World: r4wp
[Rebol School] REBOL School
older newer | first last |
Ladislav 10-May-2013 [1973] | The same note applies to RULER-2 |
Bo 11-May-2013 [1974] | When Carl had me write my first Rebol script, his goal was to see if I understood how scripting in Rebol is different than most other languages. One of the helpful things he told me was that if you see patterns in your scripts, then you are likely not scripting as efficiently as possible. |
Henrik 11-May-2013 [1975] | Bo, that's a great quote. |
Reichart 12-May-2013 [1976] | LOL, I was just posting a rant on FB that can be summed up as "if you do it over and over again, make a BLOODY shortcut". |
PatrickP61 14-May-2013 [1977] | Ladislav, Excellent notes!!! For whatever reason, (old coding habits I guess) I started with defining the object RULER-1 and then manipulating it. I now see what you are saying about using the INSERT/DUP. As to notes about HEAD, I realize now that I confused INSERT and APPEND, (thinking it inserts at tail, when it doesn't. I welcome any and all comments to help me get out of my paradigm!! |
Ladislav 14-May-2013 [1978x5] | As to notes about HEAD, I realize now that I confused INSERT and APPEND - APPEND used in a similar way as above would not need HEAD either |
Neither INSERT nor APPEND modify the index attribute of their argument (the index attribute of series is immutable, in fact) | |
Having a series with index 1 (the head has this index), neither INSERT nor APPEND can change the index of the series. What they do is something else - they return a series with a different index. | |
To illustrate this further, let's consider a trivial example: a: 1 b: 2 add a b ; == 2 You can examine A and B now and see that the ADD function did not change A or B, but it returned 2 (another value). Similarly, INSERT does modify the argument series, but not its index, however it returns a series with a different index. | |
Is this clear? | |
Endo 14-May-2013 [1983] | Your example should be "== 3" I guess? |
DideC 15-May-2013 [1984x2] | :-) |
(best of us can be wrong sometimes. Just to LOL, no pun intended) | |
Pekr 15-May-2013 [1986x2] | >> add: :multiply >> a: 1 == 1 >> b: 2 == 2 >> add a b == 2 |
You can always find a solution :-) | |
Endo 15-May-2013 [1988] | /LAST refinement doesn't return the last match when used with /REVERSE refinement. Is that a known issue? >> FIND/reverse/last tail "aoboco" "o" == "o" >> FIND/reverse tail "aoboco" "o" == "o" >> FIND "aoboco" "o" == "oboco" >> FIND/last "aoboco" "o" == "o" |
MaxV 15-May-2013 [1989] | Hello, someone needs Sublime Text 2 editor syntax highlight file, see http://rebol.informe.com/forum/rebol-2-f8/sublime-text-2-t59.html Do you know where he may find it? |
DideC 15-May-2013 [1990] | find/reverse and find/last are somewhat identical but not from the same point of start. So you have to use one XOR the other. |
Gregg 15-May-2013 [1991] | Endo, what result do you expect for FIND/reverse/last tail "aoboco" "o" ? |
Ladislav 15-May-2013 [1992] | Your example should be == 3" I guess?" - actually, I had a: 1 and b: 1 originally, and I somehow "managed" to change B to 2 :-( |
Endo 15-May-2013 [1993] | Gregg: When use /REVERSE refinement it searches backwards from the current position. So I expect to find the /last "o" (in the negative direction) which is "oboco". aOboco the captial O is the LAST one in backward direction. I understand that the last "o" is still the right most one. But I expected the other one at first glance. |
Gregg 15-May-2013 [1994] | Understood. That would make it redundant with /REVERSE, rather than overriding it. |
DideC 17-May-2013 [1995x2] | To my understanding "find/last serie value" is the same thing than "find/reverse tail serie value". |
But it found the first value backward from the position, so "o" is correct result. | |
Endo 23-May-2013 [1997x2] | Which script do you suggest me to use for parsing XML files for R'? There are many on rebol.org. I mainly want XML to object, so I can export data from .xlsx file. XML to blocks might work but I may need to work on objects for more functionality. |
* for R2 | |
Geomol 23-May-2013 [1999x2] | If I remember correctly, you can't go 1 to 1 from xml to object. You can to block. I've only used my xml2rebxml.r, which produces a block. You could work from there, pull out the elements, you need, and produce an object. http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=xml2rebxml.r |
The RebXML format is described here: http://www.fys.ku.dk/~niclasen/rebxml/rebxml-spec.html | |
Endo 23-May-2013 [2001] | Thank you Geomol. I saw AltXML from Christopher Ross-Gill, I'll try both. Thanks. |
Endo 27-May-2013 [2002x2] | Chris: is that normal? >> load-xml {<si><t xml:space="preserve">test</t></si>} == [ <si> [ <t> [ #space "preserve" %.txt "test" ] ] ] |
Why it puts %.txt ? | |
GrahamC 27-May-2013 [2004] | Chris is in Peru at present .. don't expect any answers soon. Unless you talk to him on SO chat |
Maxim 27-May-2013 [2005] | for sure, you want stuff to be tag pair aligned so you can easily loop through it... though I don't know why he uses the file type to mark tag content. probably just to differentiate it from attribute and tags |
AdrianS 27-May-2013 [2006] | Endo, that's just his notation for a text node - not meant to imply it's a file. |
Endo 28-May-2013 [2007x2] | I see, I just confused if it's a bug or not. >> load-xml {<a>test</a>} ; == [ <a> "test" ] >> load-xml {<a b="c">test</a>} ; == [ <a> [ #b "c" %.txt "test" ] ] |
Why this doesn't work? >> parse [1] [1] ;== false while this one works >> parse [a] ['a] ; == true | |
Cyphre 28-May-2013 [2009] | parse uses literal numbers for rules definition you need to use: parse [1][integer! (process-integer-here)] |
Endo 28-May-2013 [2010] | So, no chance to specify an exact number in a parse rule? |
Geomol 28-May-2013 [2011] | >> parse [1] [1 1 1] == true >> parse [1 1] [2 2 1] == true |
Maxim 28-May-2013 [2012] | darn... never new we could do that!!!! logical enough... wonder why I never tried it. |
Andreas 28-May-2013 [2013] | In R3, youi can also use the QUOTE command: >> parse [1] [quote 1] == true |
Gregg 28-May-2013 [2014x3] | parse-int-values: func [ "Parses and returns integer values, each <n> chars long in a string." input [any-string!] spec [block!] "Dialected block of commands: <n>, skip <n>, done, char, or string" /local gen'd-rules ; generated rules result ; what we return to the caller emit emit-data-rule emit-skip-rule emit-literal-rule emit-data digit= n= literal= int-rule= skip-rule= literal-rule= done= build-rule= data-rule skip-rule ][ ; This is where we put the rules we build; our gernated parse rules. gen'd-rules: copy [] ; This is where we put the integer results result: copy [] ; helper functions emit: func [rule n] [append gen'd-rules replace copy rule 'n n] emit-data-rule: func [n] [emit data-rule n] emit-skip-rule: func [n] [emit skip-rule n] emit-literal-rule: func [value] [append gen'd-rules value] emit-data: does [append result to integer! =chars] ; Rule templates; used to generate rules ;data-rule: [copy =chars n digit= (append result to integer! =chars)] data-rule: [copy =chars n digit= (emit-data)] skip-rule: [n skip] ; helper parse rules digit=: charset [#"0" - #"9"] n=: [set n integer!] literal=: [set lit-val [char! | any-string!]] ; Rule generation helper parse rules int-rule=: [n= (emit-data-rule n)] skip-rule=: ['skip n= (emit-skip-rule n)] literal-rule=: [literal= (emit-literal-rule lit-val)] done=: ['done (append gen'd-rules [to end])] ; This generates the parse rules used against the input build-rule=: [some [skip-rule= | int-rule= | literal-rule=] opt done=] ; We parse the spec they give us, and use that to generate the ; parse rules used against the actual input. If the spec parse ; fails, we return none (maybe we should throw an error though); ; if the data parse fails, we return false; otherwise they get ; back a block of integers. Have to decide what to do if they ; give us negative numbers as well. either parse spec build-rule= [ either parse input gen'd-rules [result] [false] ] [none] ] |
>> parse-int-values "123456" [1 2 3] == [1 23 456] | |
Just as an example of how you can work around it with a bit of indirection. | |
Sujoy 7-Jun-2013 [2017] | this is on r3 am trying to do a simple read http://google.com and get Access error: protocol error: "Redirect to other host - requires custom handling." how do i custom handle? |
Endo 7-Jun-2013 [2018] | I think you should use cURL binding for R3. |
GrahamC 7-Jun-2013 [2019x3] | @Sujoy .. there some relatively easy fixes to the R3 http protocol to handle this. But .. due to various issues .. they just have not found their way into the binaries :( |
Basically the http protocol sees a redirect eg. from http:// google to https google and complains. | |
or from google.com to www.google.com etc. | |
Sujoy 7-Jun-2013 [2022] | thanks graham. endo - looking at cURL...thanks for the pointer |
older newer | first last |