FOR question...
[1/3] from: carl:cybercraft at: 26-Mar-2009 7:51
On Thursday, 26-March-2009 at 6:08:52 Petr Krenzelok wrote,
-pekr- said...
>And when I need to know the position, then I use old-school for loop :-)
Has FOR been made a native in R3, or is it still a mezzanine function - and hence still
slow? I find it's the best choice of loop sometimes, but knowing it's slower than it
should be annoys me.
-- Carl Read.
[2/3] from: petr:krenzelok:seznam:cz at: 26-Mar-2009 6:41
Carl Read napsal(a):
> On Thursday, 26-March-2009 at 6:08:52 Petr Krenzelok wrote,
>
> -pekr- said...
>
>> And when I need to know the position, then I use old-school for loop :-)
>>
>
> Has FOR been made a native in R3, or is it still a mezzanine function - and hence still
slow? I find it's the best choice of loop sometimes, but knowing it's slower than it
should be annoys me.
>
yes, help in R3 console reveals it is a native function in R3 ...
-pekr-
[3/3] from: carl::cybercraft::co::nz at: 26-Mar-2009 7:51
On Thursday, 26-March-2009 at 6:41:21 Petr Krenzelok wrote,
>> Has FOR been made a native in R3, or is it still a mezzanine function - and
>>hence still slow? I find it's the best choice of loop sometimes, but knowing
>>it's slower than it should be annoys me.
>
>yes, help in R3 console reveals it is a native function in R3 ...
Excellent. Thank you!
-- Carl Read.