• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

Kaj
5-Apr-2013
[1759x3]
There have been failure reports before, so something low level may 
be wrong with current Red on Android
Did you get any response?
What do you mean by the originally posted test? The http://sidl.fr/red/hello
download from Doc's blog is gone
james_nak
5-Apr-2013
[1762]
Yes, that one.
Kaj
6-Apr-2013
[1763x2]
It's gone, so you wouldn't be able to download it
Did you get any response?
Gregg
6-Apr-2013
[1765]
Go Kaj Go!
Kaj
6-Apr-2013
[1766]
Sleep first
Gregg
8-Apr-2013
[1767]
INCLUDE: So, the output %.r file, without option, will now be molded 
flat? If so, what is the reasoning?
Ladislav
8-Apr-2013
[1768x2]
Just a request. If you do not want the default, you can use INCLUDE/ONLY 
and save it as you see fit.
Do you think it is a complication for you?
Gregg
8-Apr-2013
[1770x4]
OK, good. Next question. Why not make the new behavior the option?


I only use the linked files directly on rare occasions. I'm just 
wondering what the benefit is. And, at first glance, INCLUDE/FLAT 
seems clearer.
I don't think it will complicate things much for me.
It won't be like CALL/SHOW breaking all kinds of stuff. :-)
So, what is the benefit of molding flat in this case?
Ladislav
8-Apr-2013
[1774x2]
The original demand was to have a /FLAT version which I offered to 
add, but Robert asked me to modify /LINK behaviour instead. I do 
not mind, in fact.
...but the fact is that adding another refinement would complicate 
the interface a bit without being absolutely necessary, perhaps
Gregg
8-Apr-2013
[1776]
I'm sure it will be fine. /ONLY has a different meaning everywhere 
else, and that meaning could be assumed here, so people just need 
to be aware.
Ladislav
8-Apr-2013
[1777]
I guess it was Carl who coined /ONLY for INCLUDE.
Gregg
8-Apr-2013
[1778]
Well, as I said, this is my first impression. :-)
GrahamC
8-Apr-2013
[1779]
@Kaj, that will be a test of rebolbot's error handling :)
Endo
10-Apr-2013
[1780]
AdrianS: Thank you for sharing RebolBot, it is a good example script 
of R3 as well.
AdrianS
10-Apr-2013
[1781]
Well, thank Graham - he did all the work. All I did was rip it apart! 
:-)
DocKimbel
10-Apr-2013
[1782]
Rebolbot: thank you for doing it Graham!


In the README, "About" section, is it normal that a Rebol link is 
pointing at Graham's SO profil while a Red link is pointing at Adrian's 
one?
GrahamC
10-Apr-2013
[1783]
Not sure why it's like that .. should fix it to point to the correct 
URIs
sqlab
10-Apr-2013
[1784x2]
my AltMe does not support collect in survey-reader
Ah, sorry, should install 2.7.8
Gregg
10-Apr-2013
[1786x3]
Adrian and Endo, thanks for posting!
Endo, just pasting in a func to test, but it always crashes.
Typed in a simple func and that also crashes. 

-= Red Compiler =- 
Compiling /C/Cheyenne/www/_ahb472d1f5g6c38e.red ...
*** Syntax Error: Invalid Red program
*** line: 1
*** at: "incr: func ['n] [set n add get n 1]"
james_nak
10-Apr-2013
[1789]
Graham and Adrian, incredible. I should look into right now but will 
probably wait my customary few years to rediscover your genius. Nice 
supportive words for Red Rebol in the Readme!
Kaj
10-Apr-2013
[1790]
Gregg, the error is what it says. It needs to start with a Red [] 
header, just like when you run the compiler locally
Gregg
10-Apr-2013
[1791]
Too used to tryrebol I guess. :-)
james_nak
10-Apr-2013
[1792x2]
Kaj/Endo, so Red is case sensitive? I tried red [] but it only likes 
Red []. Nevertheless, that's very cool.
Oh, I just read Doc's post.
DocKimbel
10-Apr-2013
[1794]
James: only the header is case-sensitive.
james_nak
10-Apr-2013
[1795x2]
Thanks Doc.
Kaj, so not all bad news then :-)
Kaj
10-Apr-2013
[1797]
Trying to light it up :-)
james_nak
10-Apr-2013
[1798]
I know, and just when things like this happen there are a bunch of 
people who decide they want to use the site(s)..
Kaj
10-Apr-2013
[1799]
I've postponed a Red article until this has blown over
PeterWood
13-Apr-2013
[1800]
Robert "saving potentials'" would normally be "potential savings"
Robert
13-Apr-2013
[1801]
Thx. Fixed.
Gregg
13-Apr-2013
[1802x3]
That's great news on Android Robert! Congratulations to the Saphirion 
team.
Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculate benchmarks and price forecasting.

Suggest:


A smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool that finds cost optimizations, 
calculates benchmarks, and forecasts prices.
If you want to stay closer to the current text: 


Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, 
calculating benchmarks, and  forecasting prices.
NickA
13-Apr-2013
[1805]
Awesome news Robert.  Demo crashed after a bit of play:

** Script Error: event: needs a value
** Where: loop -apply- wait do-events
if view demo 
** near:  loop 8
Robert
13-Apr-2013
[1806x2]
Gregg, thanks. Corrected.
Nick, thanks for the report. As said it's a very early release but 
we wanted to let you play with it.
Cyphre
13-Apr-2013
[1808]
Nick, yup, this is know problem. The event handling is a bit unstable 
as I had not enough time for additional debugging before making the 
release (It's a "tax" to have the release now rather than wait one 
more week or so :-)). Will be sorted out in the next release.