r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Red] Red language group

Endo
6-Dec-2011
[3969]
An alternative to ResHacker, XN Resource Editor, http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/d10resourceeditor.htm
Windows only I think.
Kaj
7-Dec-2011
[3970x2]
Implemented the ability to maximise or fullscreen a GTK window
I squeezed both maximising and resizing into the dialect, but the 
expressiveness is getting tight
Dockimbel
7-Dec-2011
[3972]
IIRC, you'll present Red on 09/12? (Syllable conf?)
Kaj
7-Dec-2011
[3973x2]
Dec 10, GeoFreedomDay
http://www.geofreedomday.nl
Dockimbel
7-Dec-2011
[3975]
Are your bindings ready for the show?
Kaj
7-Dec-2011
[3976x2]
I hope they will be ready for the show, but they don't exist yet 
:-)
Adrenalin is the best drug to make them on ;-)
Dockimbel
7-Dec-2011
[3978]
Oh, I see :-)
MagnussonC
7-Dec-2011
[3979]
Thnx for the answers.
Kaj
7-Dec-2011
[3980]
By the way, I added an extra error message when the icon file cannot 
be loaded
Kaj
9-Dec-2011
[3981x5]
I have a basic binding with OSM GPS Map working
A simple OpenStreetMap browser goes like this:
#include %OSM-GPS-Map.reds

gtk-view [
	gtk-maximize
	"OSM GPS Map Browser"
	osm-gps-map ogm-new-osd
]
I've got a basic binding with LibChamplain to work, too
The code for an OSM browser is very similar
Kaj
10-Dec-2011
[3986x3]
The presentation of the map bindings at GeoFreedomDay went well - 
that is, after I could coerce my Linux to display on the beamer
People immediately came up with the standard question of "Why yet 
another language?", but when I showed the GUI dialect and compared 
it to conventional development, they recognised that something special 
was offered
I'll make some screenshots tomorrow
GrahamC
10-Dec-2011
[3989]
Nice ..
Kaj
11-Dec-2011
[3990x4]
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/screenshots/OSM-GPS-Map-browser-on-RedSystem.png
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/screenshots/Champlain-map-browser-on-RedSystem.png
Response from Twitter: "Good job. This makes even butt-ugly Gtk look 
cool."
My thoughts exactly
Pekr
12-Dec-2011
[3994]
It seems that float support is bothering more than one RED supporter 
here, so we will see what's Doc's decision towards the priorities, 
once Doc is back ...
Kaj
12-Dec-2011
[3995x4]
I've got my WebKit browser to work on my graphical version of Syllable 
Server, so I'll start using it for real browsing tasks
I've moved the GLib binding in the GTK+ binding to a separate project, 
here:
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-GLib
This is now needed by every GTK binding
Steeve
13-Dec-2011
[3999x3]
For your information: A small code editor including lua scripting 
(GTK + scintilla bindings)
All sources included.
Low c footprint.
A good inspiration for further RED evolution.
http://caladbolg.net/luadoc/textadept/manual/1_Introduction.html
AKA an aspiring RED code editor
with RED scripting
BrianH
13-Dec-2011
[4002]
Looks interesting, Steeve. Be sure to post what you find out about 
Textadept in the Editors group.
Kaj
13-Dec-2011
[4003]
It's nicely integrated with Lua. Doc has a similar plan for Red, 
and I'm also looking in that direction
Kaj
14-Dec-2011
[4004x3]
I've published the map bindings here:
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-GTK-Champlain
http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-OSM-GPS-Map
GiuseppeC
15-Dec-2011
[4007]
Hi, I am interested into building an maintaining documentation for 
those programming languages based on REBOL.
It would be nice to have a DOCBASE for them.
What I search is:
- Someone ABLE to SETUP the Linux and the Wiki Software
- Someone which would share with me the cost of hosting.
Do you like the idea ?
Write me at [giuseppe-:-chillemi-:-eu]
Gregg
15-Dec-2011
[4008x2]
I want to help with that too, when time allows, but I think we need 
the authors of the languages to be part of the decision of how it's 
done. If they all want to do it different ways (and we want their 
input), that may be difficult.
Hosting should be very inexpensive, and I am willing to help with 
that.
GiuseppeC
15-Dec-2011
[4010]
Hope all of the authors see the advantage of having a common infrastructure 
for documentation.
Gregg
15-Dec-2011
[4011]
There is advantage, but also cost. I know I don't want to add any 
more tools, formats, and logins than necessary to my workflow.
Geomol
15-Dec-2011
[4012]
I think, it's a good initiative, but I can't judge, if it's a good 
idea, because I know too little about the different variants. How 
similar/different is Red, Topaz, Boron and World, and how are they 
compared to REBOL? Would the docs help a developer, or would they 
cause more confusion? It probably depends on the form of the docs 
too. Examples would help.


I plan to write a manual for World, something similar to "The C Programming 
Language" book. And that's not a dictionary, so there is good room 
for docs by others without overlap. And also docs, which are not 
just a dictionary, like extensive examples with explanations and 
probably other kinds.
Endo
16-Dec-2011
[4013]
See #Boron group please.
MikeL
20-Dec-2011
[4014]
I am trying to import zlib and had some minor success with an example 
for adler32 function.  Next was compress and now stuck on how to 
align the compress function ZEXTERN int ZEXPORT compress OF((Bytef 
*dest, uLongf *destLen, const Bytef *source, uLong sourceLen));  
 from http://www.zlib.net/manual.html#Utilityis ByteF * 
dest and Btyef * source pointers to bytes  defined was destination 
[pointer! [byte!]]     ?
Dockimbel
20-Dec-2011
[4015]
AFAICT, yes.
MikeL
20-Dec-2011
[4016]
Thanks Doc.   It is enlightening to see what can be done with Red 
import and DLLs.
Pekr
20-Dec-2011
[4017]
Doc, any news around? :-)
Dockimbel
20-Dec-2011
[4018]
36 failing math tests to fix before finishing the ARM port.