World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Dockimbel 19-Sep-2011 [3447] | In such case, you could use any function as callbacks (as all functions calling convention would be known at compile-time). |
BrianH 19-Sep-2011 [3448x2] | Ah, cool, I was worried that you were only going to make explicitly marked functions usable as callbacks, rather than all functions. |
You can omit the 'stdcall attribute for stdcall callbacks? | |
Dockimbel 19-Sep-2011 [3450x2] | If we drop 'callback attribute, 'stdcall wouldn't be needed, as it is the default convention used by Red/System. |
This might be the best option currently, as it would just require users to change 'callback to 'cdecl in most cases and just drop the 'callback attribute in other cases. | |
BrianH 19-Sep-2011 [3452] | Then we could just specify 'callback if we want the system to guess, 'cdecl if we know it's that, and nothing if stdcall. |
Dockimbel 19-Sep-2011 [3453] | No, it can't work that way. If 'callback is used, then we need the error system to catch the unresolved cases, so we need to set initially every callback function calling convention as "unknown" instead of stdcall. For the unresolved cases, the user must be able to set manually the convention, so he needs both 'cdecl and 'stdcall to be accepted. |
BrianH 19-Sep-2011 [3454x2] | I guess I just don't understand well enough what is done to support callbacks. If you specify a 'callback attribute, is there a shim created that marshalls arguments from the callback calling convention (cdecl or stdcall) to the internal calling convention of the function (stdcall or cdecl)? And if you specify 'cdecl or 'stdcall, does that affect the internal calling convention so that no shim is required? |
(Probably should just read the source) | |
Dockimbel 19-Sep-2011 [3456x3] | When you use 'callback attribute on a function, the compiler just tries to determine what is the appropriate calling convention to apply internally to the callback function. In order to acheive that, it checks the first caller function that will take the callback as argument and set the callback to the same calling convention. This part is done by the compiler's front-end, which just tries to set the calling convention correctly (just a word! in an internal block!), nothing else. The compiler's back-end just emits the right code for whatever calling convention the function has (cdecl, stdcall, syscall, ...). |
If you were asking if a runtime conversion was done between calling conventions, the answer is no. | |
Kaj: I think after this discussion that dropping the whole callback thing should be the simplest solution. I would only add a 'cdecl attribute for functions that needs to be called from C code. Any function (with or without 'cdecl attribute) could then be used as callback. Would you agree? | |
Kaj 19-Sep-2011 [3459x2] | Agreed |
You may want to add the stdcall attribute already, as well, for when you go to fastcall for native functions | |
Dockimbel 19-Sep-2011 [3461] | Right. |
BrianH 19-Sep-2011 [3462] | Sounds good to me too. |
Dockimbel 20-Sep-2011 [3463x4] | BrianH: I need to correct a bit my answer to your question. Actually, there is a small code emitter dependency on the 'callback attribute. It is used to save special registers (edi, esi, ebx) to conform to IA-32 ABI. It is only needed when providing callbacks that are invoked by the OS or external libraries. I should be able to keep this feature in the new revision while making it transparent to the users. |
BTW, I am glad you're following Red progress closer again. :-) | |
I have pushed a new revision of Red/System where the 'callback attribute is removed. Also, 'cdecl and 'stdcall are now accepted as functon attributes. I will update the specifications accordingly later today. | |
Kaj: as soon as your bindings will be updated for that, I will make the v0.2.2 release. | |
Kaj 20-Sep-2011 [3467x5] | Good, 0.2.1 doesn't work with any binding |
Hm, GitHub tarballs are down | |
cURL updated | |
0MQ updated | |
GTK updated | |
Dockimbel 20-Sep-2011 [3472] | You should be able to use the audio for SDL now. |
Kaj 20-Sep-2011 [3473x2] | Have you tested? |
Jay, it works! | |
Dockimbel 20-Sep-2011 [3475] | I just tested that it compiles correctly now. Cool! |
Kaj 20-Sep-2011 [3476] | SDL updated. Everything is ready now |
Dockimbel 20-Sep-2011 [3477x2] | Good, I'll make the new tag right now then. |
Ok, v0.2.2 tagged. | |
Kaj 20-Sep-2011 [3479] | I can create and close an SQLite database now |
Endo 20-Sep-2011 [3480] | that is cool! |
Kaj 20-Sep-2011 [3481x4] | Now I can execute SQL statements on a database, and process the results row by row with a callback |
Since SQL is a dialect, a lot can already be done that way | |
The binding is now here: | |
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-SQLite | |
Dockimbel 21-Sep-2011 [3485] | I have put the current contributions on a new page: http://www.red-lang.org/p/contributions_21.html |
Janko 21-Sep-2011 [3486x4] | I haven't found a way to see any source code on these fossil pages |
do I have to login for that? | |
that captcha password doesn't work for me because characters are not fixed width I assume | |
I copy/pasted it do text editor and was able to login. The code for GTK looks very nice | |
Dockimbel 21-Sep-2011 [3490] | Right, you need to login anonymously. Just click on "anonymous login", then "Fill out captcha", then "Login". |
Janko 21-Sep-2011 [3491] | (the captcha isn't readable in Chrome because fonts aren't fixed width) |
Dockimbel 21-Sep-2011 [3492] | I am using Chrome 14 on Win7 and have no issue reading the captcha. |
Kaj 21-Sep-2011 [3493x4] | Janko, there's a button that will fill out the CAPTCHA for you |
I've added a quick-start SQLite example | |
Added a WAV player example to the SDL binding | |
I believe I have now bound the audio part of SDL 1.2 completely | |
older newer | first last |