems that the issue was related to stricter stack alignment requirement on OS X (16 bytes alignment) and a different ABI for syscalls. It currently works thanks to a few hacks, but I need to extend the IA-32 emitter to implement these new requirements in order to make it output correct code for OS X. | |
Rebolek: I think that your first implementation should work once I upgrade the compiler. | |
For those curious about Mac OS X low-level ABI for function calls: http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/LowLevelABI/130-IA-32_Function_Calling_Conventions/IA32.html | |
Ashley 9-Jul-2011 [2731] | Doc, great news for those of us who primarily develop on OS X these days. |
Kaj 9-Jul-2011 [2732x6] | Not only those. I appreciate the ability to target OS X without having to run it or know anything about it :-) |
16 Bytes stack alignment is also preferred/required for MMX/SSE | |
It seems GCC always uses it | |
http://www.cs.uaf.edu/2010/fall/cs301/lecture/10_27_sse.html | |
It also seems it's only required for system calls on OS X | |
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/612443/why-does-the-mac-abi-require-16-byte-stack-alignment-for-x86-32 | |
older newer | first last |