r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Red] Red language group

Andreas
29-Mar-2011
[878]
I'm unfortunately more aware of this than I would like to be :)
BrianH
29-Mar-2011
[879]
It's worse for me usually, since most of the libraries I need to 
interface with are written in languages other than C (C++, Delphi, 
.NET, Java), or have to match precise binary interoperability standards 
(COM, etc.). Simple C compatibility would not work for me at all, 
and this has also been the case with R2's library interface. Fortunately 
the database access has made my SDK license worth it :)
Dockimbel
30-Mar-2011
[880]
Thanks guys for the insights and propositions. I found it a bit difficult 
to follow in realtime, I'm not sure that AltME is the best tool for 
such conversations. Maybe we should give a try to the Red web forum 
next time: http://groups.google.com/group/red-lang?
Reichart
30-Mar-2011
[881]
Nenad , how would reading something in a forum be better than reading 
it here?
Andreas
30-Mar-2011
[882]
Different mode of communication. Less "real-time", more asynchronism.
Dockimbel
30-Mar-2011
[883x3]
Well, usually, you have more time to read and reply on a web forum 
before the post you're referring to, gets lost in the flow of new 
ones.
AltME is nice, but sometimes, when users are posting too fast on 
deep topics, I have a hard time following the conversation. My english 
is not that good, so I have to check for some words exact spelling 
or meaning when reading/posting. Also, I like to take time to think 
about things before saying them, especially when the topic is deep/complex. 
The old REBOL ML was great for that. That's why I was proposing moving 
such conversations to Google groups, which is just a web front-end 
to a ML.
With mailing-lists, you can have a threaded view of conversations 
in your email client, so you can easily follow replies to differents 
posts. I usually have no issues following replies on AltME except 
when several users are talking together and posting replies fast, 
it becomes hard to follow in realtime.
Robert
30-Mar-2011
[886]
I miss the ML as well...
Dockimbel
30-Mar-2011
[887]
I guess that in AltME, if we could have a way to "mark" the post 
we're replying to when required, and the ability to switch to a "threaded" 
view, that would help a lot. In such "threaded" view, related posts 
could be grouped together with a [+] button somewhere allowing to 
unfold it and see all the replies to a given post. If posting while 
a thread is unfolded, the post would be considered a reply without 
having to "mark" the post related to the reply.
Robert
30-Mar-2011
[888]
yep
Gregg
30-Mar-2011
[889]
+1 Doc.
Mchean
30-Mar-2011
[890]
move it to groups and make it visible to the outside world
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[891]
Ok, I've got new error - "Bus error"
Dockimbel
31-Mar-2011
[892]
Error message is shorter than the previous one, I guess it is a good 
sign. ;-)
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[893]
Yes, I agree :)
Dockimbel
31-Mar-2011
[894]
If you need some external eyes to look at your code or test it (I 
can test on OS X), you can "gist" it  (https://gist.github.com/) 
and put the link here. I, Andreas, or someone else could have a look 
at it.
Kaj
31-Mar-2011
[895]
I'd guess a bus error is an invalid address
Henrik
31-Mar-2011
[896]
rebolek, I thought bus errors were seg faults?
Kaj
31-Mar-2011
[897]
Yes, I think so
Henrik
31-Mar-2011
[898]
cause, I never get seg faults, always bus errors :-)
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[899x3]
I know how to get both :)
Doc, I will do some cleanup and put it there.
segfault is caused by kernel and bus error by memory
Kaj
31-Mar-2011
[902x2]
User space?
Or at the hardware level?
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[904]
hardware
Kaj
31-Mar-2011
[905]
Ah, that makes sense
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[906]
https://gist.github.com/896960
Oldes
31-Mar-2011
[907]
(using .r2 and .r3 extension would give proper code colorisation 
at github)
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[908]
Thanks Oldes!
BrianH
31-Mar-2011
[909]
.r2 please. The Red source is definitely not R3 compatible.
Dockimbel
31-Mar-2011
[910x3]
I can reproduce the "bus error" ;-)  I guess it is an alignment error, 
but hard to debug it without diving into Mach-O specs.
(I've used `otool -h hello` to have a look into the headers)
FYI: I'll be offline for the next 3 days, I'm taking some rest in 
Spain. I should be able to check my emails once a day.
Rebolek
31-Mar-2011
[913]
Yes, I think I have some offset wrong. I look into it deeply later.
Andreas
31-Mar-2011
[914]
bus error for me too :)
Endo
1-Apr-2011
[915x2]
compiler gives "Invalid path value: stdout" error after first error.
my script is:
print x ;gives *** undefined symbol, thats ok
then I change the script to
print "x" ;gives *** Invalid path value: stdout
or do I need to reload compiler each time?
PeterWood
1-Apr-2011
[917x2]
At the moment it seems that you need to reload the compiler after 
each error. I've reported the problem on gihub.
gihub -> github
Endo
1-Apr-2011
[919]
Thanks Peter!
BrianH
1-Apr-2011
[920]
Doc, could you make red-lang.org work, or at least redirect to www.red-lang.org, 
which does work?
PeterWood
1-Apr-2011
[921x2]
red-lang.org redirects to www.red-lang.org for me with both Safari 
and Firefox.
ah .... because the browsers are automatically re-directing.
Oldes
2-Apr-2011
[923x2]
Doc said "I found it a bit difficult to follow in realtime, I'm not 
sure that AltME is the best tool for such conversations"... I must 
say that I have a problem to follow conversation on blog if it's 
in french only. And I always found it strange that someone writes 
comment under article written in english in a different language... 
usualy in french.
One even cannot use google translator to translate the page, because 
google thinks, that it's already in english. It's not able to translate 
just a partial content (without manually copying it to some translate 
forms). It's simply a very bad habit.
GrahamC
2-Apr-2011
[925]
I think my BBS allows you to translate on a message by message basis
Endo
4-Apr-2011
[926]
+1 for Oldes.
Kaj
4-Apr-2011
[927]
Anonymous posting is supposed to be possible now on the Red Google 
group, but I can't