• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[!REBOL3] General discussion about REBOL 3

Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1628]
http://issue.cc/r3/1992- BROWSE doesn't work on OSX
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1629x2]
Great.
So should I submit pull requests referencing these tickets?
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1631]
Squash the two 1992-related commits into one, and also mention the 
CureCode ticket in the commit message (something like "This fixes 
CureCode issue #1992.") and submit a pull for that.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1632]
To squash I need to rebase locally then repush?
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1633]
Yes, exactly (push --force).
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1634]
Okay
BrianH
10-Mar-2013
[1635]
For #1991 se need a better approach. We aren't at the point where 
we would need to disable a feature while we wait to figure it out, 
at least for something you have to explicitly call.
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1636]
Hope you don't mind the cosmetics :)
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1637]
Andreas: np, just testing the squashed changeset
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1638]
For #1991, we should at least get the crash removed right away.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1639]
Sufficient detail, https://github.com/rebol/r3/pull/101?
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1640]
Looks good.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1641]
https://github.com/rebol/r3/pull/102
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1642x3]
Let's hope Haiku has fork/exec :)
Again, the second pull won't fly as-is.
If you can isolate the unset changes alone, that'd be great.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1645x2]
Np.
I figured I might as well submit the request so the code is more 
visible.
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1647]
Okay, that's fine, thanks. Just to have expectations aligned :)
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1648]
Meanwhile I might merge that fix into my browse-macosx branch.
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1649]
Just don't push the merged branch to Github again, as this will also 
affect the pull request.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1650x3]
Oh, right
A third browse branch it is!
(As you might have gathered, I'm not much of a Githubber)
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1653]
For NONE I see the following options to fix the crash right away: 
either remove the NONE feature altogether (removing functionality 
that currently sometimes works on Win32), or use http:// on POSIX 
(as a not totally reliable workaround), or move the early exit to 
the POSIX specific code (creating a cross-platform incompatibility 
between Win32 and POSIX platforms).
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1654x2]
Re: Haiku, http://code.metager.de/source/xref/haiku/headers/posix/unistd.h#212
Anyway, the subtree is named 'posix' :)
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1656]
Good, thanks for looking that up. I can try building on Haiku later 
on.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1657x2]
Great
Git question: can I ignore changes to makefile without modifying 
.gitignore?
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1659]
With how the repository is currently set up: I don't know of a way 
how to do that. Just don't add the makefile changes before you commit.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1660x3]
Sure, I'm not staging them.
I seem to recall that there's a global ignore setting
(Which I'd likely be abusing, but might be suitable.)
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1663x2]
I don't think that comes into play with files already present in 
the repo.
.git/info/exclude is a per-repository ignore list.
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1665x2]
Aha, thanks
Just found that https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-fileshere
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1667]
Cool. So --assume-unchanged helps :)

git update-index --assume-unchanged make/makefile
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1668x2]
Oh good stuff -- the exclude list doesn't
Since already committed
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1670]
Hopefully one remembers having marked a file with --assume-unchanged 
when actually _trying_ to stage changes from that file :)
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1671x5]
$ git ls-files -v | grep "^[a-z]"
h make/makefile
aha, http://durdn.com/blog/2012/11/22/must-have-git-aliases-advanced-examples/
nice aliases
including unasumeall
This SO chat seems quite nice, perhaps I should sign up. The interleaving 
of CureCode and Github feeds works well.
Andreas
10-Mar-2013
[1676]
That's pretty nice, yes :)
MarcS
10-Mar-2013
[1677]
Incidentally, nice to (re)meet you.