[REBOL] Re: Help me, Obi Reb Kenobi, you're my only hope!
From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 1-Sep-2002 12:06
Hi Ladislav,
On Saturday, August 31, 2002, 8:28:43 PM, you wrote:
LM> I am still curious, if many Rebol users prefer to allow UNSET! valued
LM> expressions (eventually why?).
There's no reason to have them, and that's just likely to be an
implementation issue with the current interpreter (it needs unset!
for unset words, and once you have that is pretty natural to have:
>> f: func [] [return]
return unset!, being RETURN's argument unset; so they have
probably decided that empty blocks should have returned unset!
too...)
LM> OTOH, both versions of DEFAULT cannot discern "illegal" and "legal" errors,
LM> which is another glitch in Rebol I would prefer to have straightened.
I was looking in your site to see what you intend for an illegal
error, but I wasn't able to find it.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r
