• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

GrahamC
10-Sep-2012
[438x3]
just bend over ...
Carl has removed a few more tags to stop spoofing ...
in yellow
Janko
11-Sep-2012
[441]
soo.. is this reply 10-Sep-2012 14:39:12 the real Carl or just more 
delicate fake Carl? The message still seem too simple about the future 
for the real Carl.
BrianH
11-Sep-2012
[442]
That's the real Carl - only the real Carl can remove comments, and 
comments were removed.
Pekr
11-Sep-2012
[443]
I think that the real hacker, has some surprise under the hood :-)
Chris
18-Sep-2012
[444x2]
Note that my Etsy API script does patch HTTP (for purposes of retrieving 
API error messages).  You can view those changes here: http://reb4.me/r/etsy-http-hack.r
And with thanks to Nick for instigating, supporting and helping test!
james_nak
19-Sep-2012
[446]
Thanks Chris and Nick. I'll be using that code!
Chris
20-Sep-2012
[447]
James, let me know if you encounter any problems. It's always a pain 
getting to grips with an OAuth app to start.
james_nak
20-Sep-2012
[448]
Thanks Chris I will. My wife has been itching to sell some stuff 
on etsy. Thanks for all you do Chris.
Marco
20-Sep-2012
[449]
No one here can test my new %opengl-glu-glut-h.r on X11?
james_nak
20-Sep-2012
[450]
Cool kaj.
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[451]
Thanks Kaj.
Arnold
20-Sep-2012
[452]
Hey, you are in the video too this time!
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[453x2]
Kaj: how do Fibonaci.ruby and Fibonaci.r compare in speed on your 
demo machine?
Ah, found a verbose: 1 left in natives.reds thanks to your presentation...and 
the code is missing a macro....funny way to debug/improve my own 
code. ;-)
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[455x2]
:-)
I published the complete benchmarks here early this year, I think. 
However, my Ruby results are considered unfair, because Syllable 
is using Ruby 1.8, while Ruby 1.9 is much faster. For the record, 
as far as I remember, REBOL is roughly twice as fast on such things 
as Ruby 1.8. Not sure if that applied to Fibonacci, but I remember 
it about Mandelbrot
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[457]
Android binary is twice the size of Linux one because ARMv5 architecture 
is bad at dealing with 32-bit literal values, so it takes much more 
space than for IA-32.
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[458]
Yeah, that's more or less what I explained
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[459x3]
Even with my experimental literal pools allocator, it decreases the 
final size by 10KB only.
I like the part: "Where will Red be deployed when ready?...Everywhere!" 
;-)
Thank you for your presentation Kaj! I've enjoyed it, but I guess 
I'm too involved to be objective. ;-)
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[462]
My pleasure
Andreas
20-Sep-2012
[463]
(I think the microbenchmark results were posted back in the REBOL3 
world.)
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[464]
Oh, right
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[465x2]
BTW, wrt to ARM big size binaries, it's also caused by ARM using 
32-bit words for every instruction, while IA-32 has still a lot of 
8 or 16-bit ones. For example, there's a lot of PUSH 0 instructions 
emitted for the datatype registration block (the unimplemented action 
pointers), that's 16bit on IA-32 and 32-bit on ARM.
However, ARM has also a lot of nice features and advantages over 
Intel CPUs.
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[467]
I was reading the instruction set in 1987 :-)
Andreas
20-Sep-2012
[468]
[[Just dug out Kaj's numbers for the Mandelbrot benchmark posted 
in the REBOL3 world in Feb 2012:

Red/System: 15
REBOL2: 440
Ruby(1.8): 480


(All relative slowdown compared to the fastest implementation in 
Kaj's tests.)]]
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[469]
You mean in the video? That's a faster machine
DocKimbel
20-Sep-2012
[470]
That was pre-faster-floats branch merge for Red/System, after that, 
Red/System score went down to 7 IIRC. ;-)
Andreas
20-Sep-2012
[471]
No, that's just the numbers you posted back in 2012-02. Slowdown 
compared to the performance of your C results back from 2012-02.
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[472]
Oh, that way
Andreas
20-Sep-2012
[473x2]
So back then, the Red/System binary took 15x the time of the C binary 
to run to completion. And yes, that was before the float optimisations 
:)
(Not run to completion, but finish the mandelbrot computation. AFAIR, 
you timed from within the programs themselves, not via an external 
tool.)
Kaj
20-Sep-2012
[475]
I did both
Marco
22-Sep-2012
[476]
Please, let me insist. Can someone test %opengl-glu-glut-h.r (on 
rebol.org) on a (real) X11 environment ?
Henrik
22-Sep-2012
[477]
If I had such an environment, I could test, but I don't, sorry.
AdrianS
22-Sep-2012
[478]
real, as in not in a VM?
Marco
22-Sep-2012
[479]
Yes I have it but not sure it is fast enough and with all the graphics 
drivers need, so it works but not as it should.
AdrianS
22-Sep-2012
[480]
Are you using VMware workstation 9.0? They've really improved 3D 
acceleration in this version
Marco
22-Sep-2012
[481]
No, using VMPlayer v.5.0
AdrianS
22-Sep-2012
[482]
well, all I can say is that Ubuntu 12.04 running as guest is very 
smooth, graphically speaking, with 9, and it wasn't like that before
Evgeniy Philippov
23-Sep-2012
[483]
I noticed that Ubuntu 12.04 has broken java which doesn't run Eclipse 
(neither Indigo nor Juno), so I switched to Debian
GrahamC
24-Sep-2012
[484]
1 frames in 21.601 seconds = 4.629415304847E-2 FPS
Place mouse cursor inside window to activate it
1 frames in 18.042 seconds = 5.54262276909434E-2 FPS
2864 frames in 5.001 seconds = 572.685462907418 FPS
2774 frames in 5.0 seconds = 554.8 FPS
3012 frames in 5.008 seconds = 601.437699680511 FPS
3138 frames in 5.001 seconds = 627.47450509898 FPS
Pekr
25-Sep-2012
[485]
GPL2 - what does that mean?
GrahamC
25-Sep-2012
[486]
Carl once said GPL was a communist manifesto.  My how times have 
changed.
Pekr
25-Sep-2012
[487]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and_open-source_software_licenses