World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
GrahamC 17-Aug-2011 [3003] | should upload it to the red program repository |
jocko 18-Aug-2011 [3004] | +1 |
shadwolf 18-Aug-2011 [3005x4] | PeterPaint aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahaah ... PetPaint would have been out of limit ? |
hexadecimals used fort event trigger comparaison could be holded in a meaning word ? | |
Impresive Kaj can you do us a set of widgets in SDL or just the smallest possible VID and the widgets will be designed later | |
I really like the Idea of VID a single face that as all possibilities and you just activated /deactivate the parts you want or not this is for me the core meaning of VID. | |
Dockimbel 18-Aug-2011 [3009x2] | Looks very nice Kaj! Is your SDL binding available to download somewhere yet? |
Re RTTI: One drawback is that you loose arguments type-checking, so some errors won't be caught at compile-time. | |
Kaj 18-Aug-2011 [3011x3] | Yes, it makes things a step more dynamic, so you move some of the checking to runtime. But that's actually the point: you can then develop interfaces that can be loosely compatible with a time range of interface versions. It's the philosophy of static everything versus declarative everything in REBOL and XML. In the beginning of computing, static seemed more correct, but these days it has turned out that everything has to be able to withstand change as well as possible |
If you look at the Win32 API, for example, it's a huge mess of sets of deprecated interfaces that were replaced by new sets with slightly extended interfaces. So it's not only an issue in unreliable Internet programming, but also in low-level system programming | |
The SDL binding is not published yet. It's an experimental mess currently. I have been banging my head on getting sound to work | |
james_nak 22-Aug-2011 [3014x2] | Not that any of you would have issues with creating such a thing but here is an R2 version of the Colineau's (Jocko) Google translate app he created in Red. (Note, I didn't add all of the routines but if you take a look at Colineau's code it's all there.) Also, the female voice (use gTTS function instead of TTS function) is much better than the male in my opinion unless you want to hear "This is Amiga Speaking." and feel nostalgic. rebol [ title: {googletts.r} date: 20-aug-2011 usage: {gtts "Hello World." or tts "Hello World."} ] lib: load/library %tts-jc.dll TTS: make routine! [ lpStr [string!] return: [integer!] ] lib "TTS" gTTS: make routine! [ lpStr [string!] return: [integer!] ] lib "gTTS" ----- I created some nice memory tools for my son who is in law school with this by setting up the string and tweaking it and then recording it (I use Sound Forge). If I get some free time I'd like to create a dialect so that I can make an interactive tool with visual reinforcements. As I mentioned, you have to tweak the words and punctuation and that creates a problem with just reading the text normally, hence I'll require a mechanism to sort all that out. Oh, the dll is in the http://www.colineau.fr/rebol/downloads/demoTTS_Red.zip file |
Sorry I meant to post this in Core. :-( | |
Kaj 22-Aug-2011 [3016x2] | For the demos at the upcoming conferences, I've started working on a GTK+ binding |
I can open a GTK window now | |
Dockimbel 22-Aug-2011 [3018x2] | Nice! |
Have you finished with your SDL demos? | |
Kaj 22-Aug-2011 [3020x2] | No, I'm doing several things in parallel now |
The SDL callback for playing sound crashes. It's in an extra thread, so it's hard to debug | |
jocko 22-Aug-2011 [3022] | just a detail on my dll : tts uses the SAPI4 or SAPI5 voice synthesis normally installed on the PC (you can install other voices), while gTTS uses the Google TTS api. For the details on the SAPI5 interface, see http://www.colineau.fr/rebol/R3_extensions.html#section-2 |
james_nak 22-Aug-2011 [3023] | Thanks Jocko, that makes more sense since the female voice is so much better. |
Pekr 23-Aug-2011 [3024] | Kaj - as you are so fast in creating bindings, you can port View engine as well, so that we coul use VID with RED later :-) |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3025] | I already told you: we can't use it. Besides, Red won't be compatible with REBOL, so it won't be able to run VID. The same goes for the View engine: it's very REBOL specific |
Henrik 23-Aug-2011 [3026] | it does not prevent anything conceptually similar to be made, however. |
Pekr 23-Aug-2011 [3027x3] | Kaj - I expect RED being kind-of compatible with REBOL, or I am not interested in it. I expect we will have parser, and REBOL-like constructs. We don't need 100% compatibility for porting. It is just that I thought that View (apart from its possible licence restrictions) is significantly smaller to port, when comparing to things like GTK or SDL? |
Maybe one day it will come anyway, if Carl does not appear anytime in foreseable future. Add 2 months, and we are one year in an R3 develompent limbo ... | |
I mean - maybe one day RMA ports it themselves :-) | |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3030] | Any technical considerations are moot with software that you're not allowed to port |
Pekr 23-Aug-2011 [3031] | btw - do we know the licence of View engine? |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3032x2] | No, that's the point |
The new casting implementation has broken PeterPaint | |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3034x3] | Ah, I was expecting some regressions... |
I am working on some new type casting fixes, they might fix your issue. I am not sure I'll be able to release them today, probably tomorrow. | |
The following class of expressions is not emitting correct native code: A <op> B, where A is an integer! expression and B is byte! variable. | |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3037] | It has also broken the cURL binding |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3038] | I tried to not break anything with this sensible commit, so I ensured that all current unit tests were passing as long as all my test apps (including Red's memory allocator). It would be useful to identify your regressions, so we can add new regression tests and avoid that in the future. |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3039] | I'll wait for your fixes. It's not useful to hunt for deep bugs that are already known |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3040] | Do you have runtime errors reported? |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3041] | No, I'm getting internal compiler errors during compilation, so I don't even know where they are in my source; and no pixels drawn in SDL |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3042] | Oh, those are easier to fix. :-) |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3043] | Not for me |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3044x2] | To locate internal compiler error, just run the compiler in verbose mode (like -v 5), and watch for "expr: " outputs, that should help you locate the part of your source causing that. |
Usually, the last "expr: " output is enough to locate the error. | |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3046] | Sorry, but I don't really have time to do such deep debugging |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3047x2] | The "expr: " outputs code from Red/System source, not compiler source. |
At least, you'll know which expression in your Red/System app is causing the issue. | |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3049] | I'll look into it when the errors are still there with your fixes |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3050] | You can also send me the source code, and I'll do the internal debugging, it is probably a minor error. |
Kaj 23-Aug-2011 [3051] | If you want, you can compile the cURL binding for one |
Dockimbel 23-Aug-2011 [3052] | I've released a fix for your compilation issue. |
older newer | first last |