World: r4wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Kaj 5-Apr-2013 [1759x3] | There have been failure reports before, so something low level may be wrong with current Red on Android |
Did you get any response? | |
What do you mean by the originally posted test? The http://sidl.fr/red/hello download from Doc's blog is gone | |
james_nak 5-Apr-2013 [1762] | Yes, that one. |
Kaj 6-Apr-2013 [1763x2] | It's gone, so you wouldn't be able to download it |
Did you get any response? | |
Gregg 6-Apr-2013 [1765] | Go Kaj Go! |
Kaj 6-Apr-2013 [1766] | Sleep first |
Gregg 8-Apr-2013 [1767] | INCLUDE: So, the output %.r file, without option, will now be molded flat? If so, what is the reasoning? |
Ladislav 8-Apr-2013 [1768x2] | Just a request. If you do not want the default, you can use INCLUDE/ONLY and save it as you see fit. |
Do you think it is a complication for you? | |
Gregg 8-Apr-2013 [1770x4] | OK, good. Next question. Why not make the new behavior the option? I only use the linked files directly on rare occasions. I'm just wondering what the benefit is. And, at first glance, INCLUDE/FLAT seems clearer. |
I don't think it will complicate things much for me. | |
It won't be like CALL/SHOW breaking all kinds of stuff. :-) | |
So, what is the benefit of molding flat in this case? | |
Ladislav 8-Apr-2013 [1774x2] | The original demand was to have a /FLAT version which I offered to add, but Robert asked me to modify /LINK behaviour instead. I do not mind, in fact. |
...but the fact is that adding another refinement would complicate the interface a bit without being absolutely necessary, perhaps | |
Gregg 8-Apr-2013 [1776] | I'm sure it will be fine. /ONLY has a different meaning everywhere else, and that meaning could be assumed here, so people just need to be aware. |
Ladislav 8-Apr-2013 [1777] | I guess it was Carl who coined /ONLY for INCLUDE. |
Gregg 8-Apr-2013 [1778] | Well, as I said, this is my first impression. :-) |
GrahamC 8-Apr-2013 [1779] | @Kaj, that will be a test of rebolbot's error handling :) |
Endo 10-Apr-2013 [1780] | AdrianS: Thank you for sharing RebolBot, it is a good example script of R3 as well. |
AdrianS 10-Apr-2013 [1781] | Well, thank Graham - he did all the work. All I did was rip it apart! :-) |
DocKimbel 10-Apr-2013 [1782] | Rebolbot: thank you for doing it Graham! In the README, "About" section, is it normal that a Rebol link is pointing at Graham's SO profil while a Red link is pointing at Adrian's one? |
GrahamC 10-Apr-2013 [1783] | Not sure why it's like that .. should fix it to point to the correct URIs |
sqlab 10-Apr-2013 [1784x2] | my AltMe does not support collect in survey-reader |
Ah, sorry, should install 2.7.8 | |
Gregg 10-Apr-2013 [1786x3] | Adrian and Endo, thanks for posting! |
Endo, just pasting in a func to test, but it always crashes. | |
Typed in a simple func and that also crashes. -= Red Compiler =- Compiling /C/Cheyenne/www/_ahb472d1f5g6c38e.red ... *** Syntax Error: Invalid Red program *** line: 1 *** at: "incr: func ['n] [set n add get n 1]" | |
james_nak 10-Apr-2013 [1789] | Graham and Adrian, incredible. I should look into right now but will probably wait my customary few years to rediscover your genius. Nice supportive words for Red Rebol in the Readme! |
Kaj 10-Apr-2013 [1790] | Gregg, the error is what it says. It needs to start with a Red [] header, just like when you run the compiler locally |
Gregg 10-Apr-2013 [1791] | Too used to tryrebol I guess. :-) |
james_nak 10-Apr-2013 [1792x2] | Kaj/Endo, so Red is case sensitive? I tried red [] but it only likes Red []. Nevertheless, that's very cool. |
Oh, I just read Doc's post. | |
DocKimbel 10-Apr-2013 [1794] | James: only the header is case-sensitive. |
james_nak 10-Apr-2013 [1795x2] | Thanks Doc. |
Kaj, so not all bad news then :-) | |
Kaj 10-Apr-2013 [1797] | Trying to light it up :-) |
james_nak 10-Apr-2013 [1798] | I know, and just when things like this happen there are a bunch of people who decide they want to use the site(s).. |
Kaj 10-Apr-2013 [1799] | I've postponed a Red article until this has blown over |
PeterWood 13-Apr-2013 [1800] | Robert "saving potentials'" would normally be "potential savings" |
Robert 13-Apr-2013 [1801] | Thx. Fixed. |
Gregg 13-Apr-2013 [1802x3] | That's great news on Android Robert! Congratulations to the Saphirion team. |
Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, calculate benchmarks and price forecasting. Suggest: A smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool that finds cost optimizations, calculates benchmarks, and forecasts prices. | |
If you want to stay closer to the current text: Smart, intuitive, and powerful analysis tool for finding cost optimizations, calculating benchmarks, and forecasting prices. | |
NickA 13-Apr-2013 [1805] | Awesome news Robert. Demo crashed after a bit of play: ** Script Error: event: needs a value ** Where: loop -apply- wait do-events if view demo ** near: loop 8 |
Robert 13-Apr-2013 [1806x2] | Gregg, thanks. Corrected. |
Nick, thanks for the report. As said it's a very early release but we wanted to let you play with it. | |
Cyphre 13-Apr-2013 [1808] | Nick, yup, this is know problem. The event handling is a bit unstable as I had not enough time for additional debugging before making the release (It's a "tax" to have the release now rather than wait one more week or so :-)). Will be sorted out in the next release. |
older newer | first last |