elegant idiom anyone?
[1/5] from: kpeters:otaksoft at: 12-Feb-2008 18:33
Who has an elegant way to
convert
b: [ "1" "2" "3" ]
to
b: [ 1 2 3 ]
TIA,
Kai
[2/5] from: anton:wilddsl:au at: 13-Feb-2008 14:54
Hi Kai,
Kai Peters wrote:
> Who has an elegant way to
> convert
<<quoted lines omitted: 3>>
> TIA,
> Kai
We've been over this before, I'm sure, but anyway:
>> to-block form b
== [1 2 3]
>> forall b [change b to-integer first b]
== []
>> b
== [1 2 3]
Regards,
Anton.
[3/5] from: kpeters:otaksoft at: 12-Feb-2008 20:16
Thanks Anton ~
that's a bit more elegant than my building a new block etc.
Just did a quick search of my 128 posts to the rebol list and
couldn't find myself having asked this before.
So I do hope you mistake me for someone else and that
Alzheimer's is still a few years away for me....
Kai
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:54:29 +1100, Anton Rolls wrote:
[4/5] from: carl:cybercraft at: 13-Feb-2008 6:16
On Wednesday, 13-February-2008 at 14:54:29 Anton Rolls wrote,
>Hi Kai,
>Kai Peters wrote:
<<quoted lines omitted: 18>>
> >> b
>== [1 2 3]
Is there any reason you need the forall? ...
>> b: to-block form [ "1" "2" "3" ]
== [1 2 3]
>> type? b/1
== integer!
?
-- Carl Read.
[5/5] from: Tom::Conlin::gmail::com at: 12-Feb-2008 22:00
Hi Kai
I am pretty sure Anton's "we" was the maillist and not you in specific.
Kai Peters wrote:
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted