World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [435] | I'm thinking about descending it one level below to process the script at block! level instead of string! level, after all, the compiler has the full power of REBOL. |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [436] | Yes |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [437] | That should avoid the nasty side-effects. |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [438] | With the Linux backend, did the system loose its ability to cross-compile to Windows? |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [439x2] | Nope, I just need to adjust the compiler front-end (rsc.r) to pass an option for the desired format (PE, ELF, ...). |
Currently, a default format is applied depending on the REBOL binary used. | |
BrianH 15-Mar-2011 [441x2] | You can compose Red/System from REBOL in lieu of a preprocessor, until the compiler is ported to Red. |
I mean in lieu of preprocessor macros | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [443x2] | Do you mean replacing .reds scripts by .r scripts? |
Kaj: if you want to cross-compile, you currently need to hardcode the target format in %compiler.r at: fmt: select [ ;TBD: allow cross-compilation! 3 'PE ;-- Windows 4 'ELF ;-- Linux 5 'Mach-o ;-- Mac OS X ] system/version/4 | |
BrianH 15-Mar-2011 [445x2] | No, I mean that when you say that your long-term strategy is to compose Red/System code in Red, thus making preprocessor macros unnecessary in Red/System, you could start that strategy much earlier by composing the code in REBOL. What you learn from doing so and the code you write can be adapted to Red later once that exists. |
Doc, would you mind if I started some research on generating Dalvik binaries? I notice it's not on your list of planned platforms. | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [447x2] | Sure, no problem. |
I plan to support ARM directly. | |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [449x3] | Thanks, Doc, I just found it. I wanted to take the scenic route :-) |
It's amazing how much more approachable this system is compated to everything else out there - save for the very early teaching examples in computer science history | |
compared | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [452] | I wanted to get back to the roots (80's for me) of computing, a time where an entire OS + programming langage could fit in a 16KB ROM ;-). |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [453] | Brilliant |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [454] | That was the ZX Spectrum ROM to be specific. |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [455x2] | I'd allow for 20KB, though. Atari was 8K OS + 8K BASIC + 4K decimal floating point :-) |
Or was it 2K math? I'm really getting old. Anyway, it beats the pants off that Intel stuff | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [457] | I think that up to 64K, it's acceptable. :-) |
Henrik 15-Mar-2011 [458x2] | The Commodore Max beats that. |
http://scacom.bplaced.net/Collection/max/BASIC1.gif | |
BrianH 15-Mar-2011 [460] | Supporting ARM directly only gets you so far on Android. Native Activities were only introduced in 2.3, so the vast majority of Android devices don't support them. This means that unless you have some way to generate Dalvik code, applications witll still need some Java in them in order to run. |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [461] | Eh, you can do a lot in 510 bytes! |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [462x2] | Like a modern boot record... |
That reminds me of the Syllable demo I did where I installed the system in a Gentoo swap partition in order not to disturb the demo machine :-) | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [464] | Brian: I was planning to bridge with the Java API using JNI. Having a generic Java app to embed the Red native app (would be contained in a DLL in such case). |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [465] | Though I've long maintained that Syllable is bloated, under weird looks of my colleagues, so we'll do some collapsing with Red :-) |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [466x2] | Similar to what you were proposing for R3 on Android. |
Swap: nice trick! :) | |
Janko 15-Mar-2011 [468x2] | sorry for not being able to do something more creative, other than say - this all looks awesome so far! Red progress, red on linux, red + 0mq!! |
BrianH: red for dalvik, I think that is really a good idea! there is and will be a whole bunch of android devices out there, so this would be great. | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [470] | Janko: it's still an early phase of the project, but it's progressing well. |
Janko 15-Mar-2011 [471] | I know it's early, I am surprised by how fast and wide it's moving at so early stage. |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [472x2] | Like greased lightning :-) |
Although I'm running into a bit of a wall when I try to import functions under cdecl. I'm getting undefined symbols (path values into the emitter symbol table) all over the place | |
Dockimbel 15-Mar-2011 [474x3] | Kaj: you should wait that I add all the type & specs checking to the compiler and some unit tests (this week). It will make the compiler more usable. |
Kaj: I've fixed the cdecl bug (I guess it's the one you've hit), will push the sources in a few minutes. | |
Revision pushed. | |
Kaj 15-Mar-2011 [477x2] | Thanks. I don't even know if I need it, but you mentioned it for C libraries |
I don't mind the current limitations much if I know they will be fixed. I like to push the boundaries :-) | |
Dockimbel 16-Mar-2011 [479] | Cross-compilation is now supported from the command-line: do/args %rsc.r "[-vvvv] [-f PE|ELF] %path/source.reds" |
Kaj 16-Mar-2011 [480] | That's a really cool ability. It will turn some heads |
Kaj 17-Mar-2011 [481x4] | I published a new version of the 0MQ binding: |
http://rebol.esperconsultancy.nl/extensions/0MQ/ZeroMQ-binding.reds | |
This one is adapted for the latest Red. Since the basic runtime is now included by Red, it is removed from the binding | |
The send/receive functions have been changed from string to binary, so they can handle generic data | |
older newer | first last |