World: r4wp
[#Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2289x2] | I know, but I need new NTB after almost 6 years - at least core i5, 8GB RAM, SSD disk :-) |
yes, my font is Lucida Console. There is only one other option - raster ... I can't select any other font in that dialog ... | |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2291] | If you want you can manually install Consolas font as explained here: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/UsingConsolasAsTheWindowsConsoleFont.aspx |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2292] | OK, but the other reported things helped to find some bugs? All was it all just a font issue? |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2293] | No, there were bugs and that last one is a font issue. |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2294] | Downloaded Console2, which allows to have tabs, and allows me to change fonts, so I just choosed Consolas and the output is correct ... |
Andreas 26-Sep-2012 [2295x2] | Happy to report that Unicode on Linux with an all-UTF8 setup works just fine for me. |
I noticed that the red/tests/hello.red file is UTF-8 with a BOM -- I'd suggest dropping the BOM, as using a BOM with UTF8 is not recommended. | |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2297] | No problem to drop the BOM(b)! :-) |
Andreas 26-Sep-2012 [2298] | Now off to try what happens with a Latin1 environment, but I guess it won't work :) |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2299] | OK, so now I am back after the reboot, so my default Vista console uses nice Consolas font, and it now displays everything (apart from Chinese) correctly ... |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2300x2] | Red currently maps only to Unicode C printing functions. We could tweak the code to detect (for Unix platforms) the locale and fall back to Latin1 if required. |
Pekr: good! | |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2302] | So, what's next? :-) |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2303x3] | Andreas: do you think we should add Latin1 locale support too or just assume that now everybody use Unicode-capable terminals? |
Next: char! and all series actions already present in block! implemented for string! | |
Should be just a couple of hours of work, but I need first to fix one or two tickets for Kaj. | |
Arnold 26-Sep-2012 [2306] | Now Red can output texts it can produce strings with html code? And so theoretically is up to CGI processing maybe with a little help from REBOL. Or is that too early? |
GrahamC 26-Sep-2012 [2307] | Can red access stdin and stdout ? |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2308x4] | Not yet imo. There's imo no I/O apart from print .... |
but - Red apps is an executable, so theoretically, on systems like Linux, maybe it can be piped? | |
hmm, but it would have to support stdin/out for that probably anyway :-) | |
Kaj wrapped some libraries, maybe those cover some ground there, e.g. Curl binding allows you to work with networking: http://www.red-lang.org/p/contributions_20.html | |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2312x2] | There are functions capable of stdin/out in the C library binding. Some of them are included in Red/System itself |
Those can be inlined in Red, but Red itself currently only has print to stdout | |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2314x2] | We'll add stdin proper support when we'll implement console:// scheme. |
We could add CGI support earlier though. | |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2316x2] | Console scheme? We will have console? :-) |
Nice though, I always liked schemes like console://, clipboard://, those were just under-utilised imo :-) | |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2318] | Of course, as soon as it will be possible to make Red work in a console. |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2319] | Can we call it E: like on my Atari 8-bit? ;-) |
Arnold 26-Sep-2012 [2320] | That would give a little showcase to Red. Pls do not feel pushed Doc! One fool can ask more than ten wise men can answer ;-) |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2321] | What was the Amiga device name for that? CON:? |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2322] | yes |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2323] | If it was like DOS :-S |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2324] | I just got an idea - we will reimplement Amiga OS in a modern way :-) |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2325] | Been doing that for a decade |
Arnold 26-Sep-2012 [2326] | :D |
Pekr 26-Sep-2012 [2327] | Will we also have a system object structure? I liked lurking in the internals of REBOL in initial days :-) |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2328] | Already in Red/System |
GrahamC 26-Sep-2012 [2329] | Addimg CGI support early would be good ... for online demos |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2330] | You can do it in Red/System |
DocKimbel 26-Sep-2012 [2331x2] | Without proper internal sandboxing, you certainly wouldn't want to give open access to anyone for running Red (and even worse Red/System) code on your server. |
Once again, the best option for such live demos is adding a thin Red emulation layer on top of Topaz. | |
Kaj 26-Sep-2012 [2333x2] | On TryREBOL it's no problem. I've been giving the world a gaping hole into our server for three years now. It was a test, and people tried to break it, but they never got in |
CGI is based on the same principle. It's supposed to be a gateway from a Unix web server to a Unix file system, so you can secure it with operating system tools | |
GrahamC 26-Sep-2012 [2335] | I think you'd run it on your own server ... |
Gregg 26-Sep-2012 [2336] | Just skimming this group. Exciting to see so much going on here. |
Arnold 27-Sep-2012 [2337] | Adding CGI would be good for online demo's? Well for building web-sites too! Finally drop php. |
Oldes 27-Sep-2012 [2338] | Aren't you using Doc's Cheyenne server? ;-) |
older newer | first last |