World: r4wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Maxim 12-Jul-2012 [181] | RepRap is soooo cool. |
Jerry 13-Jul-2012 [182] | You can see some pages of my REBOL book here http://ww1.sinaimg.cn/large/6037fd14jw1duv0gjoatwj.jpg It's a colorful book :-) |
Arnold 13-Jul-2012 [183] | And a picture sometimes says more than a thousand words can. (Especially when your Chinese is a bit rusty like mine) :))) |
Kaj 13-Jul-2012 [184] | But Chinese is a thousand pictures ;-) |
Arnold 13-Jul-2012 [185] | I once ate in a Chinese restaurant in Thailand. The menu was only in Chinese. And Thai. Only the prices next to the pictures I recognized. |
Kaj 13-Jul-2012 [186] | So you read Indian. You're already half way there :-) |
Maxim 13-Jul-2012 [187] | nice work Jerry. |
Kaj 15-Jul-2012 [188] | Nick, do you know under what licence and when? |
Jerry 15-Jul-2012 [189] | REBOL open source? For Real this time? |
Robert 15-Jul-2012 [190] | I will believe it if I compiled it on my own system. |
Rebolek 15-Jul-2012 [191] | Very soon is how many years? |
Arnold 15-Jul-2012 [192] | The conditions True and Not False must be met first? It is an interesting thought nevertheless what conditions are meant. |
GrahamC 15-Jul-2012 [193x3] | NickD has a close relationship with the investors |
So finally good news :) | |
Should be this week | |
Henrik 15-Jul-2012 [196] | If so, I hope it will be possible to grind through the bug database, where development stopped. |
Maxim 15-Jul-2012 [197] | I hope it's released with a BSD/MIT style license. |
Kaj 15-Jul-2012 [198x2] | Doesn't sound like it |
Very soon sounds very familiar, though | |
Arnold 15-Jul-2012 [200] | Kids in the car: "Are we there yet?" "Soon! Very soon!" |
MaxV 16-Jul-2012 [201] | WOW, I'm so excited!!!! |
Arnold 16-Jul-2012 [202] | We are not mistaking this post from last year: http://rebolweek.blogspot.nl/2011/07/news-from-robert-muench-about-r3.html to be from this year?!? Then juli 23rd is soon. |
Henrik 16-Jul-2012 [203] | No, this was an old effort for Saphirion to get access to the source code privately. It didn't work. |
Rebolek 16-Jul-2012 [204] | R3 was never opened for RMA. |
PeterWood 16-Jul-2012 [205] | Those are great sales figures, Jerry. and very well deserved. |
Jerry 16-Jul-2012 [206] | Thanks, Peter. Maybe next REBOL dev-con will be held in Beijing, if I can sell more copies of my REBOL book. |
Henrik 16-Jul-2012 [207] | NickA, it comes from Carl himself. Saphirion has received as separate and similar notice a few days ago. |
Pekr 16-Jul-2012 [208] | What does it mean - open source, but with restrictions? |
NickA 16-Jul-2012 [209x3] | This is a really big deal for me. Hopefully for others. |
waiting and watching carefully ... | |
REBOL2 and/or R3? | |
Henrik 16-Jul-2012 [212] | It would only be R3. Spending time on opening R2 would probably cost Carl too much money on legal expenses. |
Endo 16-Jul-2012 [213] | Congratulations Jerry! REBOL? open source? wow! |
Henrik 16-Jul-2012 [214] | It's too early to get hopes up. The restrictions may be quite severe (NDA and such). |
Pekr 16-Jul-2012 [215] | I expect it to have a clause, that you can't use e.g. Core.dll with own hostkit, etc., or any other product ... |
Maxim 16-Jul-2012 [216x2] | we'll see, but at least if it allows R3 to progress, even if we need to purchase a separate license for locking down your own apps (like it was with the SDK, and may dual-licensed GPL tools out there) I don't think its a big issue. at least we don't have to wait. |
at least the platform can outlive a single person. it can also be extended and experimented on in unexpected ways. | |
Kaj 16-Jul-2012 [218] | It's highly unlikely to fit the definition of open source, so I would advise anyone not to use that term |
Arnold 16-Jul-2012 [219x2] | I agree with Kaj. Non disclosure agreements are not Open Source. |
Only makes me want Red more | |
Maxim 16-Jul-2012 [221] | you can't have an NDA when the source is public. this is not supposed to be a private release. |
GrahamC 16-Jul-2012 [222] | Yeah, public release .. .like Sun's Java :) |
BrianH 16-Jul-2012 [223x2] | So, we've gone past speculating about the "conditions precedent to the release" and started making up worst case scenarios? |
Understandable, I guess. I'm reserving judgement until I see a real license and some source. Cautiously optimistic :) | |
Kaj 16-Jul-2012 [225] | We're currently living in the worst case scenario |
Arnold 16-Jul-2012 [226] | I see no difference between Java and Rebol. Both free to use on every machine the company builds a VM capable of processing scripts/prgrams. |
MaxV 17-Jul-2012 [227x2] | For me, the important is to see the code, correct bugs and propose corrections and ideas. |
And most important of all, knowing all rebol commands and refinements. Rebol miss a lot a very good documentation! | |
Andreas 17-Jul-2012 [229] | MaxV: Regarding "all commands and refinements" have a look at the REBOL dictionary (for R2): http://www.rebol.com/docs/dictionary.html |
Gregg 17-Jul-2012 [230] | The Word Browser from the Viewtop, and HELP are good too. |
older newer | first last |