World: r4wp
[#Red] Red language group
older newer | first last |
Pekr 5-Apr-2013 [6902] | Swimming in the sea? It's still winter here :-) |
Kaj 5-Apr-2013 [6903] | Doc likes to get sick for months on end |
DocKimbel 5-Apr-2013 [6904x2] | Will be 22°C tomorrow, a shiny day, water should be still a bit cold though. :-P |
Yeah, I just recover a few weeks ago from winter flu, time to play with another virus. ;-) | |
Pekr 5-Apr-2013 [6906] | beware of Ren - new form is appearing .... |
DocKimbel 5-Apr-2013 [6907] | Hope that one will spread everywhere. ;-) |
Kaj 5-Apr-2013 [6908] | Do you think multiple compiler processes can run at the same time, or would they clobber shared files? |
Gregg 6-Apr-2013 [6909] | If I do this in the console: foreach word system/words [print [mold word tab mold type? get word]] I get a long list of words, that end with this: ... do-console function! red-prompt unset! mode unset! switch-mode unset! eval unset! code unset! result unset! cnt unset! mono unset! block unset! q function! red>> Now, if I paste a bunch of code in the console and do it again, the newly added words all come back as type datatype!. e.g. ... block unset! q function! Title datatype! Author datatype! File datatype! Tabs datatype! any-function? datatype! ... |
DocKimbel 7-Apr-2013 [6910x2] | Multiple compiler processes at the same time: I see no issue doing that as Red is doing it all in memory. |
Gregg: looks like a bug related to the one fixed recently about system/words returning datatype! only. | |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6912] | Doc, no log files? |
DocKimbel 7-Apr-2013 [6913] | Nope, logs are optional and when requested, there are emitted on stdout. |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6914x2] | OK, thanks |
I'm moving to a new dual-core machine. When compiling Red, it uses only one core, so I'm considering using 0MQ to make use of the extra core | |
DocKimbel 7-Apr-2013 [6916] | When we'll have modular compilation, we'll be able to leverage multicore processors. |
Arnold 7-Apr-2013 [6917] | A new dual core machine? Do they still manufactor those? I kind of had the idea the OS decides when to use more than one processor. |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6918x3] | It's only seven years old. :-) My previous machine is eleven years old |
If your program is only one process and no threads, it's impossible for an OS to run it on more than one core at the same time | |
So on your eight-core machines, only one is really used :-) | |
Arnold 7-Apr-2013 [6921] | sometimes I wonder about that even. Must be calculating that spinning wheel then. |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6922x2] | Yep, it could dedicate a whole core to that :-) |
I think OS X GUI apps are fundamentally dual-threaded, with one thread for the GUI, so in the best case, it uses two cores more or less | |
Arnold 7-Apr-2013 [6924] | But seriously why not a machine that is more actual? Because you prove the minimalistic needs? |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6925x3] | Yes; for example, in Syllable Desktop, almost no speedup is noticable in regular use |
That is to say, the old machine was already more than usually needed for Syllable | |
Our fifteen years old laptops are still among the best machines we have to run Syllable on | |
Arnold 7-Apr-2013 [6928] | Better run an ad in the local paper: "We collect your old PC's for free" |
Kaj 7-Apr-2013 [6929x4] | Nah, that costs money. We can get computers without ads :-) |
Try this in Try REBOL: | |
call "cat /proc/cpuinfo" | |
That server was also donated | |
Oldes 9-Apr-2013 [6933] | It is not possible to create struct with function datatype as a member? |
Kaj 9-Apr-2013 [6934] | In most cases, you have to cast to integer! to handle function pointers |
Oldes 9-Apr-2013 [6935] | fine.. this got compiled: wc/lpfnWndProc: as integer! :WndProc |
Gregg 10-Apr-2013 [6936x2] | Haven't checked to see if it's a known issue, but if I append/dup with a large number of elements it crashes. I'll try to track down the exact number. 75K does it, 65K does not (in a quick int append test). |
Ah, I tricked myself. It is OK at 65536, but crashes at 65537. I thought it wasn't right at the 64K boundary. | |
DocKimbel 10-Apr-2013 [6938] | It's too early to stress test the memory manager, as it's not yet completed for the handling of bigger series. |
Pekr 10-Apr-2013 [6939] | Maybe it causes stress to Gregg, that he can't stress-test :-) |
Endo 10-Apr-2013 [6940x4] | Here you can compile your Red scripts online and then download the compile executable file: http://bircomteknoloji.com:8181/ |
You can use it to test for compiling Red scripts and generated executable file. | |
Doc: Red header is case sensitive, red [ ] doesn't compile, "Invalid Red program" it says. Red [ ] works. | |
Some antivirus programs gives false alarm for compiled executables, so I think its better to not spread this site too much, people can think that it downloads viruses. | |
Gregg 10-Apr-2013 [6944] | Ah, that would explain my errors Endo. I didn't include a header. |
DocKimbel 10-Apr-2013 [6945x5] | Endo, nice work! Could come handy sometimes. |
For false alarms from AV software, please report them to me so I can contact AV vendors to whitelist Red binaries. | |
For Red header, I've made it case sensitive on purpose as, unlike Rebol which is a very uncommon name, Red is very common, the risk of a false header detection is much higher (for scripts embedded in HTML, makedoc document, etc...). So the case-sensitivity would lower the number of false positives. An added benefit is that it forces users to write Red name correctly, so not RED or red. | |
Endo, you could even make it a webservice that could be used with a simple WGET call from a command-line. ;-) | |
Also, when asking for the file to be downloaded, you should rename the file to something more human-friendly or ask the name from the user. You can use Content-Disposition HTTP field for doing that easily. Here's an example from one of CureCode's RSP: response/buffer: get-modes file 'full-path response/set-header 'Content-Disposition rejoin [{filename="} name {"}] | |
Gregg 10-Apr-2013 [6950x2] | On the header, having it be Red may lead to the most false positives. If it's at the top of a file, it would normally be capitalized. |
As long as it must be followed by a left bracket, you should be OK though. | |
older newer | first last |