World: r4wp
[#Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1890] | You fixed the cast arithmetic in master. Thanks, but I need it in dyn-lib-emitter |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1891x2] | Ah, you should have said that in the ticket, I copied the fix in v0.3.0 thinking that's where you needed it. :-) |
Done. | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1893x2] | I referred to it in our private chat on our secret project, but thanks :-) |
Actually, I don't need it, you need it :-) | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1895x2] | hehe :) |
Ok, I've added (not pushed yet) a new directive for including Red/System libs outside of 'red context. Example: #system-include [%tests/hello.reds] will load and compile the hello.reds script. Notice that relative include paths are resolved from Red/System root folder (%Red/red-system/). Does that cover your need Kaj? | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1897x2] | It should solve one big part of the problem. The other big part are the context sensitive #define's |
I also need #include's to work the same as in Red/System: relative to the source the path is in | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1899] | The only #include right now are Red/System includes. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1900] | Yes, those I mean |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1901] | #system-include just inserts them outside of 'red context. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1902] | Or do you mean paths in #system-include? |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1903x2] | The included file paths are left unchanged. |
They are just inserted at beginning of intermediary script passed to Red/System. | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1905x2] | I meant the ticket I have open |
The path of the source file they came from is lost | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1907] | Does such include work fine with %rsc.r? |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1908] | Yes, I use them everywhere |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1909] | (I mean just #include %../C-library.reds) |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1910x3] | By the way, I think we should eventually have a search path for includes, but that's for the future |
Yes, I use relative include paths of that form in all my bindings and examples | |
I need them to be able to install my Fossil repositories side by side in one main directory and then #include between them without changing paths | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1913x2] | I've pushed #system-include addition, but there's probably more path-related patches to apply I'm afraid. |
context-sensitive #define: seems to be a complicated change as it is the heart of the preprocessor...but context are created only during compilation (so after preprocessing). | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1915] | It would be easer if #system-include would be like #system so that you could wrap an extra context around Red/Sytsem code, without introducing an extra wrapper file. Would that be hard? |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1916] | No, trivial, I would then just remove #system-include and add an option to #system to have the code loaded outside of 'red context...but semantically, it will be a bit inconsistent with barebone #system, as it means "inline the Red/System code here"...Maybe I should just rename #system-include to solve that. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1917x3] | It works as it is now, but then I run into the #define problem |
This form of #system-include is probably still handy | |
Why does it require a block? | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1920] | I've changed it to #system-global, work exactly as #system but loads outside and before 'red context, should I push it? |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1921] | Please |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1922] | Done. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1923x3] | Works with #include with an absolute path |
There's an extra problem when I wrap the C binding in a context, but that seems unrelated | |
An #enum isn't prefixed with the context | |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1926x2] | For the defines, I think the best option (and cheapest) would be that I prefix the one I use internally for Red. |
It should IIRC. | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1928] | It's worse than that. The first error I get is on one of my #define's that's a struct! later in Red |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1929x2] | I guess you'll have to prefix (or suffix) them. |
Which one is conflicting? | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1931] | That would really butcher all my bindings. And it's too much work just to do temporarily for the demo |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1932] | I can maybe change some on Red side, if there are not too many conflicts. |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1933] | It's NONE, but I really wouldn't want you to change that in Red. And it's just the tip of the iceberg |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1934x2] | Added new actions: AT, SKIP, BACK, NEXT, LENGTH-OF. You can now do a bit more than just PRINT 1. ;-) See: a: 123 a: a + 2 print a * 6 - a b: [4 7 9 [11] test /ref 'red] print pick b 2 print pick pick b 4 1 print pick next b 1 print pick next next b 1 print pick back next b 1 print length-of b print length-of next next b print length-of pick b 4 print pick at b 2 1 print pick skip b 2 1 print pick at next b -1 1 print pick skip next b -1 1 |
I'll extend FORM tomorrow so we can print more types. | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1936] | #233 is back |
DocKimbel 17-Sep-2012 [1937x2] | Looking into it. |
Fixed it. Going to rest now, will process other tickets tomorrow morning. | |
Kaj 17-Sep-2012 [1939] | I'm busted, too. Night |
older newer | first last |