World: r3wp
[Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Kaj 17-Mar-2011 [485x4] | If you want to send data to Red from R3 or R2 using the Hello World example, you need to add a zero byte to the data, though, C style, because the example still expects string data |
The test executables should now run on Windows, instead of just WINE: | |
http://rebol.esperconsultancy.nl/extensions/0MQ/server.exe | |
http://rebol.esperconsultancy.nl/extensions/0MQ/client.exe | |
jocko 17-Mar-2011 [489] | works fine under windows xp ! |
Kaj 17-Mar-2011 [490] | Cool, thanks for reporting |
Gregg 18-Mar-2011 [491] | Works here under XP x64! Wow. Just...wow. |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [492x4] | X64. :-) It's 32 bits, but good to know there are no compatibility problems |
The current ELF backend format doesn't satisfy Syllable's loader yet (Syllable Desktop has its own in-kernel ELF loader) | |
When I compile the tests on Linux and try to run them on Syllable, I get this in the kernel log: | |
0:bash::bash : Error: load_image() Invalid section size 0, expected 40 0:bash::bash : ERROR : execve(./empty) failed. Too late to recover, will exit | |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [496] | Do you have a readelf command-line utiliy on Syllable? |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [497] | Yep, the standard GNU BinUtils one |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [498x2] | Can you paste me here the result of : readelf -l empty |
(just the program header entries) | |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [500] | I don't think it would be any different than on Linux, but I will |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [501] | Should be 2 lines starting with LOAD. |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [502] | OK |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [503] | Also, do you know if Syllable requires a "section headers" part in executable binaries? (it's optional in ELF specifications) |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [504x3] | [[kaj-:-syllable]:~/Red]readelf -l empty Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file) Entry point 0x8048074 There are 2 program headers, starting at offset 52 Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align LOAD 0x000000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x00184 0x00184 R E 0x1000 LOAD 0x000184 0x08048184 0x08048184 0x00032 0x00032 RW 0x1000 [[kaj-:-syllable]:~/Red] |
Indeed, exactly the same as on Linux, as it's the same executable, and the same readelf | |
I have to mention that Syllable does something odd by compiling all its own programs as shared libraries, so it could also be a problem in our loader that wasn't hit before | |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [507x2] | Seems good, sizes are specified, 0x32 (40) for the 2nd segment. Don't know what could cause the issue for the image loader, maybe the lack of section headers? |
oops, 0x32 = 50 | |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [509] | I don't know, I'll have to dive into our loader. It's much like Red: the minimum we needed over time to get things working :-) |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [510] | AFAIK, shared libraries on Linux have special requirements, like for the code, it must be compiled in PIC mode (Postion Independent Code). Red/System doesn't support that mode. |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [511] | Yes, I expect it not to work once loaded, but it doesn't even load yet |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [512] | A good opportunity to learn more about Linux kernel hacking. :-) |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [513x2] | Not really, this is the Syllable kernel :-) |
We determined that the shared library trick isn't even necessary, so we have a backburner plan to change it. So I hope it will be possible to get regular executables to run | |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [515] | Btw, PIC mode will have to be supported at some point of Red evolution in order to be able to build dynamic libraries for Linux (don't know for OS X). |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [516] | Yep, that will be another impressive addition |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [517] | DLL generation support could be added for Windows without too much effort (just by extending the PE.r code), but for Linux, it requires both work at the linker and at the compiler level for PIC support. |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [518x2] | Here's our loader: |
http://syllable.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/syllable/syllable/system/sys/kernel/kernel/elf.c?view=markup | |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [520x2] | Code looks somehow cleaner and easier to read than the linux loader. :-) |
Ok it seems it relies on section headers rather than program headers: if ( sElfHdr.e_nSecHdrSize != sizeof( Elf32_SectionHeader_s ) ) { printk( "Error: load_image() Invalid section size %d, expected %d\n", sElfHdr.e_nSecHdrSize, sizeof( Elf32_SectionHeader_s ) ); nError = -EINVAL; goto error; } | |
Andreas 18-Mar-2011 [522] | i think we can add a basic shdr table rather quickly |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [523x2] | nSecHdrSize is at 0 in Red's emitter. |
Andreas: yes, it's not a big deal...seems you're volunteering? :-) | |
Andreas 18-Mar-2011 [525] | i'll at least have a look or two :) |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [526x2] | That would be cool |
readelf gave me the impression that section and program headers are the same | |
Dockimbel 18-Mar-2011 [528] | Program headers describe segments. Segments are composed of one or several sections merged together. In our current ELF implementation, each segment contains only one section, so headers should be almost the same. That will change with the addition of dynamic linking support (which seem to require a lot of additional sections). |
Kaj 18-Mar-2011 [529x2] | That could be the reason that our loader always expects segment headers, because a Syllable program is also a dynamic library |
I think we ran into the multiple sections per segment problem halfway our development, when we needed to implement it | |
BrianH 19-Mar-2011 [531x2] | Wouldn't position-independent code be required even on Windows if you wanted to support address space layout randomization (ASLR) and other such tricks? |
It also helps when running Windows code on fake Windows-like OSes like SanOS that load at a different address. | |
Dockimbel 19-Mar-2011 [533x2] | ASLR: I suppose it's required, but I can't find any information from an official source explaining the exact requirement for ASLR on Windows (except the additional flag to set in the executable header). While searching for that, I found this interesting reading about PIC: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pic-internals.xml#doc_chap7 |
I would like, if possible, to support PIC without the additional cost of an indirection table for global data. | |
older newer | first last |