• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[#Red] Red language group

Gregg
1-Apr-2013
[6821x2]
Interesting. How could that contaminate internals?
That is, I would expect a hard crash of some kind in that case.
DocKimbel
1-Apr-2013
[6823x2]
No idea for now, I'm looking into it...
Ok, got it, I've broken the internal word/load-in API....d'oh!
Gregg
1-Apr-2013
[6825]
Quick find. :-)
DocKimbel
1-Apr-2013
[6826]
Yep, but the fix is a bit longer.
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6827x4]
Playing with Francois's OpenCV binding.  I get an error on Linux 
ARM when compiling his OpenCV camera test.  The error is:


./opencv-cam-test: symbol lookup error: ./opencv-cam-test: undefined 
symbol: atexit


I've looked through all the code for the OpenCV cam test, the OpenCV 
binding itself, related libraries and Red/System source and I can't 
find "atexit" anywhere.  Am I overlooking it?  Any ideas what code 
this message is coming from?
Sorry, the above error is not when compiling, but when trying to 
execute the compiled code on Arch Linux ARM.
Nevermind.  Windows search is a piece of garbage.  Wrote a Rebol 
search and found it right away in C-library.reds.
Seriously...how hard is it to write a search that actually works? 
 Microsoft has how many billions of dollars?
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6831]
Francois includes an old version of my C library binding. Newer versions 
use a different API on ARM to define on-quit
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6832]
Yes, I had a copy of your newer C library binding.  I compared the 
relevant sections and added in the appropriate parts.  Now I have 
a different problem, possibly due to me not running a gui on my Raspberry 
Pi.  Don't know yet if OpenCV requires a GUI to operate or not.
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6833]
It would be better to update it wholesale. Using older versions will 
keep leading to already fixed problems like this. Updating parts 
can lead to inconsistency problems
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6834x2]
undefined symbol: cvCreateCameraCapture


which is a component of highgui.reds, which I #include in my program.
Thanks for the advice.  I'll have to add in Francois's additions 
into yours.
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6836]
Did he change the C library binding?
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6837]
Yes, he added a couple of items:

        ;added by F. Jouen
        ; is not a number? 
        isNaN: "isNaN" [
                value           [float!]
                return:		[logic!]   
        ]
        ;isinf - test for infinity
        isInf: "isInf" [
                value           [float!]
                return:		[integer!]
        ]
        ;// F. Jouen
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6838]
Hm, that's annoying. Working like this will quickly explode into 
extra work
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6839]
Do you propose using github or something to host the Red/System bindings?
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6840]
It's already hosted in Fossil
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6841]
Is there a how-to for Fossil?  I checked http://red.esperconsultancy.nl/Red-C-library/wiki
but don't see a how-to there.
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6842]
http://fossil-scm.org
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6843]
Thanks.  I'll read it.
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6844]
Those two functions are BSD extensions. They can't be relied upon 
to be in all C libraries
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6845]
So there should be an OS check there, right?
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6846]
You'd first have to know which platforms support them
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6847]
OK.  So I successfully checked out your C-Library using Fossil.  
Thanks for the pointers!
AdrianS
3-Apr-2013
[6848]
Bo, wrt crappy built-in searching, I highly recommend the Everything 
search utility from voidtools. Best file search for Windows. Lightweight 
(no need for service), small, and quick. I've been using this for 
quite a while and I thought that development had unfortunately stalled, 
but, since the new year, it looks like it's being actively worked 
on again. I'm so happy! Yes, it is that nice!

http://www.voidtools.com
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6849x2]
Kaj, I did a Google search on isNaN and cannot find a list of C libraries 
that don't support it (or that do).  Do you have any ideas on how 
to do this check?
AdrianS: Unfortunately, it won't work for me:

From their FAQ:
1.3 Does Everything search file contents?

No, "Everything" does not search file contents, only file and folder 
names.


I find that I search within file contents at least as much as for 
filenames.  It shouldn't be too hard to write a Rebol-based standalone 
exe that would do this.  I'll add it to my growing list of scripts 
to write.
AdrianS
3-Apr-2013
[6851]
I thought this might be an issue. For that, you should use my second, 
favourite search tool - grepWin, from Stefan's Tools.

http://tools.tortoisesvn.net/grepWin.html

Btw, we should take this to another group.
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6852x4]
Bo, I'm looking here in the documentation of the GNU C library, where 
it says they are BSD extensions:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Floating-Point-Classes.html
I'm working on integrating them into the binding
C99 defines corresponding macros, so that's the standard, but C macros 
can't be used in Red/System
Bo
3-Apr-2013
[6856]
Kaj, thanks!
Kaj
3-Apr-2013
[6857]
Looked through your files, Gregg. You've been busy :-)
Gregg
3-Apr-2013
[6858]
Yes I have. It's great fun. Starting from the basics, seeing what 
you need to build everything else, and re-thinking how to do things 
because things like PARSE aren't there yet.
Ladislav
3-Apr-2013
[6859]
Does Red already have a URL! datatype?
Gregg
3-Apr-2013
[6860]
No. Now is your chance to make sure it's done right. :-)
Ladislav
3-Apr-2013
[6861x2]
Hmm, Rebol is, essentially, in the same situation (url! is incorrect)
(maybe more correct in R2 than in R3)
Gregg
3-Apr-2013
[6863]
Interesting, and not good.
NickA
4-Apr-2013
[6864]
I believe Red can find a market:  http://www.drdobbs.com/jvm/the-quiet-revolution-in-programming/240152206?cid=DDJ_nl_upd_2013-04-03_h&elq=6510ad5ddf4b42adb5b3cd05ed730e24
DocKimbel
4-Apr-2013
[6865]
Yes, there's an opportunity for a language like Red with very broad 
possible usage.
AdrianS
4-Apr-2013
[6866]
The DrDobbs link led to this one - After XML, JSON: Then What?


http://www.drdobbs.com/web-development/after-xml-json-then-what/240151851


That article mentions that one of the "most interesting" new data 
formats being considered is TOML (this looks like the .ini file format)

https://github.com/mojombo/toml

Is this really what we can expect?
DocKimbel
4-Apr-2013
[6867x4]
Funny, on each iteration, they are getting closer and closer to REBOL 
data format...:-)
# First class dates? Why not?
# You can indent as you please. Tabs or spaces. TOML don't care.

:-))
INSERT action implemented for all series datatype. Unit tests are 
welcome.
Especially on strings with different internal encodings (Latin1, 
UCS-2, UCS-4), all combination should be tested for both INSERT and 
APPEND.