• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[!REBOL3] General discussion about REBOL 3

NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1228x2]
Yes, and a REBOL back end would make the next "tougher" layer easier 
to dig into.
REBOL can be as high level as needed - more so than *any other language.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1230]
There would be room for an "Algebra dialect"
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1231]
The livecode guys are working towards understanding the "natural 
language" idea, but they're a long way from achieving what Carl already 
accomplished with REBOL.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1232]
Like Hypercard, the App becomes a "window" into the language.  AltME 
has this potential, Presenter.r had this potential, Layout.r has 
this potential.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1233]
VID and other similar dialects had the greatest potential.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1234x2]
The kicker would be quality formative assessment tools that would 
give teachers and students feedback on how they are doing.
But the Apps the make the language accessible were never made.  I 
have had long discussions about this before at RT.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1236]
Scot and Nick, Rebol has been my secret weapon. Despite trying to 
get others to look at it.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1237]
I think that could be the case for many more people.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1238]
And I with you Scot on wanting an IOS version for precisely for the 
ed market.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1239x3]
I don't think much has to change.  REBOL just needs to be updated, 
the look modernized, and ALL the modern platforms supported.
It's original purpose and benefits are still totally values.
values -> valid
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1242]
I had funding for an ISP business model for RT, not a direction they 
wanted to go.  I also successfuly pitched the Internet Operating 
System Idea to a major ISP, again RT wanted to go in a different 
direction.  I have discussed the Classroom idea before but never 
been able to pitch it.
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1243]
Man, I envy the education market. I wish I could work in it :-/
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1244]
BrianH, you would and should be a god there!
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1245]
RT made terrible marketing and business decisions.  There is absolutely 
no reason why REBOL shouldn't be a big success.  RT just didn't make 
it happen.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1246]
I could be in a position quite soon to revive discussions about Classroom. 
 Local WiFi distributed network.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1247]
Now that it's open source, anyone can pick it up.  Personally, I 
think Doc has all the right ideas with Red.
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1248]
They're only terrible in retrospect. Nobody knew back then that its 
entire business model would die. We know now, but thet didn't know 
back then.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1249x2]
I knew.
And vocalized them clearly.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1251]
RT Partly didn't, but also partly couldn't.  There were customers 
to support making it hard to take on big players, even if with a 
possibily high ROI.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1252]
I hope Doc has the technical chops to pull it off, because his head 
is in the right place, and the right perspective about the market.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1253]
Well, that's where Rebol was getting all their money so I suppose 
it seemed like a great idea at the time.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1254x2]
I won't say more about the opportunites that were there because it 
isn't my story to tell.
The people chosen at the critical stage to run the company were not 
a good fit, unfortunately.
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1256]
A lot of people said a lot of stuff on both sides. And I meant die 
on a societal level, not just for RT. And I meant back before 2000. 
A lot of people thought they knew stuff back then, but most of that 
knowledge was really belief. For one thing, back then people in the 
free software camp thought free software would succeed because of 
principles - very few knew that those principles would be irrelevant 
and that practical considerations would make it succeed for other 
reasons.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1257]
Happens all the time. We are very fortunate that Carl continued the 
work as long as he did.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1258]
Yup
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1259]
That's true Scot :)
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1260x2]
Agreed.  So I still have quite a few ideas, though my funding sources 
have long since disappeared.
I suppose I might be able to drum up some more, but not unless they 
can own it.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1262]
Scot, you need to write that killer app!
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1263]
I am working on making a business model.  If I can get it started, 
I can help get funding.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1264]
I don't know people who fund open source.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1265]
If things go the way I hope this year, I may be able to fund it myself.
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1266]
Fortunately one pivot that has shown some success lately in these 
cases lately has been the switch from a commercial entity to an industry-backed 
non-commercial project. That has worked for a lot of languages. Since 
that is basically what Carl did, I hope it works for us too.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1267]
Not open source - just a simple business.
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1268]
Cool :)
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1269]
I'm thinking of a product that empowers enyone who needs to teach 
anything.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1270]
That sounds like an inspired idea.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1271]
More clearly, create a technologically empowered learning environment.
james_nak
28-Feb-2013
[1272]
I'm thinking more of a specific tool/s
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1273]
JN: I think there will be a key tool around which it all revolves, 
like Hypercard.
NickA
28-Feb-2013
[1274]
Write a business plan, write a business plan, write a business plan
BrianH
28-Feb-2013
[1275]
Btw, the reason I can't work in the education market is because they 
don't tend to take college dropouts, even ones that have done post-graduate 
work. Minor detail.
Scot
28-Feb-2013
[1276x2]
Right.  I'm writing a disseration...
Not at the moment because you people are too distracting. :)