World: r4wp
[!REBOL3] General discussion about REBOL 3
older newer | first last |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1228x2] | Yes, and a REBOL back end would make the next "tougher" layer easier to dig into. |
REBOL can be as high level as needed - more so than *any other language. | |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1230] | There would be room for an "Algebra dialect" |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1231] | The livecode guys are working towards understanding the "natural language" idea, but they're a long way from achieving what Carl already accomplished with REBOL. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1232] | Like Hypercard, the App becomes a "window" into the language. AltME has this potential, Presenter.r had this potential, Layout.r has this potential. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1233] | VID and other similar dialects had the greatest potential. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1234x2] | The kicker would be quality formative assessment tools that would give teachers and students feedback on how they are doing. |
But the Apps the make the language accessible were never made. I have had long discussions about this before at RT. | |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1236] | Scot and Nick, Rebol has been my secret weapon. Despite trying to get others to look at it. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1237] | I think that could be the case for many more people. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1238] | And I with you Scot on wanting an IOS version for precisely for the ed market. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1239x3] | I don't think much has to change. REBOL just needs to be updated, the look modernized, and ALL the modern platforms supported. |
It's original purpose and benefits are still totally values. | |
values -> valid | |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1242] | I had funding for an ISP business model for RT, not a direction they wanted to go. I also successfuly pitched the Internet Operating System Idea to a major ISP, again RT wanted to go in a different direction. I have discussed the Classroom idea before but never been able to pitch it. |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1243] | Man, I envy the education market. I wish I could work in it :-/ |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1244] | BrianH, you would and should be a god there! |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1245] | RT made terrible marketing and business decisions. There is absolutely no reason why REBOL shouldn't be a big success. RT just didn't make it happen. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1246] | I could be in a position quite soon to revive discussions about Classroom. Local WiFi distributed network. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1247] | Now that it's open source, anyone can pick it up. Personally, I think Doc has all the right ideas with Red. |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1248] | They're only terrible in retrospect. Nobody knew back then that its entire business model would die. We know now, but thet didn't know back then. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1249x2] | I knew. |
And vocalized them clearly. | |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1251] | RT Partly didn't, but also partly couldn't. There were customers to support making it hard to take on big players, even if with a possibily high ROI. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1252] | I hope Doc has the technical chops to pull it off, because his head is in the right place, and the right perspective about the market. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1253] | Well, that's where Rebol was getting all their money so I suppose it seemed like a great idea at the time. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1254x2] | I won't say more about the opportunites that were there because it isn't my story to tell. |
The people chosen at the critical stage to run the company were not a good fit, unfortunately. | |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1256] | A lot of people said a lot of stuff on both sides. And I meant die on a societal level, not just for RT. And I meant back before 2000. A lot of people thought they knew stuff back then, but most of that knowledge was really belief. For one thing, back then people in the free software camp thought free software would succeed because of principles - very few knew that those principles would be irrelevant and that practical considerations would make it succeed for other reasons. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1257] | Happens all the time. We are very fortunate that Carl continued the work as long as he did. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1258] | Yup |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1259] | That's true Scot :) |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1260x2] | Agreed. So I still have quite a few ideas, though my funding sources have long since disappeared. |
I suppose I might be able to drum up some more, but not unless they can own it. | |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1262] | Scot, you need to write that killer app! |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1263] | I am working on making a business model. If I can get it started, I can help get funding. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1264] | I don't know people who fund open source. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1265] | If things go the way I hope this year, I may be able to fund it myself. |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1266] | Fortunately one pivot that has shown some success lately in these cases lately has been the switch from a commercial entity to an industry-backed non-commercial project. That has worked for a lot of languages. Since that is basically what Carl did, I hope it works for us too. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1267] | Not open source - just a simple business. |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1268] | Cool :) |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1269] | I'm thinking of a product that empowers enyone who needs to teach anything. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1270] | That sounds like an inspired idea. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1271] | More clearly, create a technologically empowered learning environment. |
james_nak 28-Feb-2013 [1272] | I'm thinking more of a specific tool/s |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1273] | JN: I think there will be a key tool around which it all revolves, like Hypercard. |
NickA 28-Feb-2013 [1274] | Write a business plan, write a business plan, write a business plan |
BrianH 28-Feb-2013 [1275] | Btw, the reason I can't work in the education market is because they don't tend to take college dropouts, even ones that have done post-graduate work. Minor detail. |
Scot 28-Feb-2013 [1276x2] | Right. I'm writing a disseration... |
Not at the moment because you people are too distracting. :) | |
older newer | first last |