r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[World] For discussion of World language

Geomol
29-Dec-2011
[787]
Pekr, sorry I don't comment on all you say. But look e.g. at a product 
like WebOS, which was mentioned here in this AltME world not long 
ago. It was developed to the current state as close source. Just 
recently HP announced it to go open source. I judge it to be an ok 
success for the people behind it, even if it was developed as close 
source. Open source doesn't equal success. And close source also 
doesn't equal success. But they may be related.
Andreas
29-Dec-2011
[788]
Geomol: "man-years of work open-sourced for free? And this in a situation, 
where I get nothing from doing so?"


You could get _a lot_ from doing so. Increased participation in general, 
with all the positive effects that can encompass. But whether you 
consider that worth the trade-offs necessary to reap those benefits 
is obviously your choice.
GrahamC
29-Dec-2011
[789]
A lot of us would like Rebol and its derivatives to  be successful 
because success brings validation, and more importantly brings new 
people and development to Rebol.  We've all seen the closed source 
model fail, and specifically we have seen people leave Rebol or refuse 
to learn Rebol on this account.  Orca and Boron are not relevant 
because there was never a critical mass of people aware of it, and 
the GPL license put commercial developers here off.  Partial open 
source models like R3 would suggest that this model is also not attractive 
enough with a lack of investors to keep Carl working on the project. 
 Perhaps you do have some wonderful business plan that is going to 
work against all odds but the majority of us are not so optimistic. 
  We don't wish to see history keep repeating itself and so we are 
advising you to change your plan.   Think King Canute!
Kaj
29-Dec-2011
[790x2]
PLEASE STOP CALLING BORON GPL, OR EVEN CLOSED SOURCE!!!
- Shakes head at all the foolishness spouted here -
GrahamC
29-Dec-2011
[792]
If you add functionality to Boron, it becomes a derivative work and 
subject to GPL restrictions.  And stop shouting. lol
BrianH
29-Dec-2011
[793]
He means that Boron is LGPL, rather than GPL. You still get (an extended 
large subset of) the restrictions.
Kaj
30-Dec-2011
[794]
Yes, and the distinction warrants some shouting after half a decade 
of Boron and ORCA development
Mchean
30-Dec-2011
[795]
any idea what you're thinking of charging for it?
Geomol
31-Dec-2011
[796]
I haven't really thought of selling it, so I have no clue.
Geomol
2-Jan-2012
[797]
I have some free-lance work to do these days, but will continue work 
on World too.


The next thing for World is finishing the memory handling, so contexts 
are freed completely (problems with functions and blocks within contexts 
today). I'll check cyclic references too. After that, it's the rest 
of the datatypes, functions and better networking.
sqlab
2-Jan-2012
[798x2]
I just checked network.
You do not have an error handling for connect
Where and how do you handle a closed socket during receive (total 
== 0)
Geomol
3-Jan-2012
[800]
In src/host/network.c line 86 and src/host/win32/network.c line 84. 
I break out of the while loop, if recv returns zero in case of closed 
socket.
sqlab
3-Jan-2012
[801]
Yes, I saw that, but what do you do, if total is zero. What do you 
display or give back.
I just get an endless stream of "00000"  until crash
Geomol
3-Jan-2012
[802x2]
Under OS X, I get an empty binary, which is expected behaviour. Under 
WinXP, the process hangs here. The OS X and Linux version of World 
use standard BSD networking, the Windows version use MS networking, 
where an init is needed. You're welcome to suggest changes to the 
host specific sources. At this stage, I won't use a lot of time on 
Windows specific sources, as I don't use that platform very much.


I consider using cURL for networking, as that could give a lot of 
features fast. If I find, it adds too much to the overall size of 
World, it could be cut along the way by moving features from cURL 
to World sources.
In fact, it's libcurl, I consider, as cURL is a command line tool.
Mchean
5-Jan-2012
[804]
Geomol: is your freelance work using World-lang, just wondering if 
you find it good enough to do work in yet
Geomol
6-Jan-2012
[805]
No, mostly COBOL and some REBOL for now.
Geomol
12-Jan-2012
[806x2]
New release at: https://github.com/Geomol/World
- Added function to rebol.w: rebol (makes it easier to run REBOL 
scripts)
- Added option: --
- Fixed bug
Robert
27-Jan-2012
[808]
Any news here? Wondering why the momentum is mostly gone für world.
AdrianS
27-Jan-2012
[809]
maybe the licensing talk kind of lowered enthusiasm
GrahamC
27-Jan-2012
[810]
Maybe Geomol has found his own cave ?
Evgeniy Philippov
27-Jan-2012
[811]
:))
Rebolek
27-Jan-2012
[812]
Probably there comes free cave with every closed-source language.
Gregg
27-Jan-2012
[813]
The last release was only a couple weeks ago.
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[814]
Gregg - "only a couple weeks ago"? That pretty much sucks. Geomol 
HAS TO relalise, that noone is really intereted in old school models, 
or he is on his own ....
Gregg
27-Jan-2012
[815]
Is that sarcasm Petr?
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[816x2]
It is his free will to choose his license, as it is his free will 
to stay mostly unnoticed ...
Gregg - not a sarcasm, just my point of view ...
Gregg
27-Jan-2012
[818]
OK. How often do you expect new releases then, to keep people interested?
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[819x3]
What Geomol offers, is already being ruined by Carl and RT ...
Gregg - it is not about new releases, it is about caring about the 
product at all. So - Geomol announced World. After two months, my 
reality check is - NOONE is really interested, period.
And the culprit - the licence - the old song .... RT's path ...
Gregg
27-Jan-2012
[822x2]
I admit that I haven't made time to dig into World, but there is 
already a *lot* there from what I have seen. Personally, I am very 
interested. I am also very interested in leveraging community efforts 
in support of all the REBOL-like languages that are available.
As well as R2 and R3, including Saphirion's work.
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[824x3]
As for me - I do care about the Red - I already donate, and I will 
do so in next few weeks again. In opposition to you, I don't care 
in ANY closed efforts again. I don't care about RT anymore. Carl 
is an ufo :-) I can't accept  ANYONE, behaving like he is. Weren't 
we supposed to know the resolution of our situation? This is total 
crap - Saphirion my ass - Carl is just making joke of us all ...
As an IT manager, Carl would not survive one interview, period. His 
treat of REBOL related community, it totallly laughable. This it 
TOTAL failure, period. Anyone claiming - well -he has been away just 
for one year, is just an idiot ...
RT does not deserve any furter comment for me ...
Gregg
27-Jan-2012
[827]
Move to Vent to continue this.
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[828x2]
No, no need for me ... you are too think skinne. The reality check 
is rather harsh though ...
Most users will not express it publicly. But many will agree - Carl 
has totally failed, easy as that ...
Mchean
27-Jan-2012
[830]
He said he had some real money making work to do
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[831]
Mchean - WTF?
Mchean
27-Jan-2012
[832x3]
geomol
he had to do some work to pay the bills
I hope that he'll see the light about the licensing, he seems very 
reasonable
Pekr
27-Jan-2012
[835]
We were supposed to see an agreement between the Saphirion, and RT. 
And as expected - nothing happened. Perhaps, Carl is growing his 
wine :-)
Mchean
27-Jan-2012
[836]
or drinking it :)